This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From User: Oda Mari Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Red-crowned Crane worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
THIS IS THE BOMB YEAH OK WHATS UP YEAH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.64.200.127 ( talk) 01:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
The article says the red-crowned crane is the second rarest crane in the world. What's the first? LordAmeth ( talk) 15:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Crowned Crane which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Red-crowned crane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Dodobird2004: In reference to a series of edits on 9 August 2021, existing claims seem to be partially merged, based on a source consisting of a Korean language YouTube video. Additionally, there are multiple issues with English mechanics, such that one cannot surmise the meaning.
These changes modified existing claims while retaining the existing sources, so it's not clear that the claims as originally stated were not supported. Specific issues which this sequence of edits raises:
Unless there is someone will volunteer to address these issues, I would suggest that the entire sequence of edits will need to be reverted. Fabrickator ( talk) 21:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
एनएन 43.241.126.232 ( talk) 10:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From User: Oda Mari Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Red-crowned Crane worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
THIS IS THE BOMB YEAH OK WHATS UP YEAH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.64.200.127 ( talk) 01:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
The article says the red-crowned crane is the second rarest crane in the world. What's the first? LordAmeth ( talk) 15:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Crowned Crane which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Red-crowned crane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Dodobird2004: In reference to a series of edits on 9 August 2021, existing claims seem to be partially merged, based on a source consisting of a Korean language YouTube video. Additionally, there are multiple issues with English mechanics, such that one cannot surmise the meaning.
These changes modified existing claims while retaining the existing sources, so it's not clear that the claims as originally stated were not supported. Specific issues which this sequence of edits raises:
Unless there is someone will volunteer to address these issues, I would suggest that the entire sequence of edits will need to be reverted. Fabrickator ( talk) 21:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
एनएन 43.241.126.232 ( talk) 10:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)