This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Repository (publishing) page were merged into Institutional repository on December 2013 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 02:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 02:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 02:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 03:25, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 03:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 04:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 04:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 05:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 05:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 06:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
CiteSeerX doesn't fit my conceptualization of a repository; people don't intentionally deposit things there. Rather, it harvests them from elsewhere, so it seems to me more like a database. What do you think? Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 10:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Please discuss at Talk:Institutional_repository#Merger_with_Repository_.28publishing.29. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
This article had tons of red links for no good reason, often simple misspellings or phrases that could easily be pointed at other articles. I'm going to try to clean it up but forgive me if I miss something. Phette23 ( talk) 23:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Repository (publishing) page were merged into Institutional repository on December 2013 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 02:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 02:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 02:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 03:25, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 03:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 04:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 04:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 05:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 05:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.223.168 ( talk) 06:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
CiteSeerX doesn't fit my conceptualization of a repository; people don't intentionally deposit things there. Rather, it harvests them from elsewhere, so it seems to me more like a database. What do you think? Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 10:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Please discuss at Talk:Institutional_repository#Merger_with_Repository_.28publishing.29. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
This article had tons of red links for no good reason, often simple misspellings or phrases that could easily be pointed at other articles. I'm going to try to clean it up but forgive me if I miss something. Phette23 ( talk) 23:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)