|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Fanron comes from where? The press release and Newtype Japan only say Setsuna F. Seiei. :/ The same for "Middle East". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.49.151.44 ( talk • contribs)
Like this one? http://www.gundam00.net/ms/img/01.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.171.6.142 ( talk • contribs)
Okay, the first theme has been added to the Opening/Ending themes. Please, do not delete them -- rather if you have some info. It'd be much appreciated if you would add some themes as well. And also you're welcome to add insert themes when the show gets underway as well.-- Zeta26 08:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
The offical page has numbers 9.29, and I also read somwewhere the same date, so I was wondering which is the correct date for the premiere... 89.133.167.182 18:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Is this really needed? It seems like it's just being used so random fans can add their opinions. The Destiny article once had similar and it became a nightmare of bickering and criticism.-- HellCat86 22:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, this is just a pointless excuse to express subjective and unfavourable opinions about the show. Anime News Network does not represent the viewers reception of Gundam 00 singlehandly. Kaioshin Sama 08:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
IMPORTANT! I've found some impressive data on the 4 Gundams names, technical stats, and possible pictures of each; However, I can't seem to figure out how to cite sources on Wikipedia; can someone load these 4 Adresses as "sources"? They are consistant with the Normal format for Gundam data,and all list the same artist under "designer"(except for Exia), So I have reason to believe legitimacy. Exia: http://www.mahq.net/Mecha/gundam/00/gn-001.htm Dynames: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/00/gn-002.htm Kyrios: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/00/gn-003.htm Virtue: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/00/gn-005.htm
Agian, this is Important because I can't add the "gundams" section without sources being loaded; otherwise It'll be deleted shortly thereafter. Shotesu 21:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticied that in the first episode everyone who was in the orbital elevator was floating. The only reason people in spaceships float is because they are in perpetual free-fall. The Earth's gravitational pull at that distance isn't much different from that on the surface. Should this be listed somewhere on the page? Bwabes 16:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Would it make sense that we create an article about the factions in Gundam 00? The other Gundam factions page seems to suffer from a lot of problems, but should we create one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.217.81.176 ( talk) 07:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
A recent edit lists the song as being used as an insert song. I'm not sure I'd agree. The slow version is used in the final minutes of 2 episodes so far right before the actual ED. SEED and Destiny used to do similar, with either a slow build up playing over the final minutes or for more dramatic cliffhangers just leaping into the ED unannounced.-- HellCat86 ( talk) 14:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate your efforts, Fallacies, but is an enormous table like that really necessary? ^^; I mean, the who list is on the ANN page already and it is linked at the bottom of the page... -- Koveras ☭ 17:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I have altered the term "World Economy Union" to "Global Economic Union." This should be further editted if an official translation appears. It appears on the Japanese wiki as "Union of Solar Energy and Free Nations," which might or might not be officially sourced. It seems to be in the same spirit as "ZAFT." Also, a previous edit modified the fansub-based "Human Reform/Reformed League" to a more communistic-themed "People's Revolutionary Alliance." I believe this to be appropriate, because even though "reform league" is a literal translation, "People's Revolutionary" compares better with "World Socialist Revolution" (世界社会主義革命) and the Chinese "People's Liberation Army" (人民解放軍). -- Fallacies 05:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Joppyhoppy has reversed the modifications I previously submitted to the "Human Reform League's" name translation, on the justification of insufficient backing in canon for a communistic-themed name. Though I agree, I would note that the fansub-based "Human Reform/Reformed League/Alliance" has similarly little justification and is less sensitive to the usage in Japanese. The meaning of "Human Reform" is, if unrelated to communistic concepts, also unclear in English. Further information required from canon. -- Fallacies 10:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Since we already have a Nations and Factions page, is it ok to simply and link there instead of having a giant spew of information on the countries?
Fallacies (
talk) 04:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Please refer to this image before deciding to edit the member states of the 3 powers:
http://img196.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99080_1194386518964_122_380lo.jpg
Note that the map is approximate, and that certain unmarked locations are visibly marked in the actual episode 2, from which the image was derived.
