![]() | The contents of the Panasonic (brand) page were merged into Panasonic on 10 October 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Panasonic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
This article is wildly obsolete, quoting Panasonic as a major consumer products manufacturer. it uses references from 20-30 years ago to support its claims, yet Panasonic withdrew entirely from retail consumer electronics following its bankruptcy in the 2000s, and remodeled itself. Stevenmitchell ( talk) 07:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Despite updating certain recent business activities, the article deliberately avoids any mention of Panasonic filing the largest bankruptcy in Japanese history (2015-2016?), with its plasma division, or its other setbacks. Panasonic (along with other Japanese manufacturers) had to retool and withdrew from the consumer retail market. Is this Wikipedia article written by recent company employees or corporate investors? Is that why it omits such significant information? Stevenmitchell ( talk) 07:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi! I have a COI: Panasonic Eco Systems North America (a.k.a. Panasonic Solar US) is a client of my employer, Porter Novelli. I request that a "Panasonic Eco Systems North America" section be added to this article as a subsection of "Current operations". This is a pretty significant portion of Panasonic's business that currently has no mention in the article. Here's the text I propose:
Thank you kindly for any feedback or assistance. Mary Gaulke ( talk) 16:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
References
When I was a student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the summer of 1962, one of my fellow students had a portable radio with the brand name "Matsushita". Some of the other students derided the radio, probably because of anti-Japanese prejudice, and called the radio "Matsa Shit", which I found offensive. That next year I moved to Europe for 4 years, and on returning, noticed that the brand name had been changed to "Panasonic". I couldn't help thinking of the perjorative name that I had heard 4 years before and thought it might have something to do with the name change. In the article, the adoption of the name Panasonic dates from 1961 (for television sets), but based on this indelible memory, I think the chronology might be in error. Of course, before and after the name change, the products have always been of the highest quality. Farogers ( talk) 01:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The essential "meat" of this article is already under the "Brand names" header on the main article for Panasonic. Even the links to the consumer website on each article are identical.
Simply put, there is not enough distinguishing information here to merit a separate article for the Panasonic brand. — That Coptic Guy ( let's talk?) ( contribs) 19:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
MESCO has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5 § MESCO until a consensus is reached.
✠ SunDawn ✠
(contact)
11:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
P@n@50n1c has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P@n@50n1c until a consensus is reached.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
It's amazing 119.156.29.58 ( talk) 01:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | The contents of the Panasonic (brand) page were merged into Panasonic on 10 October 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Panasonic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
This article is wildly obsolete, quoting Panasonic as a major consumer products manufacturer. it uses references from 20-30 years ago to support its claims, yet Panasonic withdrew entirely from retail consumer electronics following its bankruptcy in the 2000s, and remodeled itself. Stevenmitchell ( talk) 07:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Despite updating certain recent business activities, the article deliberately avoids any mention of Panasonic filing the largest bankruptcy in Japanese history (2015-2016?), with its plasma division, or its other setbacks. Panasonic (along with other Japanese manufacturers) had to retool and withdrew from the consumer retail market. Is this Wikipedia article written by recent company employees or corporate investors? Is that why it omits such significant information? Stevenmitchell ( talk) 07:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi! I have a COI: Panasonic Eco Systems North America (a.k.a. Panasonic Solar US) is a client of my employer, Porter Novelli. I request that a "Panasonic Eco Systems North America" section be added to this article as a subsection of "Current operations". This is a pretty significant portion of Panasonic's business that currently has no mention in the article. Here's the text I propose:
Thank you kindly for any feedback or assistance. Mary Gaulke ( talk) 16:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
References
When I was a student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the summer of 1962, one of my fellow students had a portable radio with the brand name "Matsushita". Some of the other students derided the radio, probably because of anti-Japanese prejudice, and called the radio "Matsa Shit", which I found offensive. That next year I moved to Europe for 4 years, and on returning, noticed that the brand name had been changed to "Panasonic". I couldn't help thinking of the perjorative name that I had heard 4 years before and thought it might have something to do with the name change. In the article, the adoption of the name Panasonic dates from 1961 (for television sets), but based on this indelible memory, I think the chronology might be in error. Of course, before and after the name change, the products have always been of the highest quality. Farogers ( talk) 01:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The essential "meat" of this article is already under the "Brand names" header on the main article for Panasonic. Even the links to the consumer website on each article are identical.
Simply put, there is not enough distinguishing information here to merit a separate article for the Panasonic brand. — That Coptic Guy ( let's talk?) ( contribs) 19:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
MESCO has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5 § MESCO until a consensus is reached.
✠ SunDawn ✠
(contact)
11:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
P@n@50n1c has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P@n@50n1c until a consensus is reached.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
It's amazing 119.156.29.58 ( talk) 01:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)