This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in New York (state) or New Jersey may be able to help! |
Just a minor note: There should be a separate article devoted to the Port of New York and New Jersey. The Port Authority and the Port of New York and New Jersey are not the same thing; the latter refers to the actual port region and the commerce conducted within it (trade at marine terminals and airports), whereas the former is the agency that administers the Port of NY and NJ.
Forschung125 ( talk) 16:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Done May 2020 Djflem ( talk) 22:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Forschung125 -- Your note of nine years ago remains true today. A port is typically a water terminal. Therefore I recommend that we move Port of New York and New Jersey#Jurisdiction and regulation to Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. BTW Port of New York and New Jersey#Jurisdiction and regulation is hopelessly out of date. Port of New York and New Jersey#Car float and Cross Harbor Tunnel Both have their own articles, more up to date, so that section ought to go, save a pointer. Waddaya think? I can help. Rhadow ( talk) 22:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Floated above article about a week ago, and believe its pretty comprehensive but one always has blind spots. A look from fresh eyes would be great Djflem ( talk) 14:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
A request has been submitted for a request for comment. Please in the meantime, do not revert my edits. While there are good direct links to some destinations where ferries call within the port one editor has decided to create elborate circuititous routes to them. Is there a reaon why this would or would not be good? This spreads to other places, namely the destinations themselves, and NY Waterway article. It borders on edit war. There has been no response as to why it's deemed better. Djflem ( talk) 05:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
This article has too many level 2 headers. Perhaps they can be reorganized. Epicgenius ( talk) 21:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Port of New York and New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Port of New York and New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in New York (state) or New Jersey may be able to help! |
Just a minor note: There should be a separate article devoted to the Port of New York and New Jersey. The Port Authority and the Port of New York and New Jersey are not the same thing; the latter refers to the actual port region and the commerce conducted within it (trade at marine terminals and airports), whereas the former is the agency that administers the Port of NY and NJ.
Forschung125 ( talk) 16:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Done May 2020 Djflem ( talk) 22:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Forschung125 -- Your note of nine years ago remains true today. A port is typically a water terminal. Therefore I recommend that we move Port of New York and New Jersey#Jurisdiction and regulation to Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. BTW Port of New York and New Jersey#Jurisdiction and regulation is hopelessly out of date. Port of New York and New Jersey#Car float and Cross Harbor Tunnel Both have their own articles, more up to date, so that section ought to go, save a pointer. Waddaya think? I can help. Rhadow ( talk) 22:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Floated above article about a week ago, and believe its pretty comprehensive but one always has blind spots. A look from fresh eyes would be great Djflem ( talk) 14:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
A request has been submitted for a request for comment. Please in the meantime, do not revert my edits. While there are good direct links to some destinations where ferries call within the port one editor has decided to create elborate circuititous routes to them. Is there a reaon why this would or would not be good? This spreads to other places, namely the destinations themselves, and NY Waterway article. It borders on edit war. There has been no response as to why it's deemed better. Djflem ( talk) 05:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
This article has too many level 2 headers. Perhaps they can be reorganized. Epicgenius ( talk) 21:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Port of New York and New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Port of New York and New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)