From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleMartin Luther was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2006 Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 18, 2006 Good article nomineeListed
October 31, 2006 Peer reviewReviewed
May 12, 2007 Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 4, 2007 Good article nomineeNot listed
May 24, 2011 Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2012 Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 25, 2004, May 25, 2005, May 25, 2006, May 25, 2007, May 25, 2008, October 31, 2008, May 25, 2009, October 31, 2009, October 31, 2010, October 31, 2011, October 31, 2012, October 31, 2014, October 31, 2018, October 31, 2019, and October 31, 2021.
Current status: Delisted good article

In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words "We are at fault in not slaying them" amounted to a sanction for murder

What a laughable comment. In Robert Michael's view? In every sane literate person's view. GMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 ( talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi Protected Edit Request Sep. 11 2023

the beginning of the article says "despite the fact that Luther did not advocate the murdering of Jews", however, later in the article, it goes on to say "In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words 'We are at fault in not slaying them' amounted to a sanction for murder. 'God's anger with them is so intense,' Luther concluded, 'that gentle mercy will only tend to make them worse, while sharp mercy will reform them but little. Therefore, in any case, away with them!'." is this not advocating for murder in at least some sense? in any case, the addition of "did not *directly* advocate the murdering of Jews" would clear this up. Buzgie ( talk) 21:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC) reply

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{ Edit semi-protected}} template. This doesn't feel like the type of non-controversial change that should be made via an edit request without discussion first. PianoDan ( talk) 18:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC) reply

AGREE — Luther's words unambiguously advocated murdering Jews.
Peter Brown ( talk) 21:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply
AGREE
Luther unambiguously advocating the killing of Jews. This is not a matter of dispute within scholarship, and Luther's very works that are sourced within this article confirm this.
This article demonstrates with sources already that Lutheran unambiguously advocating the killing of Jews. This is not a matter of dispute within scholarship, and Luther's very works that are sourced within this article confirm this. Ysys9 ( talk) 11:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply
This is an unambiguous call for murdering Jews. It is tendentious nonsense - or illiteracy - to say otherwise. The beginning of the article is utter nonsense in disputing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 ( talk) 15:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2024

Under section "Diet of Worms (1521)" appears the text "On 18 April 1521, Luther appeared as ordered before the Diet of Worms." The date should be changed to 17 April 1521, as noted in the linked Wikipedia page for the Diet of Worms and in the following article in the World History Encyclopedia: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1900/luthers-speech-at-the-diet-of-worms/ (the link should also be added as a reference for that line). MikeStickles ( talk) 00:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done Awhellnawr123214 ( talk) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2024

Changes to be made in the style of the source code:

Change "==University of Wittenberg==" into "===University of Wittenberg==="

Add "==Ministry and Later Years==" to the line before the one referenced in the previous suggestion. Reformat if needed. RetroOortus ( talk) 19:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clarification:
Change heading "University of Wittenberg" to a subheading and in its place, put "Ministry and Later Years" RetroOortus ( talk) 19:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleMartin Luther was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2006 Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 18, 2006 Good article nomineeListed
October 31, 2006 Peer reviewReviewed
May 12, 2007 Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 4, 2007 Good article nomineeNot listed
May 24, 2011 Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2012 Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 25, 2004, May 25, 2005, May 25, 2006, May 25, 2007, May 25, 2008, October 31, 2008, May 25, 2009, October 31, 2009, October 31, 2010, October 31, 2011, October 31, 2012, October 31, 2014, October 31, 2018, October 31, 2019, and October 31, 2021.
Current status: Delisted good article

In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words "We are at fault in not slaying them" amounted to a sanction for murder

What a laughable comment. In Robert Michael's view? In every sane literate person's view. GMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 ( talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi Protected Edit Request Sep. 11 2023

the beginning of the article says "despite the fact that Luther did not advocate the murdering of Jews", however, later in the article, it goes on to say "In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words 'We are at fault in not slaying them' amounted to a sanction for murder. 'God's anger with them is so intense,' Luther concluded, 'that gentle mercy will only tend to make them worse, while sharp mercy will reform them but little. Therefore, in any case, away with them!'." is this not advocating for murder in at least some sense? in any case, the addition of "did not *directly* advocate the murdering of Jews" would clear this up. Buzgie ( talk) 21:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC) reply

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{ Edit semi-protected}} template. This doesn't feel like the type of non-controversial change that should be made via an edit request without discussion first. PianoDan ( talk) 18:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC) reply

AGREE — Luther's words unambiguously advocated murdering Jews.
Peter Brown ( talk) 21:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply
AGREE
Luther unambiguously advocating the killing of Jews. This is not a matter of dispute within scholarship, and Luther's very works that are sourced within this article confirm this.
This article demonstrates with sources already that Lutheran unambiguously advocating the killing of Jews. This is not a matter of dispute within scholarship, and Luther's very works that are sourced within this article confirm this. Ysys9 ( talk) 11:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply
This is an unambiguous call for murdering Jews. It is tendentious nonsense - or illiteracy - to say otherwise. The beginning of the article is utter nonsense in disputing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 ( talk) 15:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2024

Under section "Diet of Worms (1521)" appears the text "On 18 April 1521, Luther appeared as ordered before the Diet of Worms." The date should be changed to 17 April 1521, as noted in the linked Wikipedia page for the Diet of Worms and in the following article in the World History Encyclopedia: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1900/luthers-speech-at-the-diet-of-worms/ (the link should also be added as a reference for that line). MikeStickles ( talk) 00:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done Awhellnawr123214 ( talk) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2024

Changes to be made in the style of the source code:

Change "==University of Wittenberg==" into "===University of Wittenberg==="

Add "==Ministry and Later Years==" to the line before the one referenced in the previous suggestion. Reformat if needed. RetroOortus ( talk) 19:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clarification:
Change heading "University of Wittenberg" to a subheading and in its place, put "Ministry and Later Years" RetroOortus ( talk) 19:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook