The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet
There is a question into the validity of a quote in the article
Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet as shown in difference Special:Diff/1215143082. Edmund Patrick – confer 08:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the Minneapolis article begin its first section with A) an overview of the Native Americans who lived in the area (as it does now) with the heading "Dakota homeland, city founded", or B) the first European to view the area that became Minneapolis (as it does in this version) under the heading "Dakota people, city founded"? - SusanLesch ( talk) 23:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the following sentence be included after the heading Deployments in Peacekeeping Missions:
? Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
The last paragraph on the
Presidential Commission of Inquiry currently reads:
One editor wants the last paragraph to be changed to the following, as he believes both the Kearney and Manogaran sources have "accepted" the reasons attributed by Sansoni for the riots, whereas other editors believe that those sources are merely summarising Sansoni's reasons, and are not personal approvals. Do you agree with the proposed change below?
|
The first sentence of the section on alleged war crimes in the Sri Lankan Civil War currently reads:
Should the last phrase read:
? Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
How should the place of birth of Mohamed Hadid be described?
Prior RfC
FortunateSons ( talk) 08:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should
Belarus be listed in the infobox, and accordingly described in other parts of the article concerning the
events since 24 January 2024: (a). no (as at present); (b) as supported by; (c) as a co-belligerent; (d) without qualification?
Robert McClenon ( talk) 07:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should it be mentioned in this article, that the Canadian monarch resides in the United Kingdom? GoodDay ( talk) 21:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should we mention the exodus of Jews from Arab countries during and immediately after the war in the lede of this article? Alaexis ¿question? 23:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the descriptor "charismatic" be used in the first lead paragraph, and if so, where? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
In the lede, after the first casualty mentions, should we mention that some of the Israeli and Palestinian casualties were caused by friendly fire? If so, should we include this as a footnote or as direct text?
Specific wording would be determined through normal editing, but may be along the lines of:
04:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
Is Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#Current_consensus #14 still valid?. It says: "Do not mention the theory that the virus was accidentally leaked from a laboratory in the article. (May 2020)" Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 21:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of
OKO.press?
Previous RSN Discussion:
February 2021 For some background, OKO.press is mentioned or cited on 129 articles across English Wikipedia. After a talk page discussion on Visegrád 24, it was mentioned that the source may not be reliable. Given this source is cited in CTOPS articles (including Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, LGBTQ articles, and Israel-Hamas war articles), an RFC is needed to reassess reliability. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC) |
presidential commission
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet
There is a question into the validity of a quote in the article
Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet as shown in difference Special:Diff/1215143082. Edmund Patrick – confer 08:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the Minneapolis article begin its first section with A) an overview of the Native Americans who lived in the area (as it does now) with the heading "Dakota homeland, city founded", or B) the first European to view the area that became Minneapolis (as it does in this version) under the heading "Dakota people, city founded"? - SusanLesch ( talk) 23:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the following sentence be included after the heading Deployments in Peacekeeping Missions:
? Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
The last paragraph on the
Presidential Commission of Inquiry currently reads:
One editor wants the last paragraph to be changed to the following, as he believes both the Kearney and Manogaran sources have "accepted" the reasons attributed by Sansoni for the riots, whereas other editors believe that those sources are merely summarising Sansoni's reasons, and are not personal approvals. Do you agree with the proposed change below?
|
The first sentence of the section on alleged war crimes in the Sri Lankan Civil War currently reads:
Should the last phrase read:
? Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
How should the place of birth of Mohamed Hadid be described?
Prior RfC
FortunateSons ( talk) 08:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should
Belarus be listed in the infobox, and accordingly described in other parts of the article concerning the
events since 24 January 2024: (a). no (as at present); (b) as supported by; (c) as a co-belligerent; (d) without qualification?
Robert McClenon ( talk) 07:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should it be mentioned in this article, that the Canadian monarch resides in the United Kingdom? GoodDay ( talk) 21:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should we mention the exodus of Jews from Arab countries during and immediately after the war in the lede of this article? Alaexis ¿question? 23:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the descriptor "charismatic" be used in the first lead paragraph, and if so, where? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
In the lede, after the first casualty mentions, should we mention that some of the Israeli and Palestinian casualties were caused by friendly fire? If so, should we include this as a footnote or as direct text?
Specific wording would be determined through normal editing, but may be along the lines of:
04:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
Is Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#Current_consensus #14 still valid?. It says: "Do not mention the theory that the virus was accidentally leaked from a laboratory in the article. (May 2020)" Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 21:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of
OKO.press?
Previous RSN Discussion:
February 2021 For some background, OKO.press is mentioned or cited on 129 articles across English Wikipedia. After a talk page discussion on Visegrád 24, it was mentioned that the source may not be reliable. Given this source is cited in CTOPS articles (including Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, LGBTQ articles, and Israel-Hamas war articles), an RFC is needed to reassess reliability. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC) |
presidential commission
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).