![]() | Queers Read This is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by ezlev ( user/ tlk/ ctrbs) at 07:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: 1990 essay about queer identity |
![]() | A fact from Queers Read This appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 10:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by Ezlev ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Ezlev ( talk · contribs) 07:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: B3251 ( talk · contribs) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have reviewed this article and will provide notes that I made below. B3251 (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Please check 1a, 1b, and 2c.
a. Clear and concise prose
b. MoS compliance
a. List of citations and works cited
b. Sources cited inline
c. No original research
d. No copyright violations/plagiarism
a. Addresses main aspects of the topic
b. Focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Gives due weight to viewpoints presented about "Queers Read This" among various sources
Not under any edit wars or dispute
a. Media have proper copyright statuses attached, valid non-free use rationales provided for non-free images
b. All media are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions
For what it's worth, some of my comments are available at
User talk:ezlev/Archives/2024/April#Comments re GAN of Queers Read This. I don't think this is necessarily a barrier to promotion, but I think our article is a bit outdated by saying It is unclear who wrote "Queers Read This"
. The OutWeek additions in a recent edit are good for giving contemporary coverage of the essay.
Urve (
talk) 05:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Queers Read This is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by ezlev ( user/ tlk/ ctrbs) at 07:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: 1990 essay about queer identity |
![]() | A fact from Queers Read This appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 10:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by Ezlev ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Ezlev ( talk · contribs) 07:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: B3251 ( talk · contribs) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have reviewed this article and will provide notes that I made below. B3251 (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Please check 1a, 1b, and 2c.
a. Clear and concise prose
b. MoS compliance
a. List of citations and works cited
b. Sources cited inline
c. No original research
d. No copyright violations/plagiarism
a. Addresses main aspects of the topic
b. Focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Gives due weight to viewpoints presented about "Queers Read This" among various sources
Not under any edit wars or dispute
a. Media have proper copyright statuses attached, valid non-free use rationales provided for non-free images
b. All media are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions
For what it's worth, some of my comments are available at
User talk:ezlev/Archives/2024/April#Comments re GAN of Queers Read This. I don't think this is necessarily a barrier to promotion, but I think our article is a bit outdated by saying It is unclear who wrote "Queers Read This"
. The OutWeek additions in a recent edit are good for giving contemporary coverage of the essay.
Urve (
talk) 05:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)