Fallacies (
talk) 05:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
i was wondering what the 00 ment and how you might say it, for example is it just zero zero? or does it mean something else? picklefishman Dec. 2, 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 05:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
It also could be interpreted as the symbol of infinity. And you know, those two circles the Gundam 'drawned' in space during battles? Being able to quantitize? Sorta related to infinity —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.82.38.166 ( talk) 04:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I think this section should be changed. I've been buying Gundam Ace for the last year or so and really, it isn't telling the story of 00. Alot of the main cast appear in important roles and it is occuring close to the anime story but I wouldn't call it an adaptation. The only real 00 manga adaptation running is the one in Kero Kero Ace.-- HellCat86 ( talk) 17:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree some mention of the manga ( Gundam OOF , V and P) should at least be mentioned 69.86.55.108 ( talk) 21:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Just curious..is it acknowledged in the Gundam 00 series or is it set on a completely different setting? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.14.83.20 ( talk) 10:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok I know Wiki is not a forum but every time I read this page the technically it's all the same universe comment annoys me. Turn A definately suggests that all Gundams BEFORE SEED are united. But it was also made before SEED. So anything after Turn A is not included in its timeline relation. It's even shown that way in that image from the Turn A page from some video game or something.
Also 00 has vaguely turned into a remake of Zeta with sprinkles of the Cosmic Era and Wing. So technically you could say that it has its basis off previous Gundams like SEED And S Destiny did. 69.207.32.133 ( talk) 11:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Anyone in favor of a section rewrite (condensation into several paragraphs of information; removal of the numerous subsections) here? This section seems to be a little messy, with fragmented info here and there. In fact, the sentences make little to no sense to me at times. The Slimy One 16:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I´m generally miffed that everyone keeps adding fault japanese mispronounciation. Really: it´s just dumb in my opinion and serves no purpouse. Why do you keep doing this? I mean what point is there that a reader needs to know that "Soresutaru Biiingu" is the way the japanese mispronounce it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.188.192.20 ( talk) 23:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The japanese are using the katakana system to pronounce english words instead of really using english pronunciation. Therefore it is useful for those people who wanna know why and how japanese pronounce english words.--
58.26.136.5 (
talk) 19:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
When I was watching the anime series the characters call them Arrows, but in this refered to them as A-laws. What are they called, Arrows or A-laws? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.194.124 ( talk) 11:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
From the new OP single, Setuna's real name is Soran Ebrahim in the character card. ( 75.157.130.116 ( talk) 02:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC))
Either I'm not seeing it or its not there, but should there be something about the opening at the beginning of the episode that changes in about mid-season 2? What I'm saying is that in another anime, Gurren Laggan, there's like a seven year skip, so the opening changes. But during mid-season 2, there is no "skip". And also the new opening is really different from the other one. But then again this might be a different one or something because I'm watching the episodes (since season two isn't going to be on SciFi, at least not for a while) on different sites, mainly MegaVideo and others. Searching for an Answer or Opinion, W M 2 20:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
You don't watch many animes do you? Animes can change their opening for no reason just because they feel like it or they got bored with the old one. It doesn't neccessary have anything to do with a timeskip. -- 203.82.91.34 ( talk) 12:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
the picture showing the title of mobile suit gundam 00 is in Japanese, yet in the sci-fi channel they already showed the title in english. Dont you think we should change the picture in the main article? just saying. Haseo445 ( talk) 15:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
No, but you're missing the point though...this is the English Wikipedia, so why don't we get an English title? Mobile suit gundam 00 has been licensed for north America so why not put the English one though? . Haseo445 ( talk) 15:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
i know that it was available, but that doesn't mean thats only one we should use. it wouldnt be that hard to justify, and you know it. The Wikipedia itself is in english preference so its better to use the english title logo or the english DVD. its not that big of a deal, we can easily do that. its more suitable to use that one than the japanese one.
and as for wikipedia, i find it strane for someone to prefer a japanes title within english article. point is, english article should have english DVD covercase. i can understand some of these didnt come out of america giving obligatoin to not change it, but theres an english one out already and theres no trouble putting it here. Haseo445 ( talk) 15:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
how is it systemic bias? our Japanese sources get translated, so why don't we translate the Japanese cover by adding the English one?. also the manga of mobile suit 00 doesn't have an English version so there's no point trying to look for one, poor example there. I'm not saying keep both covers, i mean remove the Japanese one and put the English one. I mean what if someone tries to find this DVD but couldn't find it because he only remembered it as having Japanese characters and thought the English one was a different series? It has happened to many of my friends.
