![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Apologies if I am using this format incorrectly, as I have not been properly trained.
In the profile box, where it says "Occupation", it says "unemployed" alongside "speedrunner". Isn't this inaccurate and unnecessary, considering that Cosmo's main source of income is advertisement revenue from his streams (in addition to donations from his fans)? It seems to me that it is less a statement of fact and more of a pejorative remark on his career choice. - 1/14/2015, 11:43 CST
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I am still working on the article, i only used another article for a template, the finished article will have citations and will look proper.) -- Hamza725 ( talk) 01:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (I only used other information for a template, the finished article will not look like a hoax) -- Hamza725 ( talk) 01:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) -- 80.111.71.69 ( talk) 02:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because what is stated is true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.195.19 ( talk) 02:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) -- 69.17.170.114 ( talk) 02:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Cosmo is a shit speedrunner and nothing is speedy about him Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) -- 74.192.220.23 ( talk) 02:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC) This man is actually legit in case some of wikipedia people didnt know. Sure this isnt complete by any means but dont delete he created a huge online community and deserves credit Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because the information written in it is true, it can be gotten from Cosmos'Twitch channel as well from SpeedRunsLive. Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... Cosmo Wright is real -- 95.176.45.181 ( talk) 02:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because SpeedRunsLive has hosted charity stream that have raised totals of over 1 million dollars for different charities and non-profits. This would not be possible if Cosmo did not help co-found SpeedRunsLive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.41.120.105 ( talk) 02:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Cosmo is notable for holding world records in multiple popular games, many of which are listed on the wikipedia page "games notable for speedrunning".) -- Hamza725 ( talk) 02:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Every game that has been run has a world record, possibly more. The records listed on this page have all been held by multiple people. As for SpeedRunsLive: The website is mostly a stream listing and an IRC Bot. Are these relevant enough to justify a page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.199.57 ( talk) 03:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
See comparison. Simply changing some of the words will not do. This must be mended quickly. I'll be so bold as to ping @ Thehack771 and @ Hamza725 as they are the major contributors to the article. ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 22:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
As per the edit comment I feel it is best to discuss this here rather than start an edit war. The idea the SpeedRunsLive 'team up with' SpeedDemosArchive to host the 'GDQ marathons is incorrect; the marathons are organized solely by SDA and whilst SRL members may attend or even volunteer to help out at these marathons, SpeedRunsLive has absolutly nothing to do with their inception or organization of such marathons. Even the reference cited does not actively mention SRL in such a role. Skullbird11 ( talk) 17:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Do we have consensus? - if so I will take the article back to a stub based on what is currently in the lead. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I have removed everything but the lead and added a stub template. There were only two sources given for all of the content and both were primary. On another article I'd be content to tag with {{ fact}} but this is a BLP. -- Chris (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Cosmo read this page on his stream, a video of this can be seen here ( http://www.twitch.tv/cosmowright/b/499789992 skip to 4:03:50). He has confirmed that everything written on the page is indeed true. I'm not too experienced with references but could this video also be used as a source for uncited information such as his birthday since he says himself that the uncited date is really his birthday? Thehack771 ( talk) 07:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The following text has been restored by another editor:
Is it just me, or does this seem more applicable to the speedrun article? Very little of this content has anything to do with Wright, and the entire section could be summarized as follows:
The rest has to do with speedrunning in general and has only a weak association to Wright. -- Chris (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
The sections and Speedrunning and SpeedRunsLive' are still not necessary in my view. The first confirms he is a speed runner and adds nothing to the subject that isn't in the lead. Much of this paragraph is about Speedrunning, not Cosmo. The second confirms he co-founded the website, then go on to describe the mission of the site rather than his part in founding the site. Again it doesn't really add anything about the subject that isn't in the lead. I contend that both of these sections should be removed. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I had a draft sitting in my userspace, but it looks like someone beat me to it. Here are the sources I had saved, in case anyone's interested:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
czar
♔
12:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia permits the use of original images with the understanding that their contents can be verified by visual inspection. However, the subject of File:Cosmo Wright Nails.png is covering his face with his hands, which renders such verification impossible. I suggest removal of this photograph from the article. DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 23:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Thehack771 ( talk) 04:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The page Cosmo Wright should redirect to existing page Narcissa Wright. On November 3rd, 2015, Narcissa announced her name change on Twitter here. I tried to change it, but it got changed back automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sqronce ( talk • contribs) 00:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to give some points. First off, please stop accusing one another for "vandalizing" as, even if you do not agree with someone's changes, all edits that are made based on Narcissa's identity are in good faith. I am not talking to anyone in specific here: this is just something I have seen thrown around in the edit notes and it is nonsensical. My second point is that I am personally still waiting for somekind of post that is more clear than what we have thusfar. Basically everyone who's opinion I've found through Google since Narcissa made her Carpe Diem post agrees that this means she is transitioning. Sadly, this is very unspecific and Narcissa herself hasn't done more than sharing one picture and changing her name. I wish someone could just ask her, or that some reliable publication would say something about this. Would make our life so much easier.
