 | A fact from Love, Lies (2016 film) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 May 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 22:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Love, Lies (2016 film) →
Love, Lies – This title is significantly different. All the other titles are called "Love Lies", while this title has a comma.
JE98 (
talk)
20:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 20:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- @ JE98: To many people a stray comma is not very rememberable. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 20:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Still too easily confused. Saying a single comma makes it "significantly different" doesn't exactly help the credibility of the argument being presented.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
21:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- The comma does change the meaning from either a noun and verb, or an adjective and noun, to a noun and a noun. Station1 ( talk) 22:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – A comma is not a great disambiguator. Dicklyon ( talk) 04:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support, per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Nine Zulu queens ( talk) 09:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Strong oppose, ironically per WP:SMALLDETAILS (this is a classic example of exactly what WP:SMALLDETAILS should prevent). In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per In ictu oculi. Too easily confused. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 03:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
|
| A fact from Love, Lies (2016 film) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 May 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 22:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Love, Lies (2016 film) →
Love, Lies – This title is significantly different. All the other titles are called "Love Lies", while this title has a comma.
JE98 (
talk)
20:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 20:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- @ JE98: To many people a stray comma is not very rememberable. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 20:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Still too easily confused. Saying a single comma makes it "significantly different" doesn't exactly help the credibility of the argument being presented.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
21:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- The comma does change the meaning from either a noun and verb, or an adjective and noun, to a noun and a noun. Station1 ( talk) 22:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – A comma is not a great disambiguator. Dicklyon ( talk) 04:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support, per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Nine Zulu queens ( talk) 09:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Strong oppose, ironically per WP:SMALLDETAILS (this is a classic example of exactly what WP:SMALLDETAILS should prevent). In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per In ictu oculi. Too easily confused. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 03:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.