This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
People v. Murray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 8 June 2021. The result of the move review was Overturned to move. |
The result of the move request was: No consensus -- there are a couple of alternative targets. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
California v. Murray → People v. Murray – Per MOS:LEGAL, "unless needed for specificity, leave state names out of the title, e.g., use State v. Elliott, not State of Vermont v. Raleigh Elliott, et al., and redirect the latter to the former." Official title seems to be People (of the state of CA) v. Murray Natg 19 ( talk) 03:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
I asked for a Move review at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2021_June#California_v._Murray. — В²C ☎ 05:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
People v. Murray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 8 June 2021. The result of the move review was Overturned to move. |
The result of the move request was: No consensus -- there are a couple of alternative targets. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
California v. Murray → People v. Murray – Per MOS:LEGAL, "unless needed for specificity, leave state names out of the title, e.g., use State v. Elliott, not State of Vermont v. Raleigh Elliott, et al., and redirect the latter to the former." Official title seems to be People (of the state of CA) v. Murray Natg 19 ( talk) 03:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
I asked for a Move review at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2021_June#California_v._Murray. — В²C ☎ 05:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)