This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mikhail Blagosklonny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mikhail Blagosklonny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:40.134.67.50_reported_by_User:EEng_(Result:_) E Eng 22:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Can you Zaereth and Nomoskedasticity please take a look at this issue compared to wikipedia policy - I have prepared a thorough analysis:
GENERAL POLICY OVERVIEW
Wikipedia requires the use of high-quality sources for all citations to Biographies of Living Persons (BLP).
Sources must comply with US law, Wikipedia’s policy on BLPs, and Wikipedia’s content policies—neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research. The burden of proof is on editors who wish to retain disputed material.
APPLICATION OF POLICY TO FACTS in analysis of Beall’s List as a source on the BLP Page: Beall’s List is not a reliable source for a BLP for multiple reasons.
*Citations on this BLP page pecifically refers to a blog post from an anonymous source
Even among Wikipedia’s own editors, the inclusion of Beall’s List is contentious.
In general
MakinaterJones ( talk) 05:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
-- loupgarous ( talk) 10:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)"A representative of Roswell Park Cancer Institute, where Blagosklonny was based, told us he hasn’t held a full-time position there for more than one year. She did not provide any details of his departure".
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mikhail Blagosklonny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mikhail Blagosklonny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:40.134.67.50_reported_by_User:EEng_(Result:_) E Eng 22:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Can you Zaereth and Nomoskedasticity please take a look at this issue compared to wikipedia policy - I have prepared a thorough analysis:
GENERAL POLICY OVERVIEW
Wikipedia requires the use of high-quality sources for all citations to Biographies of Living Persons (BLP).
Sources must comply with US law, Wikipedia’s policy on BLPs, and Wikipedia’s content policies—neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research. The burden of proof is on editors who wish to retain disputed material.
APPLICATION OF POLICY TO FACTS in analysis of Beall’s List as a source on the BLP Page: Beall’s List is not a reliable source for a BLP for multiple reasons.
*Citations on this BLP page pecifically refers to a blog post from an anonymous source
Even among Wikipedia’s own editors, the inclusion of Beall’s List is contentious.
In general
MakinaterJones ( talk) 05:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
-- loupgarous ( talk) 10:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)"A representative of Roswell Park Cancer Institute, where Blagosklonny was based, told us he hasn’t held a full-time position there for more than one year. She did not provide any details of his departure".