This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
she needs to be listed under M for Michelle as on TV that is her surname, please stop moving her back to C for Candice. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 22:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
It is really getting annoying with the recent changes to the Stables and Tag Team section. The stable names are being shuffled around. Some people think the stable should be listed according to the last name of the second person, others say it's the first letter of the stable's name. I say with the stables, we list them alphabetically according to the first letter of the name that the stable is called on TV. So for example, Smackdown should have their tag teams and stables in this order:
Brothers of Destruction (Kane and Undertaker)
Deuce N' Domino with Cherry
Jesse and Fetus
Matt Hardy and MVP
The Major Brothers
24.191.218.83 23:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, first of all... haha you said "fetus". Secondly. I don't understand why (in the example of Hardy/MVP) we would alphabetize by the M in Matt. We don't alphabetize by first names generally and "Matt Hardy and MVP" certainly isn't their tag team name. The way things were organized previously was:
1. list tag teams without tag team names alphabetically, by last name of first member of team. Of course, sometimes a team would typically have their onscreen name normally alphabetically backwards (i.e. Jesse & Festus) so we'd attempt to go by that.
Then 2. alphabetize tag teams with tag team names
So the correct listing would be:
Deuce N' Domino w/Cherry
Matt Hardy and MVP
Jesse and Festus
Brothers of Destruction (Kane and Undertaker)
The Major Brothers
Of course, there would be further debate over whether or not "Deuce N' Domino" is a tag team name etc. etc. Basically there is no right way and pretty much no wrong way. (well, except alphabetizing by M in Matt Hardy :-D ) Dahumorist 18:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I personally don't think that Michelle is her surname. It's an extension of her first name, meaning on screen her first name is "Candice Michelle" not just Candice. Michelle sounds really awkward as a surname, no matter how you look at it. Any thoughts on how this should be listed? There seems to be some dispute. Gavyn Sykes 23:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
if it was an extension of her 1st name it could be Candice-Michelle, the space indicates its her surname. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 08:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
it is an actual surname, in fact it was HER actual surname until she got married. Skitzo 09:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't Ron Simmons be on the active RAW roster, he's been wrestling since September now. He wrestled on Heat 2 weeks straight, appeared on RAW with the rest of the roster on Oct 9. Soo, can we change that?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.234.212 ( talk • contribs)
should we adjust the archives frequency for this page? as the list is increadably long and some topics haven't been touched for a long time. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 21:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I think that the information provided that Krissy Vaine has left by various popular wrestling websites are false, simply because they have no proof. IF indeed she left then we have to wait next week when Torrie Wilson comes back from doing some promotional work and see if it continues the storyline, if in the spoilers of NEXT WEEK do not include Krissy Vaine then the rumors are true but otherwise is just a speculation, it is not 100% confirmed. Therefore her name should remain in the list until we see what happens next week Art 281 03:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
dirt sites can not be trusted.i remember a few months ago when there was a rumor that ric flair had quit a lot of people were wanting to take him off the roster.and in stead he was put on the inactive list.same this when wwe superstarts were suspended for drugs. since no liginimat site could be trusted they were put on the inactive list. the same should be done with Krissy Vaine. SpeedyC1 15:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Y2J is returning to raw at cyber sunday should we put him back on the raw roster list —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dxrule96 ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have source for that? Gavyn Sykes 03:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
As of late it appears dat michelle is now the valet of Chuck Palumbo so dat should b added 2 her page and on the roster page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.233.105 ( talk) 10:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I think it's safe to say that she is now inactive along with Teddy Long. Any other opinions? 24.191.218.83 12:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
probably so, its also rumoured she will be moving to RAW soon as she is the real life girlfriend of Bobby Lashley. Skitzo 17:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Multiple sources have her listed as released, but until the WWE confirms it, I don't think she should be taken off completely. Her name has been deleted a number of times so far. Josborne2382 02:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
SpeedyC1 he has been released, F4W is second only to the wrestling observer in reliability, STOP readding him to the roster as he is no longer employed and WWE won't comment as he was ONLY under developmental contract and they NEVER do. Skitzo 20:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Seconded, SpeedyC1 is starting to get annoying. WWE never comments on releases for developmental talent, the ONLY source is wrestling websites and people within the company. If you need that much verification, check the FCW website in a few weeks and see if he's there or not, and then readd him. Until then, stop being a nuisance. ThisGuy62 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
