This article was nominated for deletion on 13 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I believe Logan's Run and Planet of the Apes each ran for one season. I seem to recall that The Ghost and Mrs Muir was quite a successful sitcom in the 1960s, running for at least 2 seasons, based on a movie from at least a decade earlier. Lee M 18:55, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I dont like the arrangement of "successful" and "short lived" : it seems quite POV. "Successful", as applied to the list as it stands, seems rather arbitrary. If "Successful" refers to longevity, then I have a real problem with some of these: I recall, "Clueless" was a "blink and you missed it" series, as was "Honey I Shrunk[sic] the Kids", but if I moved them, I'd probably start the mother-of-all-edit-wars-that-don't-involve-German-names-of-towns-in-Poland. I think it should go back to a straightforward alphabetical listing, perhaps with years that the show ran. Dukeofomnium 15:47, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
How long does a TV show have to run to be considered successful? Two years? Three? Would it be better to just have a single list, and add the years (as in "1998-2002") for each? Then people could decide for themself.
Under the new format, does anyone know where Barbershop: The Series and Party Girl would fit? I'm not familar enough with either series to know whether they are sequels or remakes. -- Bacteria 07:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Might the TV Series 24 count as a remake of the movie Nick of Time (John Badham, 1995)? Plot device of both (re 24 at least the first series): bad guys kidnap a man's daughter and tell him they will murder her if he does not assasinate some politician for them. Artistic device of both: the story unfolds in 'real time' (1.5 hours in the movie, 24 hours in the TV series). I don't know if there's any formal connection/agreement between the producers of the two.
I am taking off Godzilla as that has a long history of it being released as movies themselves and the 1998 film is a remake of the 1954 original —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Willirennen ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Why is Sit Down, Shut Up included on this list if this list is of TV shows that were based on movies? If Sit Down, Shut Up was a movie, it's article needs to state that, if not, it needs to be removed. I'll check back this weekend and delete it if no one objects unless the changes are made before then. Bhall87 ( talk) 19:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Star Trek should not be on this list in any form. The original property that was successful was a TV show, Star Trek, not the movie series. What's the point of this list if it's going to include things that are not TV shows based on films, but TV shows based on TV shows that were also separately adapted to films? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.174.229 ( talk) 17:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Spawn also doesn't belong on this list. The animated series was based on the comic, which the movie was also based on, but the plot of the animated series is not a direct continuation of the movie. They only share elements because they share a common original source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.174.229 ( talk) 17:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
These lists have a number of duplicate entries. These should all be eliminated. Either the TV series is a "prequel" or "sequel" to the movie in question, or it is a straight "adaptation" (aka. a "remake" or a "reimagining") – it can't be both. So an effort needs to be made with any duplicate entries, and figure out if they belong in the "prequel"/"sequel" table list, or in the later "adaptations" list. -- IJBall ( talk) 19:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I personally don't feel such a section is needed (we can simply add such series once they premiere...), but if a section like that is to be included it MUST be fully sourced – as all in-production, yet-to-premiere series must be fully sourced as per usual Wikipedia guidelines – likely with a source that includes the series' premiere date. As the "Upcoming" section that had been added was completely without sourcing, I have removed (as other editors had attempted to do in the recent past). It should not be readded without adequate sourcing for the entries. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
After building up a properly sourced 'Upcoming' section, an IP then removed the entire section on April 5 (in a WP:POINT-y edit?...). Frankly, I think this is the best outcome, as an 'Upcoming' section is just going to continue to be problematic, and the article doesn't need an 'Upcoming' section. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 14:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of television programs based on films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
I've been meaning to bring this up for a while, but the SCOPE of this article needs to be spelled out so that it is clear that this list includes only TV programs spawned from theatrical films.
In other words, an entry like London's Burning (TV series) has no place in an article like this, as it is simply a TV series spawned from a backdoor pilot TV movie, not a theatrical film.
In the near future, I will endeavor to search through this list, and remove those entries that involve just TV movie precursors, unless there is further discussion about this issue here... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 23:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
A good number of entries on this list are series that are arguably based on earlier works that are not movies (i.e. the series and movies are each based on the same source material), such as Bates Motel (the movie Psycho was originally a book), The Odd Couple (movie based on a play), and The Wizard of Oz/Oz Kids (most Oz books are in the public domain, so derivations can be freely made without referencing the heavily copyrighted elements of the 1939 movie). In all of these cases, the movie was popular enough to drive production of a TV series but it cannot be explicitly true in all cases that the TV series is "based on" the film -- they are based on the book, play, or whatever. HalJor ( talk) 17:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
...said the storyline for the proposed series will be largely “autonomous” from the “Avengers” sequel feature that is also in the works. The series will revolve around the activities of the top-secret S.H.I.E.L.D espionage org featured in “Avengers.”So, is it based on the films? Is it not based on the films?... I can't tell. But I also can't tell if it's "adapted directly from the comics" either.... Honestly, it is unsourced, so I think I'm going to take it back out for now. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 04:06, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Not sure how you couldn't find any source talking about the Agents of SHIELD being in the MCU [1], [2], [3] as any wikipedia article talking about the series or the MCU will have tons of sources for it. Here are a few. -- Gonnym ( talk) 22:45, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
These television series follow the events of the original theatrical filmincludes Agents of SHIELD; so if SHIELD is out of the scope, you should define what exactly you want this list to include, cause atm it really looks like you, not the sources, have a problem with including it in the list... -- Gonnym ( talk) 13:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
These television series follow the events of the original theatrical film. Both of these include SHIELD. Either change the title of the article or deal with it that some forms of media will not fit in to your own definition, and instead relay on RS who do say that SHIELD follows the events of the film.