I know you can use a Japanese one, but since there's an English one, why not place it there?its a benefit not an burden. its nothing wrong. it doesn't encourage systemic bias. DO we honestly know if the japanese cover and english cover look the same anyways? they could look different than just the logo aswell which could be another reason why we should change it Haseo445 ( talk) 15:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
i was just to talk about the same thing....Is it so hard to change it back to the english one? i read systemic bias but half of it doesn't make sense to me. It would be helping more of the readers than the article itself if you placed an English cover. Because sometimes they differ and we wont be able to differentiate from them.
i could understand if there was no English version yet. Linder1990 ( talk) 16:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
you guys seem pretty hard edge for something that can easily be done and no one would complain about it. i get one image is plenty but didnt haseo445 said that you can remove the first cover and replace it with english one???
anyways if both covers look completely different then yes, i believe it would be nice to change it. i dont tihnk it was mean to search for buying it, i think it was recognizing it somewhere else instead of here. also the anime and manga articles are basically short information expecting you to buy them to get full detail so why not? not my problem, i was just wondering if you guys could change it, nothing bad about it. Japanese DVD case on English article sounds like a broken to me. Linder1990 ( talk) 00:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
well i know the movie and the book will come out in English and the comic is already out in English. Still i know its in japanese, but i dont know japanese and sometimes english covers differ from japanese. so when the time comes at least consider it. Linder1990 ( talk) 15:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
One of the links took me to the AnimeFart website. I noticed that there was an episode 13.5 between episode 13 and 14 (duh). It was in all Japanese so I didn't take the time to go through the whole video. Does anyone have some kind of explanation? Please & Thank You, W M 2 23:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Episode 13.5 is more like an interview episode. In this episode, the seiyus are interviewed and asked questions about the show itself or their experiences while doing the show. -- lpjz290 —Preceding undated comment added 08:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC).
a commercial in the last episode of season 2 shows the planet Jupiter and mention that they are developing a Gundam 00 movie in 2010. SilentmanX ( talk) 14:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I have merged the above article into this one, however, I would urge those with a knowledge and interest to clean it up, as my merger may well be a little on the cruder and sloppier side. Apologies for any unnecessary work I've created!! HJ Mitchell ( talk) 21:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I notice that currently the plot for season 2 states that the plan called for A-Laws force to unite humanity after Celestial Being's initial defeat. Unless an official source confirms that I think we should remove it. A-Laws being part of the plan is only ever stated by Ribbons and his followers, who are known to be rogue elements. When Tieria discusses the plan in episode 24, he only mentions that Celestial Being's interventions were meant to unite humanity against a common enemy. It would seem clear that A-Laws is Ribbons being impatient and using violence to stronghand his interepretation of the plan.-- HellCat86 ( talk) 21:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
the source (aeug.blogspot.com) says - first volume is 22,847 copies not 42,847 copies - third volume is 25,135 copies not 55,135 copies 401team ( talk) 07:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Just a general notice to not change any references to the Sci Fi channel prier to the July 7, 2009 rebranding. This is do to remain factually accurate as the channel was called the Sci Fi channel until July 7, 2009 when it was rebranded as Syfy. Any content related to the post-rebranding period should, naturally, use the new name. -- Farix ( Talk) 21:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
the movie description says that there are four lights surrounding Jupiter plus one in the very center but i don't see one and i don't see any reference to it either. So i'll edit it to say only for lights —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.176.77 ( talk) 15:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