Right now, it is for us to decide whether Narcissa's post and behavior was explicit enough. I personally believe it was and recommend the Cosmo-article to become a redirect. I don't have too much issue with Narcissa becoming a redirect, but if that happens, I assume it would only be temporary. The situation we are in right now is ridiculous and definitely against Wikipedia's guidelines, but it doesn't really matter much. I just hope we'll get more information soon. ~ Mable ( chat) 14:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
@ Materialscientist:, you're editing against consensus. Explain yourself.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 21:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. → AA ( talk) — 16:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Cosmo Wright →
Narcissa Wright – Cosmo is transitioning to female and took the name Narcissa
Thehack771 (
talk)
21:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Kiyoshiendo ( talk) 22:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
From what I can see, the BLP claims being added appear to be true; but reliable sources are needed. The article has been temporarily protected due to the BLP issue. Once appropriate reliable sources are found, the BLP isse will be resolved and the material can be restored. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 03:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't know if this counts as a reliable source, but Narcissa talks about being trans and the name change and everything a lot on her stream on Twitch. My doubt about it counting is just because you need to be a subscriber to watch the vods, so, I can link one such VOD (like http://www.twitch.tv/narcissawright/v/24603144) but most people won't be able to actually watch it. Can someone who knows more about Wikipedia weigh in on whether this counts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.63.31 ( talk) 00:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
With [1] still locked behind a paywall, could someone please at least extract a quote from it? If nicely formatting is too much to ask, I'd still like to be able for this to be verified in some form. Getting the time in which statements on Narcissa's coming out were made would also greatly improve verifiability. ~ Mable ( chat) 19:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
The career section includes negligible, personal information without appropriate citation. This is strange, considering the thirteen citations for the first paragraph.
In addition, this seems to be self-promotional, these make it seem that it was written by Cosmo/Narcissa themself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.179.67 ( talk) 16:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since they are not legally a female, I suggest keeping pronouns either gender neutral or male. Sanicross ( talk) 19:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
https://twitter.com/narcissawright/status/718203768416772096 https://www.twitch.tv/narcissawright
It appears that she has deleted her twitch account, should the links to it be removed? Or just note that they were deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WindedCone ( talk • contribs) 23:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I don't doubt this is true, but the citation is behind a paywalled video, and needs something else. 86.152.192.133 ( talk) 05:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
@ Jakub.mach: related to this discussion, I'd like to ask you to stop removing a source. Rather, I'd like people to put in some effort verifying the content of this source. ~ Mable ( chat) 23:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I am going to remove the citation because it appears that the video has actually been deleted, so it can't even be verified anymore (unless it can be found on another site). -- Chris (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Thehack771: Is Wright getting harassed WP:POV? The Crave article seems to accept it as fact, and I don't see much reason not to believe it (especially after all the reverting I've had to do on this article...). Is there a reason to believe Wright has not been harassed? I don't really like the way in which the sentence is phrased now, as it feels as though the source suggests this may not actually be true. ~ Mable ( chat) 20:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Kotaku also seems to suggest that there may have been something going on, asking questions like "In light of negativity you’ve received pre- and post-transition, have you ever had moments where you considered leaving the public eye? Even regardless of people being garbage-spewing toilet monsters, does it all just get exhausting, essentially being on stage all the time?". ~ Mable ( chat) 20:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Also on an unrelated note, there is a lot of info in the polygon and Kotaku article that we can use to update the career and personal life sections, these sections don't mention anything about her stream post-transition which is very different . Also if anyone here is a subscriber to Narcissa on twitch, please ask for her to pose for a picture or let us have permission to grab a screen capture of her stream to use as an infobox pic. She has allowed it in the past (before her transition) so I'm sure she would allow it especially because it would replace the artwork of her on the google instant search with a picture she would like more. Thehack771 ( talk) 19:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
correcting vandalism and unnecessary revisions made by a previous editor.
