This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mitsubishi F-X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference 74 points to a 404 error and needs to be removed. Also there is no reference for the claim “ the decision to joint-develop the aircraft with the US was later chosen due to a combination of US political pressure and the heavy undertaking of producing a fighter domestically.” and appears to be an unfounded claim on “political pressure” and should be removed. I did not edit as others are working on this pace as recently as just last month and would like to leave it to them to correct. CAG0001 ( talk) 09:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
https://www.ft.com/content/a024eeec-1b08-11ea-97df-cc63de1d73f4
It is unclear what is referred to by the term "Power" systems. This sentence in the article is translated from a source in Japanese (which I don't speak). It is plausible that a word translated into English as "Power" might refer to:
It is also unclear what part of such system(s) (e.g. engines, generators, APU) etc might have an electric actuator).
Could someone who speaks Japanese please have a read of the source below and clarify what "Power" systems refers to? https://web.archive.org/web/20190414090031/https://www.mod.go.jp/atla/research/gaibuhyouka/pdf/Elec_Actuator_29.pdf
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mitsubishi F-X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference 74 points to a 404 error and needs to be removed. Also there is no reference for the claim “ the decision to joint-develop the aircraft with the US was later chosen due to a combination of US political pressure and the heavy undertaking of producing a fighter domestically.” and appears to be an unfounded claim on “political pressure” and should be removed. I did not edit as others are working on this pace as recently as just last month and would like to leave it to them to correct. CAG0001 ( talk) 09:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
https://www.ft.com/content/a024eeec-1b08-11ea-97df-cc63de1d73f4
It is unclear what is referred to by the term "Power" systems. This sentence in the article is translated from a source in Japanese (which I don't speak). It is plausible that a word translated into English as "Power" might refer to:
It is also unclear what part of such system(s) (e.g. engines, generators, APU) etc might have an electric actuator).
Could someone who speaks Japanese please have a read of the source below and clarify what "Power" systems refers to? https://web.archive.org/web/20190414090031/https://www.mod.go.jp/atla/research/gaibuhyouka/pdf/Elec_Actuator_29.pdf