This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renault鈥揘issan鈥揗itsubishi Alliance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Renault-Nissan Alliance signing.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Renault-Nissan Alliance signing.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Carlos Ghosn Leaf.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Carlos Ghosn Leaf.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 06:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 23:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Renault-Nissan Alliance 鈫 Renault鈥揘issan Alliance 鈥 Per MOS:ENDASH. I'd just do it if it were a descriptive title instead of a proper name. Marcus Qwertyus ( talk) 02:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
With regards to the 2013 total Alliance sales, there appears to be a conflict between the data of two sources. Both sources should be authoritative, but they differ. media.blog.alliance-renault-nissan.com says (at least it did when I checked on Feb 8, 2014): "The Renault-Nissan Alliance sold a record 8,264,821 vehicles," whereas http://media.renault.com says: "The Renault-Nissan Alliance sold a record 8,266,098 vehicles..." Having to pick one, I picked the latter. This goes to show that one can't be too careful with numbers and sources. BsBsBs ( talk) 04:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Renault鈥揘issan Alliance. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.鈥 cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Ridwan97 ( talk) 09:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Renault鈥揘issan Alliance 鈫
Renault鈥揘issan鈥揗itsubishi Alliance 鈥 Mitsubishi being treated as an equal partner,
name is in new logo.
Jgera5 (
talk)
01:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I have various issues with the section. It starts with a nearly verbatim copy of the Reuters commentary on the greater profitability of Nissan (later copied by other sources). Many holdings are less profitable that their subsidiaries, the inference that Nissan being more profitable means in any way that it deserves more rights and is therefore justified is a matter of opinion and should be presented that way. Most of the intrincate detail on the conflict is based in info provided by alleged, unnamed "insiders" and shouldn't be included unless the sources are properly attributed in-text, not written in Wikipedia's voice. The French government denied be pushing for a Nissan-Renault merger at present, the things the media says should be balanced with hard facts. Bias in source should be avoided by editors. Urbanoc ( talk) 01:38, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renault鈥揘issan鈥揗itsubishi Alliance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Renault-Nissan Alliance signing.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Renault-Nissan Alliance signing.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Carlos Ghosn Leaf.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Carlos Ghosn Leaf.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 06:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 23:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Renault-Nissan Alliance 鈫 Renault鈥揘issan Alliance 鈥 Per MOS:ENDASH. I'd just do it if it were a descriptive title instead of a proper name. Marcus Qwertyus ( talk) 02:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
With regards to the 2013 total Alliance sales, there appears to be a conflict between the data of two sources. Both sources should be authoritative, but they differ. media.blog.alliance-renault-nissan.com says (at least it did when I checked on Feb 8, 2014): "The Renault-Nissan Alliance sold a record 8,264,821 vehicles," whereas http://media.renault.com says: "The Renault-Nissan Alliance sold a record 8,266,098 vehicles..." Having to pick one, I picked the latter. This goes to show that one can't be too careful with numbers and sources. BsBsBs ( talk) 04:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Renault鈥揘issan Alliance. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.鈥 cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Ridwan97 ( talk) 09:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Renault鈥揘issan Alliance 鈫
Renault鈥揘issan鈥揗itsubishi Alliance 鈥 Mitsubishi being treated as an equal partner,
name is in new logo.
Jgera5 (
talk)
01:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I have various issues with the section. It starts with a nearly verbatim copy of the Reuters commentary on the greater profitability of Nissan (later copied by other sources). Many holdings are less profitable that their subsidiaries, the inference that Nissan being more profitable means in any way that it deserves more rights and is therefore justified is a matter of opinion and should be presented that way. Most of the intrincate detail on the conflict is based in info provided by alleged, unnamed "insiders" and shouldn't be included unless the sources are properly attributed in-text, not written in Wikipedia's voice. The French government denied be pushing for a Nissan-Renault merger at present, the things the media says should be balanced with hard facts. Bias in source should be avoided by editors. Urbanoc ( talk) 01:38, 23 January 2019 (UTC)