![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Currently the page is under the title "One Piece (upcoming TV series)". At the moment it has been confirmed to be released in 2023, and I'm not saying to change the name now, because I don't know if it's better to wait for a specific release date, but... Suppose we change it to "One Piece (2023 TV series)": Will it stay with that title while the page about the anime series of the same title will simply stay with the title "One Piece (TV series)"? (since in the talk page of that article it seems that naming it to "One Piece (1999 TV series)" has been rejected) - BrookTheHumming ( talk) 20:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The source of the quoted $150 million budget, as reported on by numerous anime outlets, is a tweet made by a series fan. It's speculation, not reliable insider information. Additionally, the Wiki itself even got that figure wrong. I did some digging and I think someone got confused, because $144 million is not the reported budget of the 2023 TV series--- $144 million is reportedly how much the One Piece Film Red movie sold in the Japanese box office after five months in theaters. Cadenrock1 ( talk) 04:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
We found our source but someone can fact-check me first as you can never know.
The pages of composers Sonya Belousova and Giona Ostinelli must be updated with the One Piece soundtrack. 2A02:2454:25A:C400:ECF4:4E05:36F4:F140 ( talk) 13:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
descriptions source supposedly the collider article. practically every character blurb cites the same article. upon simple investigation, it's clear whoever wrote them completely fabricated and falsely cited collider. not to mention, the writing is awful and deficient in grammar, style, and function. stop otaku fanboys from writing this kind of garbage. SollyWIKI ( talk) 05:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This is being edited out despite multiple reliable sources from CBR animenewsnetwork animefeminist linked.
This is noteworthy and deserves its own section. LoreVogel1995 ( talk) 23:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Currently the cast is listed appropriately in the article. But once a second season is released, with double the cast listed, which would take up a lot of space in the article, we may have to create a page as «List of One Piece (2023 TV series) cast and characters» (mentioning only the Main Cast in the main article about the series).
Perhaps most appropriate listing them on tables (I give as examples lists like
Grey's Anatomy or
Lost; mentioning the character, actor, season(s) in which it appears, perhaps the first episode in which the character appears (or only episode, in the case of notable guest characters based on other characters of the original manga)... followed by a brief description of the character or also additional production notes regarding the character or actor who plays it.
In the case of Recurring Characters also adding the sections "Introduced in season one" and "Introduced in season two" to aid navigation in the list. But currently it's just a proposal for a possible future page, so perhaps it's more appropriate to talk about it once the cast for the second season begins to be announced.
BrookTheHumming (
talk)
22:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Why I cannot find any information about its budget within this article? 2600:6C44:117F:95BE:C539:1FB0:5B12:BDA6 ( talk) 10:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
"In its debut weekend, the show's concurrent viewership on Netflix reached number one in 86 countries, surpassing the Netflix debut records previously set by Stranger Things and Wednesday." this is false. It spread from a fan site tracking netflix rankings with obfsucated method.
According to netflix press release here It only debuted 1st in 46 countries. https://about.netflix.com/en/news/top-10-week-of-aug-28-one-piece-and-you-are-so-not-invited-to-my-bat-mitzvah . And actual viewership was far far lower than them.
It only debuted 2nd in the US rankings. https://www.netflix.com/tudum/top10/
all of these are official and the primary source here.
@ Sariel Xilo. why are you insistent on keeping it? and @ Isabelle Belato can you fix this? 110.235.219.38 ( talk) 05:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 103.250.137.180 ( talk) 13:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
"spread from a fan site tracking netflix rankings with obfsucated method"? At most, we can include both claims, but that would make the sentence rather clunky, and if we were to keep only one, I believe the information provided by The Independent would be preferred on the basis of being newer and being a secondary source. Liu1126 ( talk) 16:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Given that the old Forbes.com article about this was removed, and I think that it is very relevant to mention in this article, would the following source be acceptable instead, or does anybody else here know of a better source that can be used instead?
https://movieweb.com/netflixs-one-piece-live-action-sets-sail-with-strong-rotten-tomatoes-ratings/
David A ( talk) 19:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Please note WP:UGC and MOS:TVRECEPTION which both strongly discourage adding Rotten Tomatoes audience scores. There are rare exceptions but I do not believe this is one of them. The Rotten Tomatoes audience score should not have be added without clear consensus that an exception should be made and considerably better sourcing than Screenrant or IGN India. Please remove the Rotten Tomatoes audience scores unless and until there is a clear consensus that this case is exceptional. -- 109.77.197.70 ( talk) 12:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
I saw a source from March 2022 saying the codename for this show was "Project Panda" [4] but the article contains an Instagram post from 2021 that implies the codename was "Project Roger". [5] Is one of these codenames incorrect? Could both codenames have been used at different times? -- 109.76.136.1 ( talk) 16:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
@ 98Tigerius: the United States is mentioned in the infobox so I do not understand why you would want to remove the article from the American category. The article is also in several other American categories for that matter. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Currently the page is under the title "One Piece (upcoming TV series)". At the moment it has been confirmed to be released in 2023, and I'm not saying to change the name now, because I don't know if it's better to wait for a specific release date, but... Suppose we change it to "One Piece (2023 TV series)": Will it stay with that title while the page about the anime series of the same title will simply stay with the title "One Piece (TV series)"? (since in the talk page of that article it seems that naming it to "One Piece (1999 TV series)" has been rejected) - BrookTheHumming ( talk) 20:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The source of the quoted $150 million budget, as reported on by numerous anime outlets, is a tweet made by a series fan. It's speculation, not reliable insider information. Additionally, the Wiki itself even got that figure wrong. I did some digging and I think someone got confused, because $144 million is not the reported budget of the 2023 TV series--- $144 million is reportedly how much the One Piece Film Red movie sold in the Japanese box office after five months in theaters. Cadenrock1 ( talk) 04:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
We found our source but someone can fact-check me first as you can never know.
