This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
A fact from Luisa Zissman appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 February 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page should be speedily deleted because ( Not relevant person , no use to society , not important ) This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- 193.60.79.168 ( talk) 17:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Over the next few days, I will be stubbing down the article by removing all material that is not biographical and directly relevant to the subject. After that, I will try to find sources with which to construct from the ground up, something that is at least "sober" enough if not "respecable". Any assistance will be appreciated. -- Ohc ¡digame! 12:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
i think this edit went too far, and part of Zissman's personhood is tied to her sexuality at least, and any good biography would include such basic content. Perhaps that could be woven back into the article? Sportfan5000 ( talk) 14:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Before I run Reflinks on it, would you consider the Express reliable? It is certainly better than the Daily Mail.-- Laun chba ller 18:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
What does her business dealings have to do with her sex life, which is what this section is about? There are plenty of policy guidelines to follow. Try WP:DUE, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV and WP:FANCRUFT for starters. BTW, I'm not entirely sure about your 'what do our customers, the viewers, want to know?' idea for articles and content. There is much more to prudent content creation as you should have learned from your abortive attempt to create Jasmine Waltz which was not appreciated by the community at large. Leaky Caldron 19:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
This has been removed. It is normal to include personal life info on bios. Whilst in CBB, she talked at length about her sex life, bisexuality and daughter. There is justification for not including the name and date of birth of her daughter, but the rest, including her marriage and separation, is relevant biographical info. Even her maiden name is missing from the article.
Most notable people's personal lives are not notable and notability typically comes from a person's career. Like it or not, Zissman is a public figure, and she had passed our notability requirements. She is notable as a television personality rather than as a businesswoman, but she is not unique in that regard. Jim Michael ( talk) 12:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Her birthday is 1987 and it says she married in 2001. Did she get married when she was 14 years old? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.251.223.9 ( talk) 06:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
I removed the word Jewish that had been used to describe her husband as a "Jewish entrepreneur." The description that follows regarding his company makes no mention of religion so there is no reason to bring up his religion in this way. It seems wholly unnecessary to unilaterally mention his religion when there is no policy to mention the religion or lack there of of everyone else mentioned in an article - he's not even the subject of this article. Point of fact, Luisa's religion (or, again, lack thereof) isn't mentioned even mentioned in the article. 24.212.138.36 ( talk) 05:49, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Luisa Zissman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
A fact from Luisa Zissman appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 February 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page should be speedily deleted because ( Not relevant person , no use to society , not important ) This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- 193.60.79.168 ( talk) 17:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Over the next few days, I will be stubbing down the article by removing all material that is not biographical and directly relevant to the subject. After that, I will try to find sources with which to construct from the ground up, something that is at least "sober" enough if not "respecable". Any assistance will be appreciated. -- Ohc ¡digame! 12:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
i think this edit went too far, and part of Zissman's personhood is tied to her sexuality at least, and any good biography would include such basic content. Perhaps that could be woven back into the article? Sportfan5000 ( talk) 14:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Before I run Reflinks on it, would you consider the Express reliable? It is certainly better than the Daily Mail.-- Laun chba ller 18:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
What does her business dealings have to do with her sex life, which is what this section is about? There are plenty of policy guidelines to follow. Try WP:DUE, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV and WP:FANCRUFT for starters. BTW, I'm not entirely sure about your 'what do our customers, the viewers, want to know?' idea for articles and content. There is much more to prudent content creation as you should have learned from your abortive attempt to create Jasmine Waltz which was not appreciated by the community at large. Leaky Caldron 19:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
This has been removed. It is normal to include personal life info on bios. Whilst in CBB, she talked at length about her sex life, bisexuality and daughter. There is justification for not including the name and date of birth of her daughter, but the rest, including her marriage and separation, is relevant biographical info. Even her maiden name is missing from the article.
Most notable people's personal lives are not notable and notability typically comes from a person's career. Like it or not, Zissman is a public figure, and she had passed our notability requirements. She is notable as a television personality rather than as a businesswoman, but she is not unique in that regard. Jim Michael ( talk) 12:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Her birthday is 1987 and it says she married in 2001. Did she get married when she was 14 years old? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.251.223.9 ( talk) 06:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
I removed the word Jewish that had been used to describe her husband as a "Jewish entrepreneur." The description that follows regarding his company makes no mention of religion so there is no reason to bring up his religion in this way. It seems wholly unnecessary to unilaterally mention his religion when there is no policy to mention the religion or lack there of of everyone else mentioned in an article - he's not even the subject of this article. Point of fact, Luisa's religion (or, again, lack thereof) isn't mentioned even mentioned in the article. 24.212.138.36 ( talk) 05:49, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Luisa Zissman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)