This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Order of the Golden Kite article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does it make sense to limit new additions to this short list?
Is it appropriate at this stage of the article's development to initiate a standard limiting names on this select list to
This diff is a first step in seeking consensus opinion.
In a context informed by practices which seem to have worked out well at Navy Cross, all new additions who aren't already featured in an article are re-redirected to this talk page section with the following edit history explanation:
The names of those recipients whose award is confirmed by a reliable source, but who do not have an article yet are listed below:
|
|
|
|
In due course, perhaps all or most of these can be restored to the article. -- Tenmei ( talk) 23:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
References
I wonder if the two-colum format is best for this article? Is there a perceived advantage in dividing the lists of recipients into IJA and IJN categories? If so, why? -- Tenmei ( talk) 02:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Upon viewing File:Kinshi4.jpg, I idenitified the weapons on the medal as being different from the current description, as of 14 October 2010. The medal actually depicts, under the kite, two bendwise-crossed straight spears (槍, Yari), and one Tsurugi (剣) point-down. - B. C. Schmerker ( talk) 17:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Order of the Golden Kite article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does it make sense to limit new additions to this short list?
Is it appropriate at this stage of the article's development to initiate a standard limiting names on this select list to
This diff is a first step in seeking consensus opinion.
In a context informed by practices which seem to have worked out well at Navy Cross, all new additions who aren't already featured in an article are re-redirected to this talk page section with the following edit history explanation:
The names of those recipients whose award is confirmed by a reliable source, but who do not have an article yet are listed below:
|
|
|
|
In due course, perhaps all or most of these can be restored to the article. -- Tenmei ( talk) 23:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
References
I wonder if the two-colum format is best for this article? Is there a perceived advantage in dividing the lists of recipients into IJA and IJN categories? If so, why? -- Tenmei ( talk) 02:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Upon viewing File:Kinshi4.jpg, I idenitified the weapons on the medal as being different from the current description, as of 14 October 2010. The medal actually depicts, under the kite, two bendwise-crossed straight spears (槍, Yari), and one Tsurugi (剣) point-down. - B. C. Schmerker ( talk) 17:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)