This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have to admit, this is a poorly maintained a referenced article. I don't know why this talk page has been previously deleted. Can't see the history. How can anyone talk about some changes if there's no talk page to start with? =S
In places like in India or Pakistan, they are mostly stratified societies and they have castes which are "condemned" or the "untouchables". 88.105.11.238 ( talk) 11:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry to say, but whoever wrote this made several serious mistakes. A lot of text is broken, and I have no clue how much is actually lost. I fixed a few myself, but there's probably some stuff missing. Not only that, but I think it should be extended. All the section 'In films and literature' looks at is a minor explanation as to commonplace elements of the outcast, looks at a exactly two characters, then ends. Hell, there's ZERO references here, as stated above. It's in really bad shape. 98.163.235.44 ( talk) 15:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Is there a case for merging parts of this article into Social_rejection? Kaleeyed ( talk) 16:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have to admit, this is a poorly maintained a referenced article. I don't know why this talk page has been previously deleted. Can't see the history. How can anyone talk about some changes if there's no talk page to start with? =S
In places like in India or Pakistan, they are mostly stratified societies and they have castes which are "condemned" or the "untouchables". 88.105.11.238 ( talk) 11:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry to say, but whoever wrote this made several serious mistakes. A lot of text is broken, and I have no clue how much is actually lost. I fixed a few myself, but there's probably some stuff missing. Not only that, but I think it should be extended. All the section 'In films and literature' looks at is a minor explanation as to commonplace elements of the outcast, looks at a exactly two characters, then ends. Hell, there's ZERO references here, as stated above. It's in really bad shape. 98.163.235.44 ( talk) 15:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Is there a case for merging parts of this article into Social_rejection? Kaleeyed ( talk) 16:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)