that is bogus they have announced when devepmental talent has been released. see here. SpeedyC1 04:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Could someone please create a page for the new smackdown backstage interviewer i know a few things about her,her full name is Anastacia Rose McPherson and she was a contestant on the Reality show The Pussycat Dolls:Present which premiered on March 6th,2007.She was the 5th contestant eliminated and she was eliminated on episode 6.She debuted on smackdown on October 12th,2007.So if anyone would like to create her page i would be happy to help.When i find out anymore info bout anastacia i'll add it 2 this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 10:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
i would like to address this before this becomes an issue. maybe of you have read/will read that the two ovw superstars have worked wwe house shows recently. that may be true, but neither one of them can be added to the smackdown or ecw roster pages until they appear on television. Hardyboyz27 19:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
As seen on WWE.com the SmackDown & ECW rosters are now one. I suggest making the SmackDown roster section say SmackDown!/ECW and include all the ECW and SmackDown superstars in that one section. I'd do it myself but I don't have the time right now. JakeDHS07 21:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)JakeDHS07
lets wait and see rumor has it that ecw's contract with sci-fi ends at the end of the year. they probly won't combine the rosters completly until then. SpeedyC1 19:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
as far as iunderstand it they will still have seperate rosters its just they will all compete on both sows so no need to merge the rosters. Skitzo 22:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Beside both King Booker & Queen SHarmell, i suggest putting "expecting release on 27th of October" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.69 ( talk) 21:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I've read on numerous sites that he injured his right shoulder and will be out for up to three months. should we acknowledge that? 24.191.218.14 02:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Here's photo proof of Master's injury Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 02:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Can this article be nominated for featured lists? Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 02:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I think we should nominate it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lex94 ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I think the diva search final 2 Eve Torres and Brooke Gilbertson should be added to On Air Talent for raw since they appeared on raw on october 22nd and the winner will be anounced at either Cyber Sunday this weekend or on Raw october 29th. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Wat show roster should diva search winner Eve Torres be added to?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 03:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, her name has been deleted and put back several times now, and I am not about to get involved in an edit war. Other sites have reported on her release, even her own <yspace has "alluded" to her release (she did not specifically come out and say it like Doppy88 said she did). I also did not appreciate the "get over it" comment that Doppy88 directed towards me (oh, and Doppy88 I did not touch Matt Hardy's name, I just didn't notice that it had been removed as well). Wikipedia guidelines say to use verifiable sources when entering content, correct? Well, since her employer, WWE, nor her has said it in any written form, then how can it be put as definite? That is why people keep putting her back on the inactive roster because there is no verifiable proof that she has been released, except for what is on fan sites, and even though they may be correct most of the time, it is still just heresay. I am backing out of this now before it gets out of hand, cause this could keep continuing. I think a consensus needs to be reached here on the talk pages as to remover her from the roster. My view is that until it can be attributed to a reputible and verifiable source (i.e. WWE or Kristal herself) then she should stay on the inactive roster list. If someone has a link to where she specifically states she was released or is no longer employed, then that is a different story. I am going to put her back this time, but after this, I am not going to touch it. Thanks! Josborne2382 03:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to add that the reason Doppy88 used as to the proof of her release is that she said it on her website. Here is the only statement on her Myspace page (her only offical page), the one that wrestling sites are reporting:
I am sorry, but I don't see anywhere in that statement that she is no longer employed with the WWE. Honestly the only proof that I have been able to find is that her profile has been removed from wwe.com, but that doesn't mean anything. Do I think she was released? Yes, but I have no proof that she was. Does anyone? Thanks again! Josborne2382 04:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Her profile has been removed from wwe.com, i know her name has been removed from this article but i thought it may have just been someone who removed it without source seeing as it says she is currently employed on her article and her name isnt on the alumni page. Don.-.J 18:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
i think that she should stay on the roster until an official word is give from either wwe or her. SpeedyC1 21:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Although the dirt sheets aren't necessarily reliable for other things such as storylines, they are usually reliable for matters such as this, and we have actually used them as sources for this particular article in the past. Seeing as a precedent has been set that we allow the dirtsheets as sources for this article, and all of them are reporting she's been released, and people are posting comments on her myspace with their apologies and well wishes about her being released, I think it's safe to say we can confirm she's been released. What other proof is there? Wait 6 months and after she no longer appears on WWE or developmental programming? That's a little ridiculous. WWE.com is slow to take down entrance videos, as evidenced by the fact Marcus Cor Von's is still up there. Bmg916 Speak 13:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
