 Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Welcome to my talk page. Please add any discussion under this line. If you are responding to a post made on another talk page, including a user talk page, please respond there. Thank you. RetroCosmos ( talk) 10:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi - the changes that I have made to the the Wiki entry for Adele Raemer were done because I AM Adele Raemer and I corrected some inaccuracies and added addition information. How can those changes which I have made about MYSELF, be accepted? Thank you
Zioness on the Border (
talk) 10:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there, with regard to biographies for living persons, which applies to the article in your name, all information must be sourced. We cannot just take your word for it, though we may accept information from interviews, such as the one done with the Hungarian Conservative. This is to protect you. Otherwise, anyone can just go on Wikipedia and start writing anything they want about you, including false or libellous information. If you wish to include information about your life, such as your family, you should include a source. Typically, for a case such as yours, it would be a news article or interview.
- That being said, if you are Adele Raemer, you should not edit your own article. Typically, editors can detect on a face-value reading whether an edit made has clues pointing to conflict of interest editing. This may lead to a block. I would suggest using the talk page of the article
Talk:Adele Raemer where you can make a COI edit request and editors will fulfill them for you. Please note that edit requests must be detailed - in other words, they must list exactly what you want to add, and they must also be sourced - see above. Thanks
RetroCosmos (
talk) 10:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I AM Adele Raemer. How do I resource changes that I, myself, make about me? There are things here that are incorrect. I am clearly still living, so how can I go about making my page more accurate?
Zioness on the Border (
talk) 13:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- please detail the changes you wish to be made at Talk:Adele Raemer and specify which parts are incorrect. if for example you are not of russian origin, that could be struck, but without a source we can't put down that you're of austrian-hungarian origin since you didn't provide a source for that and wikipedia is not a source of original information. in other words, all entries must include a link to another place that says the same thing RetroCosmos ( talk) 16:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I AM Adele Raemer. How do I resource changes that I, myself, make about me? There are things here that are incorrect. I am clearly still living, so how can I go about making my page more accurate?
Zioness on the Border (
talk) 13:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Your reversion of The Liberal Catholic Church on 2 January, to its highly shortened form is extreme, undoing all the work I did to correct it.
- I made the article MORE neutral and INFORMATIVE, not less neutral, and I included MORE sources.
- Here are the issues with your version:
- 1) The article is FAR too short and ambiguous and makes it sound like there are lots of churches using the title "Liberal Catholic Church". There is ONE defined international organisation that uses the name "Liberal Catholic Church". There is another called "The Liberal Catholic Church INTERNATIONAL" and there are some offshoots. But only ONE organisation uses the term "The Liberal Catholic Church".
- 2) The section Young Rite is FAR too long and makes it sound like a major sect. It's not. In fact that offshoot is moribund and doesn't hold mass anywhere.
- 3) The details about Wedgwood's resignation due to "sexual misconduct with juveniles" belongs on the page about WEDGWOOD, not the church itself, especially given that the article is so short. Compared this to the page on the Catholic Church which only includes sexual misconduct in a small section of the page despite it being a mult-billion dollar scandal over decades. In fact, coupled with needlessly extensive discussion about the Young Rite, it actually looks like someone from the Young Rite went on the original article from years ago, defaced it and shorteneed it to make the Liberal Catholic Church look disorganised, undefined, and that the Young Rite is somehow the successor of the organisation, which it is NOT. In fact it is incredibly hard to find people practising the Young Rite.
- 4) If you have a problem with my previous edit, take the time to fix it, rather deleting the article wholesale and replacing it with this extremely short and vague article which looks like it was written with the intent of dismissing the ACTUAL EXTANT ORGANIZATION Called the "Liberal Catholic Church" in favour of The Young Rite. The information I uploaded is factually correct, and cites the correct sources. If you have a problem with sources, please cite "dubious source" first, rather than removing all the work I put in.
Eol Gurgwathren (
talk) 12:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- That you know a great deal about the church while simultaneously insisting on the use of deprecated and primary sources leads me to ask: are you related to the church in any way? RetroCosmos ( talk) 13:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, RetroCosmos. Thank you for your work on Crappytire.com. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 18:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
FYI: Josh Cahill, which you've contributed to, is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Cahill. Jpatokal ( talk) 23:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry if this redundant, but I didn't want my reply to go unnoticed!