and are set within the same universe. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I believe Logan's Run and Planet of the Apes each ran for one season. I seem to recall that The Ghost and Mrs Muir was quite a successful sitcom in the 1960s, running for at least 2 seasons, based on a movie from at least a decade earlier. Lee M 18:55, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I dont like the arrangement of "successful" and "short lived" : it seems quite POV. "Successful", as applied to the list as it stands, seems rather arbitrary. If "Successful" refers to longevity, then I have a real problem with some of these: I recall, "Clueless" was a "blink and you missed it" series, as was "Honey I Shrunk[sic] the Kids", but if I moved them, I'd probably start the mother-of-all-edit-wars-that-don't-involve-German-names-of-towns-in-Poland. I think it should go back to a straightforward alphabetical listing, perhaps with years that the show ran. Dukeofomnium 15:47, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
How long does a TV show have to run to be considered successful? Two years? Three? Would it be better to just have a single list, and add the years (as in "1998-2002") for each? Then people could decide for themself.
Under the new format, does anyone know where Barbershop: The Series and Party Girl would fit? I'm not familar enough with either series to know whether they are sequels or remakes. -- Bacteria 07:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Might the TV Series 24 count as a remake of the movie Nick of Time (John Badham, 1995)? Plot device of both (re 24 at least the first series): bad guys kidnap a man's daughter and tell him they will murder her if he does not assasinate some politician for them. Artistic device of both: the story unfolds in 'real time' (1.5 hours in the movie, 24 hours in the TV series). I don't know if there's any formal connection/agreement between the producers of the two.
I am taking off Godzilla as that has a long history of it being released as movies themselves and the 1998 film is a remake of the 1954 original —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Willirennen ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Why is Sit Down, Shut Up included on this list if this list is of TV shows that were based on movies? If Sit Down, Shut Up was a movie, it's article needs to state that, if not, it needs to be removed. I'll check back this weekend and delete it if no one objects unless the changes are made before then. Bhall87 ( talk) 19:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Star Trek should not be on this list in any form. The original property that was successful was a TV show, Star Trek, not the movie series. What's the point of this list if it's going to include things that are not TV shows based on films, but TV shows based on TV shows that were also separately adapted to films? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.174.229 ( talk) 17:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Spawn also doesn't belong on this list. The animated series was based on the comic, which the movie was also based on, but the plot of the animated series is not a direct continuation of the movie. They only share elements because they share a common original source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.174.229 ( talk) 17:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
These lists have a number of duplicate entries. These should all be eliminated. Either the TV series is a "prequel" or "sequel" to the movie in question, or it is a straight "adaptation" (aka. a "remake" or a "reimagining") – it can't be both. So an effort needs to be made with any duplicate entries, and figure out if they belong in the "prequel"/"sequel" table list, or in the later "adaptations" list. -- IJBall ( talk) 19:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I personally don't feel such a section is needed (we can simply add such series once they premiere...), but if a section like that is to be included it MUST be fully sourced – as all in-production, yet-to-premiere series must be fully sourced as per usual Wikipedia guidelines – likely with a source that includes the series' premiere date. As the "Upcoming" section that had been added was completely without sourcing, I have removed (as other editors had attempted to do in the recent past). It should not be readded without adequate sourcing for the entries. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
After building up a properly sourced 'Upcoming' section, an IP then removed the entire section on April 5 (in a WP:POINT-y edit?...). Frankly, I think this is the best outcome, as an 'Upcoming' section is just going to continue to be problematic, and the article doesn't need an 'Upcoming' section. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 14:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of television programs based on films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
I've been meaning to bring this up for a while, but the SCOPE of this article needs to be spelled out so that it is clear that this list includes only TV programs spawned from theatrical films.
In other words, an entry like London's Burning (TV series) has no place in an article like this, as it is simply a TV series spawned from a backdoor pilot TV movie, not a theatrical film.
In the near future, I will endeavor to search through this list, and remove those entries that involve just TV movie precursors, unless there is further discussion about this issue here... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 23:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
A good number of entries on this list are series that are arguably based on earlier works that are not movies (i.e. the series and movies are each based on the same source material), such as Bates Motel (the movie Psycho was originally a book), The Odd Couple (movie based on a play), and The Wizard of Oz/Oz Kids (most Oz books are in the public domain, so derivations can be freely made without referencing the heavily copyrighted elements of the 1939 movie). In all of these cases, the movie was popular enough to drive production of a TV series but it cannot be explicitly true in all cases that the TV series is "based on" the film -- they are based on the book, play, or whatever. HalJor ( talk) 17:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
...said the storyline for the proposed series will be largely “autonomous” from the “Avengers” sequel feature that is also in the works. The series will revolve around the activities of the top-secret S.H.I.E.L.D espionage org featured in “Avengers.”So, is it based on the films? Is it not based on the films?... I can't tell. But I also can't tell if it's "adapted directly from the comics" either.... Honestly, it is unsourced, so I think I'm going to take it back out for now. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 04:06, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Not sure how you couldn't find any source talking about the Agents of SHIELD being in the MCU [1], [2], [3] as any wikipedia article talking about the series or the MCU will have tons of sources for it. Here are a few. -- Gonnym ( talk) 22:45, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
These television series follow the events of the original theatrical filmincludes Agents of SHIELD; so if SHIELD is out of the scope, you should define what exactly you want this list to include, cause atm it really looks like you, not the sources, have a problem with including it in the list... -- Gonnym ( talk) 13:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
These television series follow the events of the original theatrical film. Both of these include SHIELD. Either change the title of the article or deal with it that some forms of media will not fit in to your own definition, and instead relay on RS who do say that SHIELD follows the events of the film.
and are set within the same universe. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)