The pages of composers Sonya Belousova and Giona Ostinelli must be updated with the One Piece soundtrack. 2A02:2454:25A:C400:ECF4:4E05:36F4:F140 ( talk) 13:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
descriptions source supposedly the collider article. practically every character blurb cites the same article. upon simple investigation, it's clear whoever wrote them completely fabricated and falsely cited collider. not to mention, the writing is awful and deficient in grammar, style, and function. stop otaku fanboys from writing this kind of garbage. SollyWIKI ( talk) 05:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This is being edited out despite multiple reliable sources from CBR animenewsnetwork animefeminist linked.
This is noteworthy and deserves its own section. LoreVogel1995 ( talk) 23:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Currently the cast is listed appropriately in the article. But once a second season is released, with double the cast listed, which would take up a lot of space in the article, we may have to create a page as «List of One Piece (2023 TV series) cast and characters» (mentioning only the Main Cast in the main article about the series).
Perhaps most appropriate listing them on tables (I give as examples lists like
Grey's Anatomy or
Lost; mentioning the character, actor, season(s) in which it appears, perhaps the first episode in which the character appears (or only episode, in the case of notable guest characters based on other characters of the original manga)... followed by a brief description of the character or also additional production notes regarding the character or actor who plays it.
In the case of Recurring Characters also adding the sections "Introduced in season one" and "Introduced in season two" to aid navigation in the list. But currently it's just a proposal for a possible future page, so perhaps it's more appropriate to talk about it once the cast for the second season begins to be announced.
BrookTheHumming (
talk)
22:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Why I cannot find any information about its budget within this article? 2600:6C44:117F:95BE:C539:1FB0:5B12:BDA6 ( talk) 10:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
"In its debut weekend, the show's concurrent viewership on Netflix reached number one in 86 countries, surpassing the Netflix debut records previously set by Stranger Things and Wednesday." this is false. It spread from a fan site tracking netflix rankings with obfsucated method.
According to netflix press release here It only debuted 1st in 46 countries. https://about.netflix.com/en/news/top-10-week-of-aug-28-one-piece-and-you-are-so-not-invited-to-my-bat-mitzvah . And actual viewership was far far lower than them.
It only debuted 2nd in the US rankings. https://www.netflix.com/tudum/top10/
all of these are official and the primary source here.
@ Sariel Xilo. why are you insistent on keeping it? and @ Isabelle Belato can you fix this? 110.235.219.38 ( talk) 05:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 103.250.137.180 ( talk) 13:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
"spread from a fan site tracking netflix rankings with obfsucated method"? At most, we can include both claims, but that would make the sentence rather clunky, and if we were to keep only one, I believe the information provided by The Independent would be preferred on the basis of being newer and being a secondary source. Liu1126 ( talk) 16:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Given that the old Forbes.com article about this was removed, and I think that it is very relevant to mention in this article, would the following source be acceptable instead, or does anybody else here know of a better source that can be used instead?
https://movieweb.com/netflixs-one-piece-live-action-sets-sail-with-strong-rotten-tomatoes-ratings/
David A ( talk) 19:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Please note WP:UGC and MOS:TVRECEPTION which both strongly discourage adding Rotten Tomatoes audience scores. There are rare exceptions but I do not believe this is one of them. The Rotten Tomatoes audience score should not have be added without clear consensus that an exception should be made and considerably better sourcing than Screenrant or IGN India. Please remove the Rotten Tomatoes audience scores unless and until there is a clear consensus that this case is exceptional. -- 109.77.197.70 ( talk) 12:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
I saw a source from March 2022 saying the codename for this show was "Project Panda" [4] but the article contains an Instagram post from 2021 that implies the codename was "Project Roger". [5] Is one of these codenames incorrect? Could both codenames have been used at different times? -- 109.76.136.1 ( talk) 16:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
@ 98Tigerius: the United States is mentioned in the infobox so I do not understand why you would want to remove the article from the American category. The article is also in several other American categories for that matter. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)