—————————
Hello! I'm sorry for the late reply, but I'm a native speaker of Malayalam, and I can attest to the fact that modern Malayalam vocab is still heavily influenced by Sanskrit! Take this translation of what I just said for example:
നമസ്കാരം! മറുപടി മറുപടി വൈകിയതിൽ ക്ഷമ ചൊദിക്കുനു, മലയാളം എന്റെ മാതൃഭാഷ ആന്, പക്ഷേ ആധുനിക മലയാളം പദാവലി ഇപ്പോഴും സംസ്കൃതത്തിന്റെ സ്വാധീനത്തിലാണ് എന്ന് എനിക്ക് സാക്ഷ്യപ്പെടുത്താൻ കഴിയും!
Transliterated as (with Sanskrit loanwords and roots emboldened*):
namaskāram! marupadi vaīkiyathin kśema ćōdhikkunu, malayāļam ente mathr̥bhaśa ānŭ, pakśe ādhunika malayāļam padhāvali ippozhum samskr̥thatthinte svadhīnatthilānņŭ ennŭ ennikŭ sākśyappedutthān kazhiyum!
To eliminate translation bias - i.e. to translate it in a way that would be used in everyday Malayalam - I used google translate to convert the paragraph, and I had my mother correct any errors.
Admittedly, Malayalam is in many ways similar to English, where you can choose between an abundance of Germanic or Romance synonyms,
but this translation is done with as directly as possible, foregoing any bells, whistles, or excessive formality**.
As we can see, over half of the words used here are Sanskrit loanwords, therefore I believe that my point that modern Malayalam is still heavily reliant on those Sanskritisms that are described as "seldom used."
- I used wiktionary as a source for the etymologies for these words.
** For instance, words like pakśe, ćodhiyam (as in ćodhikkunu), sakśyappeduka (as in sākśyappedutthān) are all rather informal, with pakśe rarely being used outside of colloquial speech.
————————— On a personal note, I noticed that you're Singaporean on your page, and I used to live there too! Small world! The malay word Singapura also derives from Sanskrit, which I think is awesome :) Luna Netto ( talk) 20:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with article Zoran Kalabić. Would you be so kind to check also Arno Gujon in the same way and give me some feedback on talk page? Thanks -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk) 22:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Welcome to my talk page. Please add any discussion under this line. If you are responding to a post made on another talk page, including a user talk page, please respond there. Thank you. RetroCosmos ( talk) 10:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi - the changes that I have made to the the Wiki entry for Adele Raemer were done because I AM Adele Raemer and I corrected some inaccuracies and added addition information. How can those changes which I have made about MYSELF, be accepted? Thank you
Zioness on the Border (
talk) 10:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there, with regard to biographies for living persons, which applies to the article in your name, all information must be sourced. We cannot just take your word for it, though we may accept information from interviews, such as the one done with the Hungarian Conservative. This is to protect you. Otherwise, anyone can just go on Wikipedia and start writing anything they want about you, including false or libellous information. If you wish to include information about your life, such as your family, you should include a source. Typically, for a case such as yours, it would be a news article or interview.
- That being said, if you are Adele Raemer, you should not edit your own article. Typically, editors can detect on a face-value reading whether an edit made has clues pointing to conflict of interest editing. This may lead to a block. I would suggest using the talk page of the article
Talk:Adele Raemer where you can make a COI edit request and editors will fulfill them for you. Please note that edit requests must be detailed - in other words, they must list exactly what you want to add, and they must also be sourced - see above. Thanks
RetroCosmos (
talk) 10:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I AM Adele Raemer. How do I resource changes that I, myself, make about me? There are things here that are incorrect. I am clearly still living, so how can I go about making my page more accurate?
Zioness on the Border (
talk) 13:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- please detail the changes you wish to be made at Talk:Adele Raemer and specify which parts are incorrect. if for example you are not of russian origin, that could be struck, but without a source we can't put down that you're of austrian-hungarian origin since you didn't provide a source for that and wikipedia is not a source of original information. in other words, all entries must include a link to another place that says the same thing RetroCosmos ( talk) 16:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I AM Adele Raemer. How do I resource changes that I, myself, make about me? There are things here that are incorrect. I am clearly still living, so how can I go about making my page more accurate?
Zioness on the Border (
talk) 13:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Your reversion of The Liberal Catholic Church on 2 January, to its highly shortened form is extreme, undoing all the work I did to correct it.
