![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(What exactly are the relations of Snail on the Slope and the Noon Universe? Personaly, I don't see any. One of the variants of this story (with different set of characters) called Bespokojstvo shares some characters with the Noon Universe.) (note by User:Misha Stepanov)
There are two variants of "Ulitka na sklone", see, e.g., http://rusf.ru/abs/books/uns00.htm and http://rusf.ru/abs/books/b00.htm . The first one is canonic text of it, the history of the 2nd variant (that at least has connections with the Noon Universe because of overlaping characters) can be read at the beginning of http://lib.ru/STRUGACKIE/bespokoj.txt or in http://rusf.ru/abs/books/bns-04.htm . BTW, the external link on the "Noon_Universe" page that is http://eressea.ru/portal/mpol/index.shtml mentions "Bespokojstvo" as a part of the Noon Universe (another external link should be changed as chronicle of XXII century, not of the Noon Universe, since it does not cover "Zhuk v muravejnike", "Paren' iz preispodnej" i "Volny gasyat veter").(Wirtten by User:Misha Stepanov.)
Please sign yor posts. Mikkalai 18:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Please don't forget that Noon Universe is not author's notion. What is and what is not is a matter of agreement of fans, not of some scientific research. Anyway, please keep in mind wikipedia's policy about original research and WP:NPOV. It is not our job to define what is and what is not. If some book is listed somewhere as from "Noon Universe", so be it. If there is a disagreement, describe it, but not take sides. Mikkalai 18:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Would it be a copyright violation if I added the brief chronology of XXII century to the article? I am not quite sure whether it has been ever published in English... -- Koveras 15:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Hello, everybody. :) I just wanted to say that we need to coordinate our actions... What will be the "canonical" translation of "Волны гасят ветер": " Waves Put Out Wind" or " The Time Wanderers"? I mean, what is the article's name going to be? -- Koveras 18:04, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Should the Luden be listed as a race? IMHO they should. -- Staecker 19:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
They would be nice. Some book covers, perhaps?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Considering how ugly the two templates look together in the Beetle in an Anthill article, I'd say we create a new nav-template, one that will contain not only the novels but also planets, personalities and so on (similary to {{ .hack//TEMPLATE}}, {{ Firefly}} and {{ Vampirechronicles}}). Since such templates are usually placed at the bottom of the page, it should deal with the problem of looks. :) If no one objects, I'll go ahead and make it, then. -- Koveras 06:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Apparently, following articles should be renamed:
I can do that myself, but I wanted to let everybody know first. -- Koveras 10:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kynoid
Can someone help? I'm no good with such things. :( -- Koveras ☭ 12:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Does that mean internal or external chronology? i.e., does Noon describe the earliest fictional events, or was it the first to be published? (If both, why the adverb?) — Tamfang ( talk) 09:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
These books are getting coverage in the papers because people have highlighted the parallels with the film Avatar - I picked up via The Guardian [1] but there is a lot of coverage both in Russian and English-language papers [2]. It might be worth a section at the end quickly outlining the issues as people will be arriving here looking for more information. ( Emperor ( talk) 16:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC))
There seem to be an unreasonable number of sub-articles related to this series, many of which don't seen notable in their own right. I'm hesitant, though, to pursue deletion because I'm sure they have valid content worth merging to the main article or an article for a given text, and having never read any of the books I wouldn't be able to distinguish that content from content that can safely be discarded. Any ideas? – hysteria18 ( talk) 16:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | The contents of the Less significant planets in the Noon Universe page were merged into Noon Universe on 17 May 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the Ark (Noon Universe) page were merged into Noon Universe on 17 May 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Just heads up that while most Noon Universe fancruft articles were deleted, I've transwikid them to https://noon-universe.fandom.com/wiki/Noon_Universe_Wiki . So anyone looking for more details, check that site out. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(What exactly are the relations of Snail on the Slope and the Noon Universe? Personaly, I don't see any. One of the variants of this story (with different set of characters) called Bespokojstvo shares some characters with the Noon Universe.) (note by User:Misha Stepanov)
There are two variants of "Ulitka na sklone", see, e.g., http://rusf.ru/abs/books/uns00.htm and http://rusf.ru/abs/books/b00.htm . The first one is canonic text of it, the history of the 2nd variant (that at least has connections with the Noon Universe because of overlaping characters) can be read at the beginning of http://lib.ru/STRUGACKIE/bespokoj.txt or in http://rusf.ru/abs/books/bns-04.htm . BTW, the external link on the "Noon_Universe" page that is http://eressea.ru/portal/mpol/index.shtml mentions "Bespokojstvo" as a part of the Noon Universe (another external link should be changed as chronicle of XXII century, not of the Noon Universe, since it does not cover "Zhuk v muravejnike", "Paren' iz preispodnej" i "Volny gasyat veter").(Wirtten by User:Misha Stepanov.)
Please sign yor posts. Mikkalai 18:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Please don't forget that Noon Universe is not author's notion. What is and what is not is a matter of agreement of fans, not of some scientific research. Anyway, please keep in mind wikipedia's policy about original research and WP:NPOV. It is not our job to define what is and what is not. If some book is listed somewhere as from "Noon Universe", so be it. If there is a disagreement, describe it, but not take sides. Mikkalai 18:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Would it be a copyright violation if I added the brief chronology of XXII century to the article? I am not quite sure whether it has been ever published in English... -- Koveras 15:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Hello, everybody. :) I just wanted to say that we need to coordinate our actions... What will be the "canonical" translation of "Волны гасят ветер": " Waves Put Out Wind" or " The Time Wanderers"? I mean, what is the article's name going to be? -- Koveras 18:04, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Should the Luden be listed as a race? IMHO they should. -- Staecker 19:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
They would be nice. Some book covers, perhaps?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Considering how ugly the two templates look together in the Beetle in an Anthill article, I'd say we create a new nav-template, one that will contain not only the novels but also planets, personalities and so on (similary to {{ .hack//TEMPLATE}}, {{ Firefly}} and {{ Vampirechronicles}}). Since such templates are usually placed at the bottom of the page, it should deal with the problem of looks. :) If no one objects, I'll go ahead and make it, then. -- Koveras 06:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Apparently, following articles should be renamed:
I can do that myself, but I wanted to let everybody know first. -- Koveras 10:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kynoid
Can someone help? I'm no good with such things. :( -- Koveras ☭ 12:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Does that mean internal or external chronology? i.e., does Noon describe the earliest fictional events, or was it the first to be published? (If both, why the adverb?) — Tamfang ( talk) 09:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
These books are getting coverage in the papers because people have highlighted the parallels with the film Avatar - I picked up via The Guardian [1] but there is a lot of coverage both in Russian and English-language papers [2]. It might be worth a section at the end quickly outlining the issues as people will be arriving here looking for more information. ( Emperor ( talk) 16:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC))
There seem to be an unreasonable number of sub-articles related to this series, many of which don't seen notable in their own right. I'm hesitant, though, to pursue deletion because I'm sure they have valid content worth merging to the main article or an article for a given text, and having never read any of the books I wouldn't be able to distinguish that content from content that can safely be discarded. Any ideas? – hysteria18 ( talk) 16:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | The contents of the Less significant planets in the Noon Universe page were merged into Noon Universe on 17 May 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the Ark (Noon Universe) page were merged into Noon Universe on 17 May 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Just heads up that while most Noon Universe fancruft articles were deleted, I've transwikid them to https://noon-universe.fandom.com/wiki/Noon_Universe_Wiki . So anyone looking for more details, check that site out. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)