Emberlaine ( talk) 15:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A picture should be provided and updated regularly. Maracont ( talk) 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7xm9yd/one-of-zeldas-greatest-speedrunners-was-just-banned-from-twitch 71.3.195.32 ( talk) 22:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
She returned to speedrunning 4 months later, with games such as 'Beetle Adventure Racing!' [1] and 'Cadence of Hyrule.' [2] On August 20th, 2019, Narcissa began crowdfunding for a documentary of her and her accomplishments. This goal was met on September 21, 2019. [3] As of August 31, 2019, Narcissa Wright has found, and has, a job. [4] ILoweeI ( talk) 23:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Narcissa has confirmed her birthday on her YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLEQJvsQ_GA -- please undo the edit from Homechallenge55 who removed the birthday.
I don't know enough about the sequence of events to make such an addition myself, nor do I know how to properly source such a thing. Hopefully someone more informed on the situation can add the relevant info and sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarioLuigi0404 ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Apologies if I am using this format incorrectly, as I have not been properly trained.
In the profile box, where it says "Occupation", it says "unemployed" alongside "speedrunner". Isn't this inaccurate and unnecessary, considering that Cosmo's main source of income is advertisement revenue from his streams (in addition to donations from his fans)? It seems to me that it is less a statement of fact and more of a pejorative remark on his career choice. - 1/14/2015, 11:43 CST
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I am still working on the article, i only used another article for a template, the finished article will have citations and will look proper.) -- Hamza725 ( talk) 01:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (I only used other information for a template, the finished article will not look like a hoax) -- Hamza725 ( talk) 01:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) -- 80.111.71.69 ( talk) 02:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because what is stated is true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.195.19 ( talk) 02:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) -- 69.17.170.114 ( talk) 02:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Cosmo is a shit speedrunner and nothing is speedy about him Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) -- 74.192.220.23 ( talk) 02:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC) This man is actually legit in case some of wikipedia people didnt know. Sure this isnt complete by any means but dont delete he created a huge online community and deserves credit Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because the information written in it is true, it can be gotten from Cosmos'Twitch channel as well from SpeedRunsLive. Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... Cosmo Wright is real -- 95.176.45.181 ( talk) 02:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because SpeedRunsLive has hosted charity stream that have raised totals of over 1 million dollars for different charities and non-profits. This would not be possible if Cosmo did not help co-found SpeedRunsLive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.41.120.105 ( talk) 02:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Contested deletionThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Cosmo is notable for holding world records in multiple popular games, many of which are listed on the wikipedia page "games notable for speedrunning".) -- Hamza725 ( talk) 02:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Every game that has been run has a world record, possibly more. The records listed on this page have all been held by multiple people. As for SpeedRunsLive: The website is mostly a stream listing and an IRC Bot. Are these relevant enough to justify a page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.199.57 ( talk) 03:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
See comparison. Simply changing some of the words will not do. This must be mended quickly. I'll be so bold as to ping @ Thehack771 and @ Hamza725 as they are the major contributors to the article. ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 22:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
As per the edit comment I feel it is best to discuss this here rather than start an edit war. The idea the SpeedRunsLive 'team up with' SpeedDemosArchive to host the 'GDQ marathons is incorrect; the marathons are organized solely by SDA and whilst SRL members may attend or even volunteer to help out at these marathons, SpeedRunsLive has absolutly nothing to do with their inception or organization of such marathons. Even the reference cited does not actively mention SRL in such a role. Skullbird11 ( talk) 17:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Do we have consensus? - if so I will take the article back to a stub based on what is currently in the lead. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I have removed everything but the lead and added a stub template. There were only two sources given for all of the content and both were primary. On another article I'd be content to tag with {{ fact}} but this is a BLP. -- Chris (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Cosmo read this page on his stream, a video of this can be seen here ( http://www.twitch.tv/cosmowright/b/499789992 skip to 4:03:50). He has confirmed that everything written on the page is indeed true. I'm not too experienced with references but could this video also be used as a source for uncited information such as his birthday since he says himself that the uncited date is really his birthday? Thehack771 ( talk) 07:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The following text has been restored by another editor:
