This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence The article Race Differences in Intelligence (book), along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Nom Withdrawn. |
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 400 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Of pure interest, what is the rationel for not including the graph from the book? It is what the book wanted to "prove", and it found the typical correlation of 0.4 decimal with brain size and IQ that others found - helmuth nyborg, phillip rushtoh, earl hunt etc..... MicroMacroMania ( talk) 09:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Many leftists try again and again to delete the main informations of this book on the article page. They delete the picture of the book, they delete the table, they want to minimizer this article and to maximizer the negative critics. Race differences in intelligence receive a fully positive reception from specialists of intelligence, from all the great names in intelligence (Gottfredson University of Delaware, Rushton University of Western Ontario, Nyborg University of Aartus, Serge Larivée University of Montreal, Thomas J. Bouchard Jr. University of Minnesota, John B. Carroll University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raymond B. Cattell, University of Hawaii, David B. Cohen, University of Texas at Austin...). Could a moderator do something against this ? Like exclude them ?
80.236.246.37 (
talk) 20:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
I have reverted the article back to what we agreed to based on the long discussion, that is here on the discussion page. ParanoidLemmings ( talk) 09:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
"Reviews of the book fault the selection of data used, the methodology, and the conclusions drawn from the data, resulting in criticism that it is "the sort of book that gives IQ testing a bad name."
Ok, but it shouldn't be in the intro, as it's not the case for other pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 ( talk) 23:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
DELETE 2nd Paragraph as it Quotes a surreptitious charged SMEAR with NO Quote Links and is NOT indicative of the general academic literature consensus
DELETE Reviews of the book fault the selection of data used, the methodology, and the conclusions drawn from the data, resulting in criticism that it is "the sort of book that gives IQ testing a bad name."
<=== NO QUOTE SUBSTANTIATION ie CONTRIVED or FRAUDULENT ATTRIBUTION indeed the main other academics in this area including the preeminent Professor Murray of the Bell Curve Fame have roundly praised Lynns methodology which said praise is precisely quoted in the articles contents Vademecum15 ( talk) 03:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. The 2nd paragraph is a summary of the contents of the article, the quote is referenced in the section "Reception".--
Goldsztajn (
talk) 11:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence The article Race Differences in Intelligence (book), along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Nom Withdrawn. |
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 400 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Of pure interest, what is the rationel for not including the graph from the book? It is what the book wanted to "prove", and it found the typical correlation of 0.4 decimal with brain size and IQ that others found - helmuth nyborg, phillip rushtoh, earl hunt etc..... MicroMacroMania ( talk) 09:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Many leftists try again and again to delete the main informations of this book on the article page. They delete the picture of the book, they delete the table, they want to minimizer this article and to maximizer the negative critics. Race differences in intelligence receive a fully positive reception from specialists of intelligence, from all the great names in intelligence (Gottfredson University of Delaware, Rushton University of Western Ontario, Nyborg University of Aartus, Serge Larivée University of Montreal, Thomas J. Bouchard Jr. University of Minnesota, John B. Carroll University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raymond B. Cattell, University of Hawaii, David B. Cohen, University of Texas at Austin...). Could a moderator do something against this ? Like exclude them ?
80.236.246.37 (
talk) 20:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
I have reverted the article back to what we agreed to based on the long discussion, that is here on the discussion page. ParanoidLemmings ( talk) 09:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
"Reviews of the book fault the selection of data used, the methodology, and the conclusions drawn from the data, resulting in criticism that it is "the sort of book that gives IQ testing a bad name."
Ok, but it shouldn't be in the intro, as it's not the case for other pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 ( talk) 23:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
DELETE 2nd Paragraph as it Quotes a surreptitious charged SMEAR with NO Quote Links and is NOT indicative of the general academic literature consensus
DELETE Reviews of the book fault the selection of data used, the methodology, and the conclusions drawn from the data, resulting in criticism that it is "the sort of book that gives IQ testing a bad name."
<=== NO QUOTE SUBSTANTIATION ie CONTRIVED or FRAUDULENT ATTRIBUTION indeed the main other academics in this area including the preeminent Professor Murray of the Bell Curve Fame have roundly praised Lynns methodology which said praise is precisely quoted in the articles contents Vademecum15 ( talk) 03:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. The 2nd paragraph is a summary of the contents of the article, the quote is referenced in the section "Reception".--
Goldsztajn (
talk) 11:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)