nope, dont see it....we should just state the obvious, i saw three youtube videos showing nothing and i even have it recorded...i dont see no 5th one. i suggest we leave it to 4 until it's more easier to see. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Actaully i looked at the picture and it shows a little white spot on Jupiter but that inst a light from a gundam or anything.....Again, there are only four, it should be easier to see if you can see it, but i just think it's your mind playing tricks. there is no fifth light. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Simple solution: rephrase to Within a few seconds of the video shot, it showed Jupiter surrounded by multiple green lights and the phrase "The Childhood of Humankind Ends". That extra "plus another one at the center" clause is rather awkward anyways.-- Remurmur ( talk) 16:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
I am up for a sentence structure change "it showed Jupiter surrounded by four green lights plus another one at the center and the phrase " is very awkward and as far as I see it, it is poorly written. I say we change it to "it showed Jupiter surrounded by five green lights and the phrase" —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZgokE ( talk • contribs) 08:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
In the "Story and Settings - First Season" section, it says that the character Setsuna "...grew up in the war-torn Krugis Republic." However, later, in the characters section, Setsuna is said to have been "...a child soldier in the war-torn Kurdish Republic." As far as I can tell, the official term is "Krugis Republic". Is there any official source for the "Kurdish Republic" interpretation? When I listened to the Japanese dialog, I couldn't here it, but I don't claim to be an expert. Either way, shouldn't the terms be consistent? I'd make the edit, but that feels presumtious, being a new user and all. Rubyfulcrum ( talk) 05:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
This section is self-contradictory, as it neglects the fact that Gundam SEED is itself set in an alternate universe from the main Universal Century continuity.-- Rosicrucian Talk 01:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
I do not understand how it is self-contradictory. The article never suggests that it is part of the Cosmic Era, however it is written in a way for this interpretation to be made. However, the information from this source is actually from a blog. And this blog's sources have bad links. In addition, these are japanese ratings, and that definitely should be noted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZgokE ( talk • contribs) 08:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I changed the end of the opening sentence of the 2nd paragraph of the summary description of Gundam 00 on it's Wikipedia page by changing the show 's time line description from Anno Domini era to the Common Era. I also did this in the opening sentence of the second paragraph of the subheading "First season" of the heading "Story and settings" on the Wikipedia page of Gundam 00 by changing AD to CE. I provided links for each of the changes. I feel these changes would be welcomed as Anno Domini is a religious description of the era in which we are living, while Common Era is a secular description of it. These changes would leave those who aren't christian more at ease by not offending them through avoiding unnecessary use of anything religious. After all, this is a secular website. This is my first time editing Wikipedia, so please forgive my ignorance. I would like to change the page back to the way I had previously edited it, but a conservative christian fundamentalist edited my previous edit and probably will do so again in the future if I edit it again. I just don't want people to feel bombarded by religion.-- GrandMasterDr.Enigma Talk 21:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)\
One of the things that has bothered me for some time is if Mobile Suit Gundam 00 consists of two different series or is it one whole series consisting of two seasons. The reason for this question is that each Infobox animanga component is suppose to give an overview of an single series, including all seasons within that series.
Arguments for one series with two seasons:
Arguments for two series lasting for one season each:
Some of these are a bit superficial, but what are your thoughts? If it's one series with two seasons, then the two seasons need to be combined into a single infobox component. If it is two seasons with the same title, than we need to come up with a better way of handling the titles in the infobox components as it looks like "First Season" and "Second Season" are part of the official title. — Farix ( t | c) 04:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
@ 201.67.70.93 ( talk): What is your bases that it is two separate series given the evidence provided in the previous discussion above that it is one series with two seasons? — Farix ( t | c) 20:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
The "popularity" section includes anime & character poll in the April 2008 issue of Newtype. However, I don't think this poll is notable enough because Newtype is published monthly along with a poll each issue. Typically, any reasonably popular currently-airing anime will get voted in the Top 10s of the month. Aside from that, Newtype is just one magazine, its character popularity poll doesn't hold more weight than other anime magazines like Animedia or Animage.