Is it just me, or does this seem more applicable to the speedrun article? Very little of this content has anything to do with Wright, and the entire section could be summarized as follows:
The rest has to do with speedrunning in general and has only a weak association to Wright. -- Chris (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
The sections and Speedrunning and SpeedRunsLive' are still not necessary in my view. The first confirms he is a speed runner and adds nothing to the subject that isn't in the lead. Much of this paragraph is about Speedrunning, not Cosmo. The second confirms he co-founded the website, then go on to describe the mission of the site rather than his part in founding the site. Again it doesn't really add anything about the subject that isn't in the lead. I contend that both of these sections should be removed. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I had a draft sitting in my userspace, but it looks like someone beat me to it. Here are the sources I had saved, in case anyone's interested:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
czar
♔
12:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia permits the use of original images with the understanding that their contents can be verified by visual inspection. However, the subject of File:Cosmo Wright Nails.png is covering his face with his hands, which renders such verification impossible. I suggest removal of this photograph from the article. DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 23:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Thehack771 ( talk) 04:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The page Cosmo Wright should redirect to existing page Narcissa Wright. On November 3rd, 2015, Narcissa announced her name change on Twitter here. I tried to change it, but it got changed back automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sqronce ( talk • contribs) 00:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to give some points. First off, please stop accusing one another for "vandalizing" as, even if you do not agree with someone's changes, all edits that are made based on Narcissa's identity are in good faith. I am not talking to anyone in specific here: this is just something I have seen thrown around in the edit notes and it is nonsensical. My second point is that I am personally still waiting for somekind of post that is more clear than what we have thusfar. Basically everyone who's opinion I've found through Google since Narcissa made her Carpe Diem post agrees that this means she is transitioning. Sadly, this is very unspecific and Narcissa herself hasn't done more than sharing one picture and changing her name. I wish someone could just ask her, or that some reliable publication would say something about this. Would make our life so much easier.
Right now, it is for us to decide whether Narcissa's post and behavior was explicit enough. I personally believe it was and recommend the Cosmo-article to become a redirect. I don't have too much issue with Narcissa becoming a redirect, but if that happens, I assume it would only be temporary. The situation we are in right now is ridiculous and definitely against Wikipedia's guidelines, but it doesn't really matter much. I just hope we'll get more information soon. ~ Mable ( chat) 14:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
@ Materialscientist:, you're editing against consensus. Explain yourself.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 21:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. → AA ( talk) — 16:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Cosmo Wright →
Narcissa Wright – Cosmo is transitioning to female and took the name Narcissa
Thehack771 (
talk)
21:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Kiyoshiendo ( talk) 22:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
From what I can see, the BLP claims being added appear to be true; but reliable sources are needed. The article has been temporarily protected due to the BLP issue. Once appropriate reliable sources are found, the BLP isse will be resolved and the material can be restored. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 03:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't know if this counts as a reliable source, but Narcissa talks about being trans and the name change and everything a lot on her stream on Twitch. My doubt about it counting is just because you need to be a subscriber to watch the vods, so, I can link one such VOD (like http://www.twitch.tv/narcissawright/v/24603144) but most people won't be able to actually watch it. Can someone who knows more about Wikipedia weigh in on whether this counts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.63.31 ( talk) 00:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
With [1] still locked behind a paywall, could someone please at least extract a quote from it? If nicely formatting is too much to ask, I'd still like to be able for this to be verified in some form. Getting the time in which statements on Narcissa's coming out were made would also greatly improve verifiability. ~ Mable ( chat) 19:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
The career section includes negligible, personal information without appropriate citation. This is strange, considering the thirteen citations for the first paragraph.
