![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My understanding from the previous discussions about this, on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nimona (film) and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Nimona (film) along with a list of past deletions on Draft:Nimona (film) was that the content from the film would stay merged into the Nimona page after the film's cancellation. That was my understanding of the consensus, perhaps falling into WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. However, that has thrown into question because Starzoner who participated in the aformentioned discussion and moved the content to the Nimona page has been suspended as a sockpuppet account since then. And consensus can change, per WP:CCC and WP:CON. So, I'd like some discussion on whether this page should exist or if the content from it should be merged into the Nimona#Cancelled film section, with this page not deleted but turned into a redirect. At the same time, there is some precedent for having pages for cancelled TV series like The Boondocks, Bruce Wayne, Buffy: The Animated Series, Deadpool, and Star Trek: Phase II and the over 45 films listed at Category:Unreleased films, so that is in favor of keeping this page as it is now. The record indicates that Starzoner boldly changed it to a redirect at the time of the film's cancellation, and there wasn't any discussion about it on the Talk:Nimona nor Talk:Nimona (film) pages. There was only a general agreement between editors in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nimona (film) and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Nimona (film) discussions.
As such, I'm pinging those who contributed to this either in discussions or edits on the Nimona page about the cancelled film, like @ User:Godsy, @ User:Zack41Attack, @ User:Bovineboy2008, @ User:$uperFan32, @ User talk:czar, @ User:Trivialist, @ User:AndreierdnA, @ User:Fanoflionking, @ User:Captain Assassin!, @ User talk:Reach Out to the Truth, @ User:Lennart97, @ CycloneYoris, and @ User:HenryCrun15. And @ User:ZX2006XZ, if you wouldn't mind participating as well, since you created this page. -- Historyday01 ( talk) 20:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
My guess is to leave the article as is. I mean, it is notable. ZX2006XZ ( talk) 02:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Animation365 ( talk) 13:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)It's sad that Blue Sky Studios is closed on April 10, 2021 due to current "economic realities" related to COVID-19. It's up to me, Matthew Davidson to revive the film by writing and sending letters to 20th Century Animation to produce it in-house by using the 75% completed parts of the movie originally produced by Blue Sky Studios (uncredited).
As we all know, this film was recently revived. There's currently an edit war going on RN on whether or not to still list 20th Century Animation and Blue Sky Studios as production companies, since, well, the production was started under them. What does everyone think? Should we still list them or not? Voice your comments here. TheVHSArtist ( talk) 01:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
20th Century Studios, Blue Sky Studios, and Vertigo Entertainment worked on the film before its cancellation by Disney, but were not credited in the final film, which listed Annapurna Pictures as the production company.
Yeah. I believe that they should be listed. ZX2006XZ ( talk) 02:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I agree with Cree, unless the film comes out and their shown uncredited, then they should be removed. But until then, they should remain listed. SlySabre ( talk) 19:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I think they should be included unless the film comes out and they aren't credited. -- Historyday01 ( talk) 20:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
My two cents are that if we have a sources, we can put it on the infobox. Generally the infobox shouldn't be the only thing we go by. Plenty of film articles put production companies that weren't listed in the infobox but have sources for. IAmNMFlores ( talk) 19:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My understanding from the previous discussions about this, on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nimona (film) and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Nimona (film) along with a list of past deletions on Draft:Nimona (film) was that the content from the film would stay merged into the Nimona page after the film's cancellation. That was my understanding of the consensus, perhaps falling into WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. However, that has thrown into question because Starzoner who participated in the aformentioned discussion and moved the content to the Nimona page has been suspended as a sockpuppet account since then. And consensus can change, per WP:CCC and WP:CON. So, I'd like some discussion on whether this page should exist or if the content from it should be merged into the Nimona#Cancelled film section, with this page not deleted but turned into a redirect. At the same time, there is some precedent for having pages for cancelled TV series like The Boondocks, Bruce Wayne, Buffy: The Animated Series, Deadpool, and Star Trek: Phase II and the over 45 films listed at Category:Unreleased films, so that is in favor of keeping this page as it is now. The record indicates that Starzoner boldly changed it to a redirect at the time of the film's cancellation, and there wasn't any discussion about it on the Talk:Nimona nor Talk:Nimona (film) pages. There was only a general agreement between editors in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nimona (film) and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Nimona (film) discussions.
As such, I'm pinging those who contributed to this either in discussions or edits on the Nimona page about the cancelled film, like @ User:Godsy, @ User:Zack41Attack, @ User:Bovineboy2008, @ User:$uperFan32, @ User talk:czar, @ User:Trivialist, @ User:AndreierdnA, @ User:Fanoflionking, @ User:Captain Assassin!, @ User talk:Reach Out to the Truth, @ User:Lennart97, @ CycloneYoris, and @ User:HenryCrun15. And @ User:ZX2006XZ, if you wouldn't mind participating as well, since you created this page. -- Historyday01 ( talk) 20:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
My guess is to leave the article as is. I mean, it is notable. ZX2006XZ ( talk) 02:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Animation365 ( talk) 13:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)It's sad that Blue Sky Studios is closed on April 10, 2021 due to current "economic realities" related to COVID-19. It's up to me, Matthew Davidson to revive the film by writing and sending letters to 20th Century Animation to produce it in-house by using the 75% completed parts of the movie originally produced by Blue Sky Studios (uncredited).
As we all know, this film was recently revived. There's currently an edit war going on RN on whether or not to still list 20th Century Animation and Blue Sky Studios as production companies, since, well, the production was started under them. What does everyone think? Should we still list them or not? Voice your comments here. TheVHSArtist ( talk) 01:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
20th Century Studios, Blue Sky Studios, and Vertigo Entertainment worked on the film before its cancellation by Disney, but were not credited in the final film, which listed Annapurna Pictures as the production company.
Yeah. I believe that they should be listed. ZX2006XZ ( talk) 02:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I agree with Cree, unless the film comes out and their shown uncredited, then they should be removed. But until then, they should remain listed. SlySabre ( talk) 19:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I think they should be included unless the film comes out and they aren't credited. -- Historyday01 ( talk) 20:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
My two cents are that if we have a sources, we can put it on the infobox. Generally the infobox shouldn't be the only thing we go by. Plenty of film articles put production companies that weren't listed in the infobox but have sources for. IAmNMFlores ( talk) 19:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)