To end the lame edit war. Please use the break to reach consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 18:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
SpeedyC1 and myself have worked together and reached a possible compromise regarding the Kristal Marshall situation. We agree that the way her article is now is fine, since it does not explicitly say she was released and is vague enough since her status is disputed here on the wiki. As for this article, we believe that the following can satisfy all sides until some sort of official announcement is made: We list Kristal under inactive talent, but with the description of employment status with the company (legit) unknown. until we get an official word from either her or WWE. Thoughts? Bmg916 Speak 19:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Doppy88 Go to the site you provided, it provides a link to her myspace page, that myspace page says it is her official myspace page and then states if you want to go to her official website to click the image, when you click the image it does NOT go back to the original site, It goes to a different site. Thus meaning if you truly believe the site you provided, then you believe the myspace page it provides, and if you believe the myspace page it proves the original one you provided is in fact NOT her OFFICIAL site. With that being said there is no proof which is real, so you can't believe any of them. Aladdin Zane 13:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Official website or not argument aside, we can't agree on whether we have confirmation she was released or not. This is why the above proposed compromise was brought to the table. I would like to request we comment on said compromise as opposed to whether or not she was released and whether or not we have proof. These arguments are exactly why the above compromise was put together by people on both sides of the argument. So, if we can, let's stick to commenting on that instead of continuing the arguments for definitely one side or the other, thanks! Bmg916 Speak 15:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
That's not how it is worded now, her name is not on the page at all. I think she should be listed under Smackdown/inactive talent: with current status unknown as the reason Aladdin Zane 16:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Should kelly,brooke and layla be added under ecw female wrestler seeing as they occasionally wrestle in diva battle royals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Noe DX are back together put them on tag team list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.103.232 ( talk) 06:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
If u read wwe.com properly u would have read dat DX is reuniting 4 one night only nxt week on raw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Unless they appear together on every show they shouldn't be added back, theres no gurentee they'll even come out to the DX music. Skitzo 10:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to know why Serena is not on the OVW roster under Female wrestlers because i know for a fact she is still in OVW cos she recently had a title match against OVW Women's Champion Roucka.Here's a link to her biopage http://www.ovwrestling.com/Superstars/Divas/serena.htm.
Unless she's under contract she doesn't belong on this page, OVW is not exclusive t people under WWE contract.
Skitzo 08:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Who is Mr Hollywood? i've never heard of him or seen him on raw.So y is he on the raw roster? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 05:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
stop adding them as wrestlers they are not full time wrestlers so leave them in other on-sreen talent with the tag occasional wreslters. Skitzo 21:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Some people have noticed that the diva pages have been removed from wwe.com. No one can be sure why, maybe its some sort of glitch, or they have decided to redo all of the diva pages. But they are still employed by WWE so they should stay in this article. Don.-.J 00:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
The divas are probably off to remove Brooke and Kristal from the website WWEBoffin0101 16:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
They were already off before the rest came off. And this conversation is starting to get forum-like, so I am going to suggest we stop now. Bmg916 Speak 17:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
HORNSWOGGLE IS NO LONGER ON SMACKDOWN. WHEN HE ENTERS THE RING AND HIS NAME COMES UP, HE HAS A RAW SIGN NOW, NOT A SMACKDOWN ONE. GET HIM ON THE RAW ROSTER.
has anyone picked up the latest wwe magazine. there i a rumor going around that chris jehrico is on the cover.Bleek25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleek25 ( talk • contribs) 16:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
it has been confirmed he is on the cover, however until he appears on TV or ppv he still shouldn't be added. Skitzo 11:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
leave him off until he debuts, as we don't yet know which show he will be on.-- Skitzo ( talk) 18:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
we can assign him to unassigned talent. -- 24.191.218.83 ( talk) 20:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
There is actually no source that says anything about Jericho's status. Yes, the magazine suggests that he will be working for them, but has WWE/Jericho made an announcement saying he is definitely employed by WWE? No. Has he appeared on WWE television? No. Has WWE mentioned Jericho in its programming on television or online? No. Does any reliable source list him as being on the roster? No. -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 09:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I added him to unassigned talent, both F4W and the Wrestling Observe have said he will debut either at Survivor Series or on the Following RAW, they would not of put him on the magazine if he were not under contract to them. Skitzo ( talk) 10:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Someone needs to add him to the roster page!
her reason for being inactive is changed on the roster everyday. we need to decide on what to put next to her name. i suggest "currently (kayfabe) suspended". other suggestions? Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 01:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
i assume nobody cares? then we'll just leave it at, "currently inactive" 24.191.218.83 ( talk) 11:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
it will stay inactive until she is able to appear in wwe live event again. besides, she's still under contract. 12.127.178.158 22:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
they had one match together, and are facing each other at armageddon so would we call them a tag team? NiciVampireHeart 16:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
there is absolutely no way to know when a superstar will return to the roster. please do not add a return date or time next to the inactive superstar's name. there is no way of knowing. the only thing that should be next to their name is the reason for being inactive. Hardyboyz27 12:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
She has not appered on WWE television in over a year and there is no source to confirm she is still employed by the WWE. Bencey ( talk) 23:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Sunny's got to be removed from the "Inactive Talent" section, cos she's not RETURNING as such on Monday Night, she's just making a guest appearance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Excessbaggage80 ( talk • contribs) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
since when has Teddy Long been demoted to Assistant GM? Vickie was HIS assistant then Acting-GM during his "heart attack" Skitzo ( talk) 19:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone should add him to the inactive talent because on the WWE website it says he was injured this past friday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.88.127.189 ( talk) 05:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Recently, Truco9311 has been adding a citation for everyone's being on the list. Is this really necessary? Hezekiah957 ( talk) 17:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
If that is what it takes then it is better off not a featured list. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes it most certaintly is a bad thing if it is done to an outrageous degree. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
the problem is developmental roster changes are often hard to verify, especially as some people won't accept the Wrestling Observer web site/newspaper as a source, yet it tends to be the most credible independent news source available. BTW who approved adding them? i certainly wasn't asked, they are not necessary for the article Skitzo ( talk) 18:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Fat Man: From the very beginning of that article: " All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation" The information you are providing references for is not challengeable, it is common knowledge. I see no one challenging something they can view on their TV every week and if you actually edited this article on a regular basis you would see no one comes here to challenge that information, such as if Triple H is indeed on the Raw roster. All of this is unneeded and simply clutters up the article. If you want to reference some of the developmental superstars with links verifying they have signed a contract go ahead, but what's been done so far is just ridiculous. I'm sure no one here that edits this article on a daily basis would want to sacrifice the look of the article for some "featured list" standing. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't think the choice should be in the hands of some project, but instead the editors of this article who work hard to keep it accurate every day. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
ROFL and what gives you that authority? I simply suggest we wait until the other editors of this article voice their opinion on this issue. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
this is a stupid idea. all it is doing is adding junk to an already good page
Davnel03 (
talk) 19:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Striking comment by indef blocked user.
Dav
nel
03 22:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
The little squares are not at every name, they are under the notes section. That looks fine to me. Doppy88 ( talk) 19:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
It's pointless to continue argueing right now. Every editor of this page please go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPT:PW#WWE_Roster to either agree or disagree on this change.
Doppy88 ( talk) 19:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
To just give my opinion on the ongoing debate, I say that putting the citation next to the superstars' names was a great idea. The idea of Wikipedia is to give everyone who views the site, the most information there is to know. By adding the links to their profiles, Wikipedia viewers can get a look at the superstar's character on their television program. The WWE profiles allow fans to see videos, pictures, and other features about the superstar that Wikipedia does not have to offer. I approve. Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 19:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
However, they can simply click the superstar's wiki article and then link to their WWE profile from there. Citations should not function as links for more information, that's what the article is for. Doppy88 ( talk) 19:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
As I do agree with that, I think that the citations make is a little bit easier for users if the link to the WWE profile is on the main roster's page. Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 19:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
100% agree with Truco9311. Just one question? Why are the citations not added to the ECW Superstars and the Raw Divas? Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 20:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
there is a link to the WWE roster page at the bottom it would be easy to add 1 for OVW and FCW as well, i don't see the need for a link to each person when they already have it in their individual articles, it's a good idea but not 1 that we need IMO, you could always link to the RAW, SmackDown and ECW rosters in the header on their sections. Skitzo ( talk) 21:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Why are two guys new to this trying to change the way thing are.This page was just fine before they came. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleek25 ( talk • contribs) 21:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Skitzouk, Bleek and any others, the only way to stop this is to vote here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPT:PW#WWE_Roster. They obviously think their project has more authority over us by holding the vote on their own page instead of on the page where the dispute is actually taking place. If you don't vote there they'll simply ignore us. Doppy88 ( talk) 21:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
it's not "their project", i too am a member of Project:Professional wrestling, tbh this issue is not something that i'm all that bothered about and will go along with the majority, however that doesn't change the fact i don't think its needed. Skitzo ( talk) 22:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
true but it does seem every so often some newbies turn up and make a fuss about nothing and in this case take it upon themselves to change something without getting consensus 1st. Skitzo ( talk) 23:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Why does it bring you to a Ric Flair page when you click on his son's name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennedyniles ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Because he isn't yet notible enough for his own article. Skitzo ( talk) 22:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
The wrestlers real names should