This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Red meat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The NutriRECS paper uses a different methodology which has been heavily criticized by health authorities as flawed [1], [2]. 14 health organizations including all of the leading cancer organizations such as the American Institute for Cancer Research, American Society for Preventive Oncology, Bowel Cancer Australia, Bowel Cancer UK, Cancer Council Australia and International Agency for Research on Cancer disagree with their interpretation of the scientific evidence. This has been discussed already on this talk-page and others. The NutriRECS goes against scientific consensus. It is undue weight to be citing it on the article. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 16:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Sbelknap who has been topic banned from editing medical articles added several review papers heavily sponsored by the beef and pork industry onto this Wikipedia article. This review for example that he added was funded by the The Pork Checkoff [5]. The authors also received funding from the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Pork Board, North Dakota Beef Commission and Foundation for Meat and Poultry Research and Education. This is heavy industry funded research with an obvious bias, it has no place on Wikipedia. I have removed these sources. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 21:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Red meat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The NutriRECS paper uses a different methodology which has been heavily criticized by health authorities as flawed [1], [2]. 14 health organizations including all of the leading cancer organizations such as the American Institute for Cancer Research, American Society for Preventive Oncology, Bowel Cancer Australia, Bowel Cancer UK, Cancer Council Australia and International Agency for Research on Cancer disagree with their interpretation of the scientific evidence. This has been discussed already on this talk-page and others. The NutriRECS goes against scientific consensus. It is undue weight to be citing it on the article. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 16:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Sbelknap who has been topic banned from editing medical articles added several review papers heavily sponsored by the beef and pork industry onto this Wikipedia article. This review for example that he added was funded by the The Pork Checkoff [5]. The authors also received funding from the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Pork Board, North Dakota Beef Commission and Foundation for Meat and Poultry Research and Education. This is heavy industry funded research with an obvious bias, it has no place on Wikipedia. I have removed these sources. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 21:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)