 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
for news sources. GARDEN 20:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Could we have some references to scientific journals instead of generic newspapers? 188.100.205.226 ( talk) 00:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I haven't been following this all that closely, but I don't think it *has* been published scientifically yet.
J. Spencer (
talk) 22:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- http://www.nhm.uio.no/pliosaurus/english/
- This page say "All the scientific results will be published in a full scientific paper later this year.". But I can't find any scientific paper. This year will be finished soon......--
130.199.3.140 (
talk) 02:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- It could be the December issue of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, I suppose.
J. Spencer (
talk) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
-
http://www.bioone.org/toc/vrpa/29/4 no result ?
- Apparently not. Well, there are other journals, and publication can be pushed back for various reasons. J. Spencer ( talk) 22:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
-
http://www.bioone.org/toc/vrpa/29/4 no result ?
- It could be the December issue of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, I suppose.
J. Spencer (
talk) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
99,000 pounds Jesus Christ that it is over 48 tons or almost as heavy as a megalodon.
And at 49 feet although most sights put it 50 feet it was almost as long to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.100.52 ( talk) 19:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Has this species been given a scientific name yet? it's been a few years... are they still investigating this beast? -- 71.0.116.132 ( talk) 00:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Not yet. No formal paper has been issued yet from the discovery team. It may be they are being very careful to make sure this is not a very large specimen of an already identified taxon. HammerFilmFan ( talk) 22:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's fortcomming. It will be published in the Norwegian Journal of Geology, likely in a double issue in October this year. Petter Bøckman ( talk) 10:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
for news sources. GARDEN 20:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Could we have some references to scientific journals instead of generic newspapers? 188.100.205.226 ( talk) 00:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I haven't been following this all that closely, but I don't think it *has* been published scientifically yet.
J. Spencer (
talk) 22:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- http://www.nhm.uio.no/pliosaurus/english/
- This page say "All the scientific results will be published in a full scientific paper later this year.". But I can't find any scientific paper. This year will be finished soon......--
130.199.3.140 (
talk) 02:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- It could be the December issue of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, I suppose.
J. Spencer (
talk) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
-
http://www.bioone.org/toc/vrpa/29/4 no result ?
- Apparently not. Well, there are other journals, and publication can be pushed back for various reasons. J. Spencer ( talk) 22:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
-
http://www.bioone.org/toc/vrpa/29/4 no result ?
- It could be the December issue of the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, I suppose.
J. Spencer (
talk) 23:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
99,000 pounds Jesus Christ that it is over 48 tons or almost as heavy as a megalodon.
And at 49 feet although most sights put it 50 feet it was almost as long to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.100.52 ( talk) 19:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Has this species been given a scientific name yet? it's been a few years... are they still investigating this beast? -- 71.0.116.132 ( talk) 00:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Not yet. No formal paper has been issued yet from the discovery team. It may be they are being very careful to make sure this is not a very large specimen of an already identified taxon. HammerFilmFan ( talk) 22:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's fortcomming. It will be published in the Norwegian Journal of Geology, likely in a double issue in October this year. Petter Bøckman ( talk) 10:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)