- I made the article MORE neutral and INFORMATIVE, not less neutral, and I included MORE sources.
- Here are the issues with your version:
- 1) The article is FAR too short and ambiguous and makes it sound like there are lots of churches using the title "Liberal Catholic Church". There is ONE defined international organisation that uses the name "Liberal Catholic Church". There is another called "The Liberal Catholic Church INTERNATIONAL" and there are some offshoots. But only ONE organisation uses the term "The Liberal Catholic Church".
- 2) The section Young Rite is FAR too long and makes it sound like a major sect. It's not. In fact that offshoot is moribund and doesn't hold mass anywhere.
- 3) The details about Wedgwood's resignation due to "sexual misconduct with juveniles" belongs on the page about WEDGWOOD, not the church itself, especially given that the article is so short. Compared this to the page on the Catholic Church which only includes sexual misconduct in a small section of the page despite it being a mult-billion dollar scandal over decades. In fact, coupled with needlessly extensive discussion about the Young Rite, it actually looks like someone from the Young Rite went on the original article from years ago, defaced it and shorteneed it to make the Liberal Catholic Church look disorganised, undefined, and that the Young Rite is somehow the successor of the organisation, which it is NOT. In fact it is incredibly hard to find people practising the Young Rite.
- 4) If you have a problem with my previous edit, take the time to fix it, rather deleting the article wholesale and replacing it with this extremely short and vague article which looks like it was written with the intent of dismissing the ACTUAL EXTANT ORGANIZATION Called the "Liberal Catholic Church" in favour of The Young Rite. The information I uploaded is factually correct, and cites the correct sources. If you have a problem with sources, please cite "dubious source" first, rather than removing all the work I put in.
Eol Gurgwathren (
talk) 12:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- That you know a great deal about the church while simultaneously insisting on the use of deprecated and primary sources leads me to ask: are you related to the church in any way? RetroCosmos ( talk) 13:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, RetroCosmos. Thank you for your work on Crappytire.com. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 18:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
FYI: Josh Cahill, which you've contributed to, is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Cahill. Jpatokal ( talk) 23:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry if this redundant, but I didn't want my reply to go unnoticed!
—————————
Hello! I'm sorry for the late reply, but I'm a native speaker of Malayalam, and I can attest to the fact that modern Malayalam vocab is still heavily influenced by Sanskrit! Take this translation of what I just said for example:
നമസ്കാരം! മറുപടി മറുപടി വൈകിയതിൽ ക്ഷമ ചൊദിക്കുനു, മലയാളം എന്റെ മാതൃഭാഷ ആന്, പക്ഷേ ആധുനിക മലയാളം പദാവലി ഇപ്പോഴും സംസ്കൃതത്തിന്റെ സ്വാധീനത്തിലാണ് എന്ന് എനിക്ക് സാക്ഷ്യപ്പെടുത്താൻ കഴിയും!
Transliterated as (with Sanskrit loanwords and roots emboldened*):
namaskāram! marupadi vaīkiyathin kśema ćōdhikkunu, malayāļam ente mathr̥bhaśa ānŭ, pakśe ādhunika malayāļam padhāvali ippozhum samskr̥thatthinte svadhīnatthilānņŭ ennŭ ennikŭ sākśyappedutthān kazhiyum!
To eliminate translation bias - i.e. to translate it in a way that would be used in everyday Malayalam - I used google translate to convert the paragraph, and I had my mother correct any errors.
Admittedly, Malayalam is in many ways similar to English, where you can choose between an abundance of Germanic or Romance synonyms,
but this translation is done with as directly as possible, foregoing any bells, whistles, or excessive formality**.
As we can see, over half of the words used here are Sanskrit loanwords, therefore I believe that my point that modern Malayalam is still heavily reliant on those Sanskritisms that are described as "seldom used."
- I used wiktionary as a source for the etymologies for these words.
** For instance, words like pakśe, ćodhiyam (as in ćodhikkunu), sakśyappeduka (as in sākśyappedutthān) are all rather informal, with pakśe rarely being used outside of colloquial speech.
————————— On a personal note, I noticed that you're Singaporean on your page, and I used to live there too! Small world! The malay word Singapura also derives from Sanskrit, which I think is awesome :) Luna Netto ( talk) 20:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with article Zoran Kalabić. Would you be so kind to check also Arno Gujon in the same way and give me some feedback on talk page? Thanks -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk) 22:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)