This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mainichi Shimbun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exactly what is "Mainichi" mentioned twice in the article - I suppose it's the publishing company; I feel it should be introduced as a separate entity or else just called "Mainichi Shinbun". -- Schnolle 05:24, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
There is a man, Kennosuke Sato, who apparently worked for Mainichi Shimbun; the article claims he spoke English, and I've found an old article which quotes from his articles (in English), without mentioning whether the quotes were translated or not. Was the Shimbun publishing English language articles back in the 1930s and 1940s? -- Gwern (contribs) 16:02 7 November 2007 (GMT)
I removed a bunch of edits from this poster which were 1) non-NPOV and 2) in poor English. Osakadave ( talk) 14:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
I undo Infomation. 1) Hide FACT 2) So my Engrish is poor ,Please edit it.
What is non-NPOV ?
MATA-KEYWORD HISROTY is non-NPOV ?
All lists of the article are quoted here. Did you delete the quoted article?
Miyatoua —Preceding comment was added at 22:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
NPOV is "Neutral Point of View".
Your posts are not neutral to this subj Osakadave ( talk) 15:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)ect.
What the heck do you mean by "Peculiar meta-keywords in website"? That makes no sense. Osakadave ( talk) 15:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Though I also think that those who dispose are him. It is a thoughtless act to write disposal person's name by presumption here. Enough only in the official position.
Miyatoua —Preceding comment was added at 23:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
We'd better split WaiWai incident into a new page, entitled "Mainichi Daily News WaiWai scandal" for example.
The problems existed in running a column for MDN Web site, not in editing the newspaper in Japanese or the extinct newspaper Mainichi Daily News. However, it's not clear whether "Mainichi" means the newspaper or the media company in the current article, which is now handling the both; and what is worse, even "Mainichi Daily News" is redirected to this article page. How confusing!
We cannot but make a long section if we try to explain accurately this incident. To keep the proportion and clearly show it was a scandal on MDN Web site, we'd better split this incident into a new article created only for it. -- Dumpty-Humpty ( talk) 03:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Japanese Wikipedia has a separate entry for it already: 毎日デイリーニューズWaiWai問題. Might be a good reference. Hill of Beans ( talk) 23:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I undid revision as of 10:00, 11 August 2008, because that included two partial copies (of the English edition) of a comment from a member of the Open Newspaper Committee, which appeared on this page of MDN site. Carrying such a content may (1) infringe copyrights of Mainichi Newspapers and / or of the member, (2) interfere with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, I think.
The text in this section reads as though it were written by someone who was part of the campaign against WaiWai or some editor at Mainichi trying to save face. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.244.215 ( talk) 09:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Someone want to edit/delete this sectiom - it makes no sense and if you try to interpret it it isn't NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auto98uk ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 23:53, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mainichi Shimbun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Mainichi Shimbun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
There were a number of edits to change the name of the newspaper to Shinbun, but most references are as Shimbun, which seems to be the correct name. The title page should be changed. werldwayd ( talk) 18:56, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Why is 1314 W. McDermott Dr, Allen (Dallas) Texas USA (Central Region) a part of Seibu Head Office (西部本社, Seibu Honsha)? If it's a legitimate address, should it be in its own section like US Office or something? google shows this as some unrelated family clinic? guest ( talk) 15:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.64.108.244 ( talk)
The link in the 'Website' section links to www.mainichi.co.jp
I don't know Japanese,but that link seems to point towards their corporate website instead of the newspaper, which seems to be www.mainichi.jp (Without the .co) Pollomonteros ( talk) 02:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mainichi Shimbun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exactly what is "Mainichi" mentioned twice in the article - I suppose it's the publishing company; I feel it should be introduced as a separate entity or else just called "Mainichi Shinbun". -- Schnolle 05:24, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
There is a man, Kennosuke Sato, who apparently worked for Mainichi Shimbun; the article claims he spoke English, and I've found an old article which quotes from his articles (in English), without mentioning whether the quotes were translated or not. Was the Shimbun publishing English language articles back in the 1930s and 1940s? -- Gwern (contribs) 16:02 7 November 2007 (GMT)
I removed a bunch of edits from this poster which were 1) non-NPOV and 2) in poor English. Osakadave ( talk) 14:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
I undo Infomation. 1) Hide FACT 2) So my Engrish is poor ,Please edit it.
What is non-NPOV ?
MATA-KEYWORD HISROTY is non-NPOV ?
All lists of the article are quoted here. Did you delete the quoted article?
Miyatoua —Preceding comment was added at 22:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
NPOV is "Neutral Point of View".
Your posts are not neutral to this subj Osakadave ( talk) 15:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)ect.
What the heck do you mean by "Peculiar meta-keywords in website"? That makes no sense. Osakadave ( talk) 15:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Though I also think that those who dispose are him. It is a thoughtless act to write disposal person's name by presumption here. Enough only in the official position.
Miyatoua —Preceding comment was added at 23:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
We'd better split WaiWai incident into a new page, entitled "Mainichi Daily News WaiWai scandal" for example.
The problems existed in running a column for MDN Web site, not in editing the newspaper in Japanese or the extinct newspaper Mainichi Daily News. However, it's not clear whether "Mainichi" means the newspaper or the media company in the current article, which is now handling the both; and what is worse, even "Mainichi Daily News" is redirected to this article page. How confusing!
We cannot but make a long section if we try to explain accurately this incident. To keep the proportion and clearly show it was a scandal on MDN Web site, we'd better split this incident into a new article created only for it. -- Dumpty-Humpty ( talk) 03:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Japanese Wikipedia has a separate entry for it already: 毎日デイリーニューズWaiWai問題. Might be a good reference. Hill of Beans ( talk) 23:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I undid revision as of 10:00, 11 August 2008, because that included two partial copies (of the English edition) of a comment from a member of the Open Newspaper Committee, which appeared on this page of MDN site. Carrying such a content may (1) infringe copyrights of Mainichi Newspapers and / or of the member, (2) interfere with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, I think.
The text in this section reads as though it were written by someone who was part of the campaign against WaiWai or some editor at Mainichi trying to save face. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.244.215 ( talk) 09:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Someone want to edit/delete this sectiom - it makes no sense and if you try to interpret it it isn't NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auto98uk ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 23:53, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mainichi Shimbun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Mainichi Shimbun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
There were a number of edits to change the name of the newspaper to Shinbun, but most references are as Shimbun, which seems to be the correct name. The title page should be changed. werldwayd ( talk) 18:56, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Why is 1314 W. McDermott Dr, Allen (Dallas) Texas USA (Central Region) a part of Seibu Head Office (西部本社, Seibu Honsha)? If it's a legitimate address, should it be in its own section like US Office or something? google shows this as some unrelated family clinic? guest ( talk) 15:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.64.108.244 ( talk)
The link in the 'Website' section links to www.mainichi.co.jp
I don't know Japanese,but that link seems to point towards their corporate website instead of the newspaper, which seems to be www.mainichi.jp (Without the .co) Pollomonteros ( talk) 02:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)