![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 15 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Oliviajones14.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I would like to add to this article in the coming weeks. I will be primarily updating the 20-21st century section under history and distribution. I am doing this because this article has content gaps when it comes to matriarchies that still exist today. It briefly mentions the Umoja community, but it does not mention any other matriarchies that exist today. I plan on then revising other parts of the history section to include more contextualization and background information. Feel free to look at the annotated bibliography in my sandbox to see what sources I will be referencing. Oliviajones14 ( talk) 03:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will make sure to explain that some scholars do not consider true matriarchies to have ever existed in the content I add. Furthermore, these differing definitions of matriarchy are explained in detail in the "Definitions, Connotations, and Etymology" section, along with an explanation as to why some consider matriarchies to exist and others not. Also clarified in this section is why many experts don't consider matriarchy to be a term parallel to patriarchy. Oliviajones14 ( talk) 17:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The spelling of "Mosuo" as "Mosou" was a typo I have now corrected. Thank you for catching that. The source you mentioned should be cited as it explains how daughters are heirs, but I added the other source published in 2016 from the following sentence that dates this practice. I have corrected it so that both are cited following that sentence. Thank you for clarifying that I have correctly sourced my additions. Oliviajones14 ( talk) 19:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Female-Led Relationship redirects here, but there is no mention of the contemporary phrase. Thoughts on adding something? And, if so, what reliable sources to use? Thanks. --Surv1v4l1st + Talk| Contribs+ 01:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I recently had two of my edits to this article deleted claiming they were "citespam", and yet it did not fit the definition of that per WP:SPAM. The additions were 100% relevant to the topic and simply added citations and information about additional advocates. Ajax151 ( talk) 01:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
My comments are in response to the following portion of the current (12/20/22) version of this article (between the asterisks):
* * * * *
"The word matriarchy, for a society politically led by females, especially mothers, who also control property, is often interpreted to mean the genderal opposite of patriarchy, but it is not an opposite.[9][10][11] According to Peoples and Bailey, the view of anthropologist Peggy Reeves Sanday is that matriarchies are not a mirror form of patriarchies but rather that a matriarchy "emphasizes maternal meanings where 'maternal symbols are linked to social practices influencing the lives of both sexes and where women play a central role in these practices'."
- * * * *
This is patent B.S. If patriarchy is defined as "rule by men" (and it certainly is) then matriarchy must be defined as."rule by women". Because there is no hard evidence of societies ruled by women, now or in the past, feminist ideologues (female and male) pull the ham-handed switcheroo of mis-defining matriarchy as male-female egalitarian rule. Again, B.S. The intellectual dishonesty of this maneuver is breathtaking. 2600:1011:B010:DAEF:DC3E:99DF:C822:52B4 ( talk) 11:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I was wondering if there are user that still engage in page talk as latest response in this topic is old. Terminology or words used in this context, I cite precisely the word "domination" which is at the same time, strange and from a user who is explicitly interested about "fabulous" articles, I must say "domination" in this context made me laugh...
The root of the arisen said "dominating" woman, might use a non-traditional definition here since "domination" is not commonly known as. On the contrary or using similar approach, we can still keep the story but apply a different meaning such as "leading" or "managing finance", "household", or anything in particular could be related. The stance or true meaning of "domination" is far from reaching a correlation here with this publication. Domination, mean to dominate someone without any common or cognitive ability to succeed or to deliberately, and with authority, execute a function that would also restrict someone mentally or physically. However, a more convivial locution should be applied. SirlupinwatsonIII ( talk) 02:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 15 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Oliviajones14.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I would like to add to this article in the coming weeks. I will be primarily updating the 20-21st century section under history and distribution. I am doing this because this article has content gaps when it comes to matriarchies that still exist today. It briefly mentions the Umoja community, but it does not mention any other matriarchies that exist today. I plan on then revising other parts of the history section to include more contextualization and background information. Feel free to look at the annotated bibliography in my sandbox to see what sources I will be referencing. Oliviajones14 ( talk) 03:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will make sure to explain that some scholars do not consider true matriarchies to have ever existed in the content I add. Furthermore, these differing definitions of matriarchy are explained in detail in the "Definitions, Connotations, and Etymology" section, along with an explanation as to why some consider matriarchies to exist and others not. Also clarified in this section is why many experts don't consider matriarchy to be a term parallel to patriarchy. Oliviajones14 ( talk) 17:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The spelling of "Mosuo" as "Mosou" was a typo I have now corrected. Thank you for catching that. The source you mentioned should be cited as it explains how daughters are heirs, but I added the other source published in 2016 from the following sentence that dates this practice. I have corrected it so that both are cited following that sentence. Thank you for clarifying that I have correctly sourced my additions. Oliviajones14 ( talk) 19:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Female-Led Relationship redirects here, but there is no mention of the contemporary phrase. Thoughts on adding something? And, if so, what reliable sources to use? Thanks. --Surv1v4l1st + Talk| Contribs+ 01:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I recently had two of my edits to this article deleted claiming they were "citespam", and yet it did not fit the definition of that per WP:SPAM. The additions were 100% relevant to the topic and simply added citations and information about additional advocates. Ajax151 ( talk) 01:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
My comments are in response to the following portion of the current (12/20/22) version of this article (between the asterisks):
* * * * *
"The word matriarchy, for a society politically led by females, especially mothers, who also control property, is often interpreted to mean the genderal opposite of patriarchy, but it is not an opposite.[9][10][11] According to Peoples and Bailey, the view of anthropologist Peggy Reeves Sanday is that matriarchies are not a mirror form of patriarchies but rather that a matriarchy "emphasizes maternal meanings where 'maternal symbols are linked to social practices influencing the lives of both sexes and where women play a central role in these practices'."
- * * * *
This is patent B.S. If patriarchy is defined as "rule by men" (and it certainly is) then matriarchy must be defined as."rule by women". Because there is no hard evidence of societies ruled by women, now or in the past, feminist ideologues (female and male) pull the ham-handed switcheroo of mis-defining matriarchy as male-female egalitarian rule. Again, B.S. The intellectual dishonesty of this maneuver is breathtaking. 2600:1011:B010:DAEF:DC3E:99DF:C822:52B4 ( talk) 11:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I was wondering if there are user that still engage in page talk as latest response in this topic is old. Terminology or words used in this context, I cite precisely the word "domination" which is at the same time, strange and from a user who is explicitly interested about "fabulous" articles, I must say "domination" in this context made me laugh...
The root of the arisen said "dominating" woman, might use a non-traditional definition here since "domination" is not commonly known as. On the contrary or using similar approach, we can still keep the story but apply a different meaning such as "leading" or "managing finance", "household", or anything in particular could be related. The stance or true meaning of "domination" is far from reaching a correlation here with this publication. Domination, mean to dominate someone without any common or cognitive ability to succeed or to deliberately, and with authority, execute a function that would also restrict someone mentally or physically. However, a more convivial locution should be applied. SirlupinwatsonIII ( talk) 02:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)