![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Need molecular diagram. Badagnani ( talk) 16:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC) sdfghyujikolp;['# — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.126.38 ( talk) 20:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Was this compound historically known as "oxymuriate of mercury"? That name appears in quite a few nineteenth-century medical texts, and I was wondering if it refers to HgCl2 or another compound. The "oxy" might suggest otherwise, but HgClO doesn't appear to be a medically-significant compound (we don't have an article on it). Tevildo ( talk) 18:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
It looks like no-one has responded to your question since it was posted, so please allow me to do so. The answer is yes, it was known as the oxymuriate. I thoroughly recommend browsing really old chemistry textbooks :). RaynesParkGuy ( talk) 13:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
http://heritagesciencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40494-015-0068-8
©Geni ( talk) 22:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mercury(II) chloride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mercury(II) chloride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
"Mercuric chloride is obtained by the action of chlorine on mercury or mercury(I) chloride, __OR__ by the addition of hydrochloric acid to a hot, concentrated solution of mercury(I) compounds such as the nitrate:[2]"
In the section on Production, should the conjunction "or" be placed in the sentence, where I have placed "__OR__" above? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.75.12.145 ( talk) 01:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
🜑 and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🜑 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
🜒 and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🜒 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Dorsetonian: what do you mean with your edit summary here ("WP:NPOV")? Did you read the sources I cited? Let met quote you from Ferrario 2009, pp. 42:
Ferrario is the foremost expert on the De aluminibus et salibus today (cf. Moureau 2020 p. 107 "Gabriele Ferrario is currently preparing a new critical edition of the Arabic fragments and of the Hebrew translation of the text"). The statement by Moureau I summarized also confirms that this is the current view among scholars. Moureau 2020, p. 117:
It may help to know that the great, great majority of alchemical texts are pseudepigrapha, this is nothing unusual. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 14:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
[the] text is anonymous in most manuscripts, though ... a few attribute it to Abu Bakr al-Razito
[the] text is anonymous in most manuscripts, though ... a few falsely attribute it to Abu Bakr al-Razi.(footnote)On the false attribution to al-Razi, see (document) and the sources cited there. Moureau 2020, p. 117 stresses that the only Latin work which in the current state of research is known to be a translation of an authentic Arabic work by al-Razi is the Liber secretorum Bubacaris, an interpolated paraphrase...
adding that the text is "Falsely" attributed to Hermes doesn't change the overall context or meaning of the sentence. If you disagree then we should take it to board and ask for third opinion Hu741f4 ( talk) 17:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Need molecular diagram. Badagnani ( talk) 16:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC) sdfghyujikolp;['# — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.126.38 ( talk) 20:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Was this compound historically known as "oxymuriate of mercury"? That name appears in quite a few nineteenth-century medical texts, and I was wondering if it refers to HgCl2 or another compound. The "oxy" might suggest otherwise, but HgClO doesn't appear to be a medically-significant compound (we don't have an article on it). Tevildo ( talk) 18:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
It looks like no-one has responded to your question since it was posted, so please allow me to do so. The answer is yes, it was known as the oxymuriate. I thoroughly recommend browsing really old chemistry textbooks :). RaynesParkGuy ( talk) 13:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
http://heritagesciencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40494-015-0068-8
©Geni ( talk) 22:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mercury(II) chloride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mercury(II) chloride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
"Mercuric chloride is obtained by the action of chlorine on mercury or mercury(I) chloride, __OR__ by the addition of hydrochloric acid to a hot, concentrated solution of mercury(I) compounds such as the nitrate:[2]"
In the section on Production, should the conjunction "or" be placed in the sentence, where I have placed "__OR__" above? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.75.12.145 ( talk) 01:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
🜑 and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🜑 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
🜒 and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🜒 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Dorsetonian: what do you mean with your edit summary here ("WP:NPOV")? Did you read the sources I cited? Let met quote you from Ferrario 2009, pp. 42:
Ferrario is the foremost expert on the De aluminibus et salibus today (cf. Moureau 2020 p. 107 "Gabriele Ferrario is currently preparing a new critical edition of the Arabic fragments and of the Hebrew translation of the text"). The statement by Moureau I summarized also confirms that this is the current view among scholars. Moureau 2020, p. 117:
It may help to know that the great, great majority of alchemical texts are pseudepigrapha, this is nothing unusual. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 14:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
[the] text is anonymous in most manuscripts, though ... a few attribute it to Abu Bakr al-Razito
[the] text is anonymous in most manuscripts, though ... a few falsely attribute it to Abu Bakr al-Razi.(footnote)On the false attribution to al-Razi, see (document) and the sources cited there. Moureau 2020, p. 117 stresses that the only Latin work which in the current state of research is known to be a translation of an authentic Arabic work by al-Razi is the Liber secretorum Bubacaris, an interpolated paraphrase...
adding that the text is "Falsely" attributed to Hermes doesn't change the overall context or meaning of the sentence. If you disagree then we should take it to board and ask for third opinion Hu741f4 ( talk) 17:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)