![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I remember I read the name of the movie as nawaf Trouble some time ago, isn't it so?
Fanofbollywood ( talk) 10:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ready-Front.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so ( commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image for this article before it is deleted.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotification ( talk) 19:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ready-Front.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Túrelio for the following reason: Copyright violation: And another filmcover without permission.
You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotification ( talk) 20:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
This guy Scieberking here is changing the article as per whatever he deems is correct. a few bullets:
Guys I can go on and on, but like everyone else (obviously unlike the said guy) we all have limited time, besides no one is getting paid here to contribute to wikipedia, if this is the behavior people will get out of a volunteer work, who is going to stick around?
Fanofbollywood ( talk) 14:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
talk:Fanofbollywood|talk]]) 18:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Scieberking ( talk · contribs) asked me on my talkpage to semi-protect this page. After investigation, I have full protected the page for one day. I am not endorsing anyone's position here - but note that editors need to discuss subjective characterizations such as positive or negative reviews here on the talk page rather than endlessly reverting each other. I also want to issue a general warning against edit warring, and a caution against editing anonymously in an attempt to avoid WP:3RR. There's no reason for anyone to end up blocked over a movie premiere when a few days should bring clarity on the issue. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
I don't think there's a reason for being sad. And I highly respect you and your opinions as a fellow editor, Fanofbollywood. Regards, Scieberking ( talk) 08:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Transplanted from
User talk:Scieberking and
User talk:Managerarc
I think this thing needs to be discussed first. How to identify whether a film has received positive, negative or mixed reviews. As far as I can see there are more negative reviews than positive.--- Managerarc™ talk 08:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A few more notable and major reviews that I think should be added in the "Critical response" section:
Regards, Scieberking ( talk) 08:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This should be added in the "Box Office" section:
Ready has become the second highest opening day net grosser of all time (after Dabangg 14.5 crore; ahead of Tees Maar Khan 12.89 crore), as it collected 13 crore nett on its first day.
Source: Ready Territorial Breakdown: All India First Day 13 Crore. BoxOfficeIndia.com Scieberking ( talk) 16:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
The source, which clearly mentions "READY is now the third highest Hindi cinema grosser ever, behind 3 IDIOTS and DABANGG", is reliable enough to back up a FACT. Here are the top 4 films according to nett gross (not gross) collections:
1- 3 Idiots: 202,57,00,000
2- Dabangg: 181,00,00,000
3- Ready: 130,00,00,000
4- Ghajini: 114,67,00,000
This is further verified by the all-India (domestic) distributor share which is 64,00,00,000; third highest ever after the 99 crore of 3 Idiots and 77 crore of Dabangg. BOI
Scieberking ( talk) 03:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
I understand that Taran Adarsh is a top critic, but he is by no means a reliable source for Box office figures or verdicts. The ONLY source for Box Office information on any Bollywood film is Box Office India, as it is costumed for all bollywood film found on Wiki. Hence, the film is a Blockbuster as stated by BOI and should be declared as so, and the verdict of Mr.Adarsh should be removed because putting it here is biased. Meryam90 ( talk) 06:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Taran's verdict of the Box office performance of any bollywood film is hardly taken into account. (yes, I agree, He is a leading trade analyst of Bollywood) But the majority of the trade analyst of Bolywood which I can provide you with their "verdicts" regarding 'Ready', agree on the one provided by BOI. and saying BOI is only a website is like regarding Box office Mojo as so. and I wasn't calling Mr.Adarsh as biased, I was amplifying that the unusual use of his opinion (here on WIKI) regarding box office performance of a film as biased. Meryam90 ( talk) 10:11, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
359324062136446 117.20.115.76 ( talk) 03:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I remember I read the name of the movie as nawaf Trouble some time ago, isn't it so?
Fanofbollywood ( talk) 10:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ready-Front.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so ( commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image for this article before it is deleted.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotification ( talk) 19:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ready-Front.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Túrelio for the following reason: Copyright violation: And another filmcover without permission.
You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotification ( talk) 20:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
This guy Scieberking here is changing the article as per whatever he deems is correct. a few bullets:
Guys I can go on and on, but like everyone else (obviously unlike the said guy) we all have limited time, besides no one is getting paid here to contribute to wikipedia, if this is the behavior people will get out of a volunteer work, who is going to stick around?
Fanofbollywood ( talk) 14:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
talk:Fanofbollywood|talk]]) 18:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Scieberking ( talk · contribs) asked me on my talkpage to semi-protect this page. After investigation, I have full protected the page for one day. I am not endorsing anyone's position here - but note that editors need to discuss subjective characterizations such as positive or negative reviews here on the talk page rather than endlessly reverting each other. I also want to issue a general warning against edit warring, and a caution against editing anonymously in an attempt to avoid WP:3RR. There's no reason for anyone to end up blocked over a movie premiere when a few days should bring clarity on the issue. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
I don't think there's a reason for being sad. And I highly respect you and your opinions as a fellow editor, Fanofbollywood. Regards, Scieberking ( talk) 08:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Transplanted from
User talk:Scieberking and
User talk:Managerarc
I think this thing needs to be discussed first. How to identify whether a film has received positive, negative or mixed reviews. As far as I can see there are more negative reviews than positive.--- Managerarc™ talk 08:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A few more notable and major reviews that I think should be added in the "Critical response" section:
Regards, Scieberking ( talk) 08:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This should be added in the "Box Office" section:
Ready has become the second highest opening day net grosser of all time (after Dabangg 14.5 crore; ahead of Tees Maar Khan 12.89 crore), as it collected 13 crore nett on its first day.
Source: Ready Territorial Breakdown: All India First Day 13 Crore. BoxOfficeIndia.com Scieberking ( talk) 16:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
The source, which clearly mentions "READY is now the third highest Hindi cinema grosser ever, behind 3 IDIOTS and DABANGG", is reliable enough to back up a FACT. Here are the top 4 films according to nett gross (not gross) collections:
1- 3 Idiots: 202,57,00,000
2- Dabangg: 181,00,00,000
3- Ready: 130,00,00,000
4- Ghajini: 114,67,00,000
This is further verified by the all-India (domestic) distributor share which is 64,00,00,000; third highest ever after the 99 crore of 3 Idiots and 77 crore of Dabangg. BOI
Scieberking ( talk) 03:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
I understand that Taran Adarsh is a top critic, but he is by no means a reliable source for Box office figures or verdicts. The ONLY source for Box Office information on any Bollywood film is Box Office India, as it is costumed for all bollywood film found on Wiki. Hence, the film is a Blockbuster as stated by BOI and should be declared as so, and the verdict of Mr.Adarsh should be removed because putting it here is biased. Meryam90 ( talk) 06:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Taran's verdict of the Box office performance of any bollywood film is hardly taken into account. (yes, I agree, He is a leading trade analyst of Bollywood) But the majority of the trade analyst of Bolywood which I can provide you with their "verdicts" regarding 'Ready', agree on the one provided by BOI. and saying BOI is only a website is like regarding Box office Mojo as so. and I wasn't calling Mr.Adarsh as biased, I was amplifying that the unusual use of his opinion (here on WIKI) regarding box office performance of a film as biased. Meryam90 ( talk) 10:11, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
359324062136446 117.20.115.76 ( talk) 03:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)