Municipal Asphalt Plant has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 7, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Municipal Asphalt Plant appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 August 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
I'll be adding in the architectural style and the reception towards the design of the municipal asphalt plant later. If anyone has any criticisms of what I've already written in or what I've just suggested, let me know! Qchong5 ( talk) 19:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Municipal Asphalt Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grk1011 ( talk · contribs) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
I will review this one! Grk1011 ( talk) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Epicgenius: A really great article and not much to fix. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 18:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Municipal Asphalt Plant; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: the link to the Johnson (1985) scan isn't legible to me, so I'll AGF.
Municipal Asphalt Plant has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 7, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Municipal Asphalt Plant appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 August 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
I'll be adding in the architectural style and the reception towards the design of the municipal asphalt plant later. If anyone has any criticisms of what I've already written in or what I've just suggested, let me know! Qchong5 ( talk) 19:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Municipal Asphalt Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grk1011 ( talk · contribs) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
I will review this one! Grk1011 ( talk) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Epicgenius: A really great article and not much to fix. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 18:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Municipal Asphalt Plant; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: the link to the Johnson (1985) scan isn't legible to me, so I'll AGF.