![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently F-35 article development portion looks very promotional and barely mentions all of the information in this article. Should we add this information to the main F-35 article to make it more neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConcernedCitizenWC ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
The development section reads like an aggregation of news articles and arguments back and forth over the merits of the aircraft, with a few sentences from an source criticizing it, and then another few sentences from a source defending it. I suppose this might be useful if someone really wants to read a record of all the back and forth in the media over the F-35, but unless I'm mistaken, I don't recall this being purpose of Wikipedia or an encyclopedia in general. The amount of minutia is completely in excess of what can be considered an encyclopedia article. Quite frankly, in some ways this article is more verbose and yet less informative about the F-35 development than the section in the main article. I'm tempted to try my hand at fixing this article, but it appears that some are offended by my work in the main F-35 article, so I'm not sure how to proceed here. Steve7c8 ( talk) 06:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Glancing through this, the history of the F-35 appears to stop in 2016. What has happened since then? Has the F-35 been improved? Have the flaws been fixed? Has it performed well in real-world scenarios? If this page has answers, they're hard to find. Sonicsuns ( talk) 09:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently F-35 article development portion looks very promotional and barely mentions all of the information in this article. Should we add this information to the main F-35 article to make it more neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConcernedCitizenWC ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
The development section reads like an aggregation of news articles and arguments back and forth over the merits of the aircraft, with a few sentences from an source criticizing it, and then another few sentences from a source defending it. I suppose this might be useful if someone really wants to read a record of all the back and forth in the media over the F-35, but unless I'm mistaken, I don't recall this being purpose of Wikipedia or an encyclopedia in general. The amount of minutia is completely in excess of what can be considered an encyclopedia article. Quite frankly, in some ways this article is more verbose and yet less informative about the F-35 development than the section in the main article. I'm tempted to try my hand at fixing this article, but it appears that some are offended by my work in the main F-35 article, so I'm not sure how to proceed here. Steve7c8 ( talk) 06:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Glancing through this, the history of the F-35 appears to stop in 2016. What has happened since then? Has the F-35 been improved? Have the flaws been fixed? Has it performed well in real-world scenarios? If this page has answers, they're hard to find. Sonicsuns ( talk) 09:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)