This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reverted my late statement User:Lee788. User:Gunkarta has no right to removed that statement without any explanation. This statement have provided with citation and trusted reference. So, why User:Gunkarta not satisfied with this statement then removed that information? Do you think it is good in ethics when you editing in other country page, but in case when others publics want to add some truth information in your country dish, it will removed it by you? Please, for this article, give me a reasonable reason why need remove this statement or if not, i will report it to admin. Thanks User:Lee788. If you to sensitive with your dish, please be sensitive with others. — Preceding undated comment added 07:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nasi Padang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reverted my late statement User:Lee788. User:Gunkarta has no right to removed that statement without any explanation. This statement have provided with citation and trusted reference. So, why User:Gunkarta not satisfied with this statement then removed that information? Do you think it is good in ethics when you editing in other country page, but in case when others publics want to add some truth information in your country dish, it will removed it by you? Please, for this article, give me a reasonable reason why need remove this statement or if not, i will report it to admin. Thanks User:Lee788. If you to sensitive with your dish, please be sensitive with others. — Preceding undated comment added 07:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nasi Padang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)