This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Louisiana / New Orleans Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Low-importance). Holidays: Christmas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance). Christianity: Christmas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I suggest removing the in-line citations template. I believe that the issue has been adequately addressed. Nolabob ( talk) 13:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC) reply

mrbinglefans.com is not a reliable source. We still have a problem. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 19:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The number and quality of inline citations has now been significantly improved since the inline citations template was first posted for this article. Is the issue considered resolved now? Many thanks for your consideration. Nolabob ( talk) 12:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the good work. Template removed. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 22:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC) reply