In addition, this seems to be self-promotional, these make it seem that it was written by Cosmo/Narcissa themself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.179.67 ( talk) 16:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since they are not legally a female, I suggest keeping pronouns either gender neutral or male. Sanicross ( talk) 19:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
https://twitter.com/narcissawright/status/718203768416772096 https://www.twitch.tv/narcissawright
It appears that she has deleted her twitch account, should the links to it be removed? Or just note that they were deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WindedCone ( talk • contribs) 23:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I don't doubt this is true, but the citation is behind a paywalled video, and needs something else. 86.152.192.133 ( talk) 05:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
@ Jakub.mach: related to this discussion, I'd like to ask you to stop removing a source. Rather, I'd like people to put in some effort verifying the content of this source. ~ Mable ( chat) 23:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I am going to remove the citation because it appears that the video has actually been deleted, so it can't even be verified anymore (unless it can be found on another site). -- Chris (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Thehack771: Is Wright getting harassed WP:POV? The Crave article seems to accept it as fact, and I don't see much reason not to believe it (especially after all the reverting I've had to do on this article...). Is there a reason to believe Wright has not been harassed? I don't really like the way in which the sentence is phrased now, as it feels as though the source suggests this may not actually be true. ~ Mable ( chat) 20:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Kotaku also seems to suggest that there may have been something going on, asking questions like "In light of negativity you’ve received pre- and post-transition, have you ever had moments where you considered leaving the public eye? Even regardless of people being garbage-spewing toilet monsters, does it all just get exhausting, essentially being on stage all the time?". ~ Mable ( chat) 20:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Also on an unrelated note, there is a lot of info in the polygon and Kotaku article that we can use to update the career and personal life sections, these sections don't mention anything about her stream post-transition which is very different . Also if anyone here is a subscriber to Narcissa on twitch, please ask for her to pose for a picture or let us have permission to grab a screen capture of her stream to use as an infobox pic. She has allowed it in the past (before her transition) so I'm sure she would allow it especially because it would replace the artwork of her on the google instant search with a picture she would like more. Thehack771 ( talk) 19:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
correcting vandalism and unnecessary revisions made by a previous editor.
Emberlaine ( talk) 15:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A picture should be provided and updated regularly. Maracont ( talk) 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7xm9yd/one-of-zeldas-greatest-speedrunners-was-just-banned-from-twitch 71.3.195.32 ( talk) 22:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
She returned to speedrunning 4 months later, with games such as 'Beetle Adventure Racing!' [1] and 'Cadence of Hyrule.' [2] On August 20th, 2019, Narcissa began crowdfunding for a documentary of her and her accomplishments. This goal was met on September 21, 2019. [3] As of August 31, 2019, Narcissa Wright has found, and has, a job. [4] ILoweeI ( talk) 23:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This
edit request to
Narcissa Wright has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Narcissa has confirmed her birthday on her YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLEQJvsQ_GA -- please undo the edit from Homechallenge55 who removed the birthday.
I don't know enough about the sequence of events to make such an addition myself, nor do I know how to properly source such a thing. Hopefully someone more informed on the situation can add the relevant info and sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarioLuigi0404 ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)