I suggest removing the poll result, or adding a tabulation from other months & magazines (might be too tedious), or only including annual character popularity polls, such as Animage's Anime Grand Prix. Nofairytale ( talk) 07:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Season 2 part 1 ANN Season 2 part 1 Mania.com Mania.com Season 2 part 2 Mania.com Season 2 part 3 ANN Mobile Suit Gundam 00 the Movie: Awakening of the Trailblazer ANN Shelf Life season 2 part 1 & 2
--
KrebMarkt 18:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
About the popularity part, what is the point in comparing 00 to Seed and Destiny? shouldn't 00 be compared to other Anime from the same time period? (2007/2009) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.120.103.115 ( talk) 18:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The manga is being dropped by Bandai Entertainment; http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/feature/bandai_downsizing_ken_iyadomi_interview -- Gwern (contribs) 22:36 3 January 2012 (GMT)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mobile Suit Gundam 00. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Fanron comes from where? The press release and Newtype Japan only say Setsuna F. Seiei. :/ The same for "Middle East". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.49.151.44 ( talk • contribs)
Like this one? http://www.gundam00.net/ms/img/01.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.171.6.142 ( talk • contribs)
Okay, the first theme has been added to the Opening/Ending themes. Please, do not delete them -- rather if you have some info. It'd be much appreciated if you would add some themes as well. And also you're welcome to add insert themes when the show gets underway as well.-- Zeta26 08:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
The offical page has numbers 9.29, and I also read somwewhere the same date, so I was wondering which is the correct date for the premiere... 89.133.167.182 18:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Is this really needed? It seems like it's just being used so random fans can add their opinions. The Destiny article once had similar and it became a nightmare of bickering and criticism.-- HellCat86 22:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, this is just a pointless excuse to express subjective and unfavourable opinions about the show. Anime News Network does not represent the viewers reception of Gundam 00 singlehandly. Kaioshin Sama 08:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
IMPORTANT! I've found some impressive data on the 4 Gundams names, technical stats, and possible pictures of each; However, I can't seem to figure out how to cite sources on Wikipedia; can someone load these 4 Adresses as "sources"? They are consistant with the Normal format for Gundam data,and all list the same artist under "designer"(except for Exia), So I have reason to believe legitimacy. Exia: http://www.mahq.net/Mecha/gundam/00/gn-001.htm Dynames: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/00/gn-002.htm Kyrios: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/00/gn-003.htm Virtue: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/00/gn-005.htm
Agian, this is Important because I can't add the "gundams" section without sources being loaded; otherwise It'll be deleted shortly thereafter. Shotesu 21:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticied that in the first episode everyone who was in the orbital elevator was floating. The only reason people in spaceships float is because they are in perpetual free-fall. The Earth's gravitational pull at that distance isn't much different from that on the surface. Should this be listed somewhere on the page? Bwabes 16:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Would it make sense that we create an article about the factions in Gundam 00? The other Gundam factions page seems to suffer from a lot of problems, but should we create one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.217.81.176 ( talk) 07:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
A recent edit lists the song as being used as an insert song. I'm not sure I'd agree. The slow version is used in the final minutes of 2 episodes so far right before the actual ED. SEED and Destiny used to do similar, with either a slow build up playing over the final minutes or for more dramatic cliffhangers just leaping into the ED unannounced.-- HellCat86 ( talk) 14:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate your efforts, Fallacies, but is an enormous table like that really necessary? ^^; I mean, the who list is on the ANN page already and it is linked at the bottom of the page... -- Koveras ☭ 17:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I have altered the term "World Economy Union" to "Global Economic Union." This should be further editted if an official translation appears. It appears on the Japanese wiki as "Union of Solar Energy and Free Nations," which might or might not be officially sourced. It seems to be in the same spirit as "ZAFT." Also, a previous edit modified the fansub-based "Human Reform/Reformed League" to a more communistic-themed "People's Revolutionary Alliance." I believe this to be appropriate, because even though "reform league" is a literal translation, "People's Revolutionary" compares better with "World Socialist Revolution" (世界社会主義革命) and the Chinese "People's Liberation Army" (人民解放軍). -- Fallacies 05:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Joppyhoppy has reversed the modifications I previously submitted to the "Human Reform League's" name translation, on the justification of insufficient backing in canon for a communistic-themed name. Though I agree, I would note that the fansub-based "Human Reform/Reformed League/Alliance" has similarly little justification and is less sensitive to the usage in Japanese. The meaning of "Human Reform" is, if unrelated to communistic concepts, also unclear in English. Further information required from canon. -- Fallacies 10:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Since we already have a Nations and Factions page, is it ok to simply and link there instead of having a giant spew of information on the countries?
Fallacies (
talk) 04:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Please refer to this image before deciding to edit the member states of the 3 powers:
http://img196.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99080_1194386518964_122_380lo.jpg
Note that the map is approximate, and that certain unmarked locations are visibly marked in the actual episode 2, from which the image was derived.
Fallacies (
talk) 05:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
i was wondering what the 00 ment and how you might say it, for example is it just zero zero? or does it mean something else? picklefishman Dec. 2, 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 05:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
It also could be interpreted as the symbol of infinity. And you know, those two circles the Gundam 'drawned' in space during battles? Being able to quantitize? Sorta related to infinity —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.82.38.166 ( talk) 04:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I think this section should be changed. I've been buying Gundam Ace for the last year or so and really, it isn't telling the story of 00. Alot of the main cast appear in important roles and it is occuring close to the anime story but I wouldn't call it an adaptation. The only real 00 manga adaptation running is the one in Kero Kero Ace.-- HellCat86 ( talk) 17:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree some mention of the manga ( Gundam OOF , V and P) should at least be mentioned 69.86.55.108 ( talk) 21:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Just curious..is it acknowledged in the Gundam 00 series or is it set on a completely different setting? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.14.83.20 ( talk) 10:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok I know Wiki is not a forum but every time I read this page the technically it's all the same universe comment annoys me. Turn A definately suggests that all Gundams BEFORE SEED are united. But it was also made before SEED. So anything after Turn A is not included in its timeline relation. It's even shown that way in that image from the Turn A page from some video game or something.
Also 00 has vaguely turned into a remake of Zeta with sprinkles of the Cosmic Era and Wing. So technically you could say that it has its basis off previous Gundams like SEED And S Destiny did. 69.207.32.133 ( talk) 11:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Anyone in favor of a section rewrite (condensation into several paragraphs of information; removal of the numerous subsections) here? This section seems to be a little messy, with fragmented info here and there. In fact, the sentences make little to no sense to me at times. The Slimy One 16:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I´m generally miffed that everyone keeps adding fault japanese mispronounciation. Really: it´s just dumb in my opinion and serves no purpouse. Why do you keep doing this? I mean what point is there that a reader needs to know that "Soresutaru Biiingu" is the way the japanese mispronounce it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.188.192.20 ( talk) 23:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The japanese are using the katakana system to pronounce english words instead of really using english pronunciation. Therefore it is useful for those people who wanna know why and how japanese pronounce english words.--
58.26.136.5 (
talk) 19:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
When I was watching the anime series the characters call them Arrows, but in this refered to them as A-laws. What are they called, Arrows or A-laws? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.194.124 ( talk) 11:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
From the new OP single, Setuna's real name is Soran Ebrahim in the character card. ( 75.157.130.116 ( talk) 02:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC))
Either I'm not seeing it or its not there, but should there be something about the opening at the beginning of the episode that changes in about mid-season 2? What I'm saying is that in another anime, Gurren Laggan, there's like a seven year skip, so the opening changes. But during mid-season 2, there is no "skip". And also the new opening is really different from the other one. But then again this might be a different one or something because I'm watching the episodes (since season two isn't going to be on SciFi, at least not for a while) on different sites, mainly MegaVideo and others. Searching for an Answer or Opinion, W M 2 20:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
You don't watch many animes do you? Animes can change their opening for no reason just because they feel like it or they got bored with the old one. It doesn't neccessary have anything to do with a timeskip. -- 203.82.91.34 ( talk) 12:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
the picture showing the title of mobile suit gundam 00 is in Japanese, yet in the sci-fi channel they already showed the title in english. Dont you think we should change the picture in the main article? just saying. Haseo445 ( talk) 15:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
No, but you're missing the point though...this is the English Wikipedia, so why don't we get an English title? Mobile suit gundam 00 has been licensed for north America so why not put the English one though? . Haseo445 ( talk) 15:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
i know that it was available, but that doesn't mean thats only one we should use. it wouldnt be that hard to justify, and you know it. The Wikipedia itself is in english preference so its better to use the english title logo or the english DVD. its not that big of a deal, we can easily do that. its more suitable to use that one than the japanese one.
and as for wikipedia, i find it strane for someone to prefer a japanes title within english article. point is, english article should have english DVD covercase. i can understand some of these didnt come out of america giving obligatoin to not change it, but theres an english one out already and theres no trouble putting it here. Haseo445 ( talk) 15:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
how is it systemic bias? our Japanese sources get translated, so why don't we translate the Japanese cover by adding the English one?. also the manga of mobile suit 00 doesn't have an English version so there's no point trying to look for one, poor example there. I'm not saying keep both covers, i mean remove the Japanese one and put the English one. I mean what if someone tries to find this DVD but couldn't find it because he only remembered it as having Japanese characters and thought the English one was a different series? It has happened to many of my friends.
I know you can use a Japanese one, but since there's an English one, why not place it there?its a benefit not an burden. its nothing wrong. it doesn't encourage systemic bias. DO we honestly know if the japanese cover and english cover look the same anyways? they could look different than just the logo aswell which could be another reason why we should change it Haseo445 ( talk) 15:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
i was just to talk about the same thing....Is it so hard to change it back to the english one? i read systemic bias but half of it doesn't make sense to me. It would be helping more of the readers than the article itself if you placed an English cover. Because sometimes they differ and we wont be able to differentiate from them.
i could understand if there was no English version yet. Linder1990 ( talk) 16:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
you guys seem pretty hard edge for something that can easily be done and no one would complain about it. i get one image is plenty but didnt haseo445 said that you can remove the first cover and replace it with english one???
anyways if both covers look completely different then yes, i believe it would be nice to change it. i dont tihnk it was mean to search for buying it, i think it was recognizing it somewhere else instead of here. also the anime and manga articles are basically short information expecting you to buy them to get full detail so why not? not my problem, i was just wondering if you guys could change it, nothing bad about it. Japanese DVD case on English article sounds like a broken to me. Linder1990 ( talk) 00:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
well i know the movie and the book will come out in English and the comic is already out in English. Still i know its in japanese, but i dont know japanese and sometimes english covers differ from japanese. so when the time comes at least consider it. Linder1990 ( talk) 15:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
One of the links took me to the AnimeFart website. I noticed that there was an episode 13.5 between episode 13 and 14 (duh). It was in all Japanese so I didn't take the time to go through the whole video. Does anyone have some kind of explanation? Please & Thank You, W M 2 23:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Episode 13.5 is more like an interview episode. In this episode, the seiyus are interviewed and asked questions about the show itself or their experiences while doing the show. -- lpjz290 —Preceding undated comment added 08:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC).
a commercial in the last episode of season 2 shows the planet Jupiter and mention that they are developing a Gundam 00 movie in 2010. SilentmanX ( talk) 14:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I have merged the above article into this one, however, I would urge those with a knowledge and interest to clean it up, as my merger may well be a little on the cruder and sloppier side. Apologies for any unnecessary work I've created!! HJ Mitchell ( talk) 21:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I notice that currently the plot for season 2 states that the plan called for A-Laws force to unite humanity after Celestial Being's initial defeat. Unless an official source confirms that I think we should remove it. A-Laws being part of the plan is only ever stated by Ribbons and his followers, who are known to be rogue elements. When Tieria discusses the plan in episode 24, he only mentions that Celestial Being's interventions were meant to unite humanity against a common enemy. It would seem clear that A-Laws is Ribbons being impatient and using violence to stronghand his interepretation of the plan.-- HellCat86 ( talk) 21:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
the source (aeug.blogspot.com) says - first volume is 22,847 copies not 42,847 copies - third volume is 25,135 copies not 55,135 copies 401team ( talk) 07:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Just a general notice to not change any references to the Sci Fi channel prier to the July 7, 2009 rebranding. This is do to remain factually accurate as the channel was called the Sci Fi channel until July 7, 2009 when it was rebranded as Syfy. Any content related to the post-rebranding period should, naturally, use the new name. -- Farix ( Talk) 21:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
the movie description says that there are four lights surrounding Jupiter plus one in the very center but i don't see one and i don't see any reference to it either. So i'll edit it to say only for lights —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.176.77 ( talk) 15:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
nope, dont see it....we should just state the obvious, i saw three youtube videos showing nothing and i even have it recorded...i dont see no 5th one. i suggest we leave it to 4 until it's more easier to see. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Actaully i looked at the picture and it shows a little white spot on Jupiter but that inst a light from a gundam or anything.....Again, there are only four, it should be easier to see if you can see it, but i just think it's your mind playing tricks. there is no fifth light. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Simple solution: rephrase to Within a few seconds of the video shot, it showed Jupiter surrounded by multiple green lights and the phrase "The Childhood of Humankind Ends". That extra "plus another one at the center" clause is rather awkward anyways.-- Remurmur ( talk) 16:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
I am up for a sentence structure change "it showed Jupiter surrounded by four green lights plus another one at the center and the phrase " is very awkward and as far as I see it, it is poorly written. I say we change it to "it showed Jupiter surrounded by five green lights and the phrase" —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZgokE ( talk • contribs) 08:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
In the "Story and Settings - First Season" section, it says that the character Setsuna "...grew up in the war-torn Krugis Republic." However, later, in the characters section, Setsuna is said to have been "...a child soldier in the war-torn Kurdish Republic." As far as I can tell, the official term is "Krugis Republic". Is there any official source for the "Kurdish Republic" interpretation? When I listened to the Japanese dialog, I couldn't here it, but I don't claim to be an expert. Either way, shouldn't the terms be consistent? I'd make the edit, but that feels presumtious, being a new user and all. Rubyfulcrum ( talk) 05:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
This section is self-contradictory, as it neglects the fact that Gundam SEED is itself set in an alternate universe from the main Universal Century continuity.-- Rosicrucian Talk 01:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
I do not understand how it is self-contradictory. The article never suggests that it is part of the Cosmic Era, however it is written in a way for this interpretation to be made. However, the information from this source is actually from a blog. And this blog's sources have bad links. In addition, these are japanese ratings, and that definitely should be noted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZgokE ( talk • contribs) 08:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I changed the end of the opening sentence of the 2nd paragraph of the summary description of Gundam 00 on it's Wikipedia page by changing the show 's time line description from Anno Domini era to the Common Era. I also did this in the opening sentence of the second paragraph of the subheading "First season" of the heading "Story and settings" on the Wikipedia page of Gundam 00 by changing AD to CE. I provided links for each of the changes. I feel these changes would be welcomed as Anno Domini is a religious description of the era in which we are living, while Common Era is a secular description of it. These changes would leave those who aren't christian more at ease by not offending them through avoiding unnecessary use of anything religious. After all, this is a secular website. This is my first time editing Wikipedia, so please forgive my ignorance. I would like to change the page back to the way I had previously edited it, but a conservative christian fundamentalist edited my previous edit and probably will do so again in the future if I edit it again. I just don't want people to feel bombarded by religion.-- GrandMasterDr.Enigma Talk 21:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)\
One of the things that has bothered me for some time is if Mobile Suit Gundam 00 consists of two different series or is it one whole series consisting of two seasons. The reason for this question is that each Infobox animanga component is suppose to give an overview of an single series, including all seasons within that series.
Arguments for one series with two seasons:
Arguments for two series lasting for one season each:
Some of these are a bit superficial, but what are your thoughts? If it's one series with two seasons, then the two seasons need to be combined into a single infobox component. If it is two seasons with the same title, than we need to come up with a better way of handling the titles in the infobox components as it looks like "First Season" and "Second Season" are part of the official title. — Farix ( t | c) 04:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
@ 201.67.70.93 ( talk): What is your bases that it is two separate series given the evidence provided in the previous discussion above that it is one series with two seasons? — Farix ( t | c) 20:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
The "popularity" section includes anime & character poll in the April 2008 issue of Newtype. However, I don't think this poll is notable enough because Newtype is published monthly along with a poll each issue. Typically, any reasonably popular currently-airing anime will get voted in the Top 10s of the month. Aside from that, Newtype is just one magazine, its character popularity poll doesn't hold more weight than other anime magazines like Animedia or Animage.
I suggest removing the poll result, or adding a tabulation from other months & magazines (might be too tedious), or only including annual character popularity polls, such as Animage's Anime Grand Prix. Nofairytale ( talk) 07:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Season 2 part 1 ANN Season 2 part 1 Mania.com Mania.com Season 2 part 2 Mania.com Season 2 part 3 ANN Mobile Suit Gundam 00 the Movie: Awakening of the Trailblazer ANN Shelf Life season 2 part 1 & 2
--
KrebMarkt 18:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
About the popularity part, what is the point in comparing 00 to Seed and Destiny? shouldn't 00 be compared to other Anime from the same time period? (2007/2009) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.120.103.115 ( talk) 18:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The manga is being dropped by Bandai Entertainment; http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/feature/bandai_downsizing_ken_iyadomi_interview -- Gwern (contribs) 22:36 3 January 2012 (GMT)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mobile Suit Gundam 00. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)