Phintella parva was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Simongraham ( talk · contribs) 12:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs) 10:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I should finish the review today. Wolverine XI ( talk to me) 10:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I'll stop here. What is apparent is that the article needs to be rewritten. The grammar and prose is particularly subpar. I suggest working on the article prose before renominating. Best, Wolverine XI ( talk to me) 13:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Phintella parva was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Simongraham ( talk · contribs) 12:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs) 10:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I should finish the review today. Wolverine XI ( talk to me) 10:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I'll stop here. What is apparent is that the article needs to be rewritten. The grammar and prose is particularly subpar. I suggest working on the article prose before renominating. Best, Wolverine XI ( talk to me) 13:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)