![]() | Maternal sensitivity was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 18, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that children of
maternally sensitive mothers scored higher in math and phoneme knowledge than those who had a history of lower maternal sensitivity? |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk)
16:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Carina1205 ( talk), R-Bot6 ( talk), 1StrangerSC ( talk). Nominated by Carina1205 ( talk) at 19:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
--
Hook still not properly formatted. Article still not fully supported by sources. The unpublished dissertation is not an acceptable source in a medical article. There are a number of raw URLs in the citation list that need to go. There is at least one source that appears to be a primary source medical study where the section pretty much exclusively talks about it, not how others responded to it. No PMID in the citation. Appears to be other possible WP:MEDRS sourcing issues. This is not ready. When ALL these concerns are addressed, please comment HERE AND on my talk page. -- LauraHale ( talk) 20:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: WhatamIdoing ( talk · contribs) 21:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
This is generally well done, but there are a few problems.
A few specific problems:
As always, I'd be happy to hear your perspective, especially if you think I'm wrong. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 21:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
THANK YOU for your feedback. I have made some changes. I have to look into the reference, it seems that the information on that website comes form an actual journal from a university, but I will do my best to find a more appropriate reference for that information. Sorry for the late reply, it is exam time right about now, so I am not on Wikipedia much. All of our changes will be made by the 10th. Thank you for your patience and help. Carina1205 ( talk) 01:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Quick comment: all three semicolons in the article text are incorrect. You should use a plain colon (punctuation) to introduce lists. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 23:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I've been reading through for prose issues, and I fixed a few things that don't "count" for GA and that you really couldn't be expected to know anyway. I'm only about halfway through, but here's my current list for you, most of which are small issues:
The major issue is still the inadequate summary in the lead. Think of the lead as your elevator speech to high school students: you want to cover the high points in non-technical language, with the hope that they'll want to learn more. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
This isn't really related to the GA review, but the English Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an article for negative discipline. I'd been hoping for a page that differentiated it from negative punishment and negative reinforcement. Am I right to assume that negative discipline is related to positive discipline, i.e., the idea that discipline ought to be reasonably pleasant instruction and gentle correction rather than bad behavior (screaming/hitting/insulting)? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Any chance of broadening the scope to include fathers? General Vicinity ( talk) 08:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Maternal sensitivity was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 18, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that children of
maternally sensitive mothers scored higher in math and phoneme knowledge than those who had a history of lower maternal sensitivity? |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk)
16:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Carina1205 ( talk), R-Bot6 ( talk), 1StrangerSC ( talk). Nominated by Carina1205 ( talk) at 19:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
--
Hook still not properly formatted. Article still not fully supported by sources. The unpublished dissertation is not an acceptable source in a medical article. There are a number of raw URLs in the citation list that need to go. There is at least one source that appears to be a primary source medical study where the section pretty much exclusively talks about it, not how others responded to it. No PMID in the citation. Appears to be other possible WP:MEDRS sourcing issues. This is not ready. When ALL these concerns are addressed, please comment HERE AND on my talk page. -- LauraHale ( talk) 20:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: WhatamIdoing ( talk · contribs) 21:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
This is generally well done, but there are a few problems.
A few specific problems:
As always, I'd be happy to hear your perspective, especially if you think I'm wrong. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 21:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
THANK YOU for your feedback. I have made some changes. I have to look into the reference, it seems that the information on that website comes form an actual journal from a university, but I will do my best to find a more appropriate reference for that information. Sorry for the late reply, it is exam time right about now, so I am not on Wikipedia much. All of our changes will be made by the 10th. Thank you for your patience and help. Carina1205 ( talk) 01:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Quick comment: all three semicolons in the article text are incorrect. You should use a plain colon (punctuation) to introduce lists. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 23:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I've been reading through for prose issues, and I fixed a few things that don't "count" for GA and that you really couldn't be expected to know anyway. I'm only about halfway through, but here's my current list for you, most of which are small issues:
The major issue is still the inadequate summary in the lead. Think of the lead as your elevator speech to high school students: you want to cover the high points in non-technical language, with the hope that they'll want to learn more. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
This isn't really related to the GA review, but the English Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an article for negative discipline. I'd been hoping for a page that differentiated it from negative punishment and negative reinforcement. Am I right to assume that negative discipline is related to positive discipline, i.e., the idea that discipline ought to be reasonably pleasant instruction and gentle correction rather than bad behavior (screaming/hitting/insulting)? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Any chance of broadening the scope to include fathers? General Vicinity ( talk) 08:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)