Made in Canada (TV series) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 16, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Made in Canada (TV series) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 July 2019, and was viewed approximately 10,639 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anyone know why no further DVDs are being made. I've contacted CBC Shop but they had nothing interesting to say 207.171.180.101 03:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Made in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Canadian Paul ( talk · contribs) 22:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Should be able to take care of this one shortly.
Canadian
Paul
22:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Just a few points:
There a few more little things (for example, I feel the lead could be fleshed out a bit, but technically it meets the criteria), but in terms of the GA criteria, I believe that this is it. I'm going to go ahead and place the article on hold for a period of up to seven days so that these concerns can be addressed. I'm always open to discussion so if you think I'm wrong on something leave your thoughts here and we'll discuss. I'll be checking this page often, so I should notice any comments left here. Canadian Paul 03:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Walter Görlitz: You reverted my revert instead of discussing per WP:BRD. I'm going to copy the edit summaries here to facilitate discussion – see article history for attribution:
|
So your contention is that the style used in references sets a precedence to determine the style which should be used in the article body. I disagree. MOS:DATEUNIFY says that dates in the body should follow one format and that dates in the references should follow one format, but does not say that these must be the same format. It does note that one of the valid formats for the references is to follow the style of the article body, but it never says that a valid style for the article body is to follow the style of the references. Thus, if anything, the article body takes precedence.
However, even if you're right about that, you're wrong about the first date established in the references. Dated references were first added to the article in this edit which established dmy dates. If someone later changed these to mdy without discussion, that would be in violation of MOS:RETAIN.
I see no evidence to support your inference that there must have been forethought in the reference date style being changed to mdy. There was nothing on the talk page and nothing stands out in the edit summaries, so it seems to have been a stealth edit. On the other hand, {{ Use dmy dates|date=June 2019}} was added following a major expansion/rewrite and GOCE copy edit and during GA/DYK review, which I'd think shows some level of forethought and consultation. – Reidgreg ( talk) 17:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
On December 19, this good article was moved Made in Canada → Made in Canada (TV series) with no discussion notice on this talk page. A related move has been proposed:
An editor has requested for Made in Canada to be moved to Made in Canada label. Since you had some involvement with Made in Canada, you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so). – Reidgreg ( talk) 17:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Made in Canada (TV series) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 16, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Made in Canada (TV series) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 July 2019, and was viewed approximately 10,639 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anyone know why no further DVDs are being made. I've contacted CBC Shop but they had nothing interesting to say 207.171.180.101 03:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Made in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Canadian Paul ( talk · contribs) 22:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Should be able to take care of this one shortly.
Canadian
Paul
22:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Just a few points:
There a few more little things (for example, I feel the lead could be fleshed out a bit, but technically it meets the criteria), but in terms of the GA criteria, I believe that this is it. I'm going to go ahead and place the article on hold for a period of up to seven days so that these concerns can be addressed. I'm always open to discussion so if you think I'm wrong on something leave your thoughts here and we'll discuss. I'll be checking this page often, so I should notice any comments left here. Canadian Paul 03:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Walter Görlitz: You reverted my revert instead of discussing per WP:BRD. I'm going to copy the edit summaries here to facilitate discussion – see article history for attribution:
|
So your contention is that the style used in references sets a precedence to determine the style which should be used in the article body. I disagree. MOS:DATEUNIFY says that dates in the body should follow one format and that dates in the references should follow one format, but does not say that these must be the same format. It does note that one of the valid formats for the references is to follow the style of the article body, but it never says that a valid style for the article body is to follow the style of the references. Thus, if anything, the article body takes precedence.
However, even if you're right about that, you're wrong about the first date established in the references. Dated references were first added to the article in this edit which established dmy dates. If someone later changed these to mdy without discussion, that would be in violation of MOS:RETAIN.
I see no evidence to support your inference that there must have been forethought in the reference date style being changed to mdy. There was nothing on the talk page and nothing stands out in the edit summaries, so it seems to have been a stealth edit. On the other hand, {{ Use dmy dates|date=June 2019}} was added following a major expansion/rewrite and GOCE copy edit and during GA/DYK review, which I'd think shows some level of forethought and consultation. – Reidgreg ( talk) 17:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
On December 19, this good article was moved Made in Canada → Made in Canada (TV series) with no discussion notice on this talk page. A related move has been proposed:
An editor has requested for Made in Canada to be moved to Made in Canada label. Since you had some involvement with Made in Canada, you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so). – Reidgreg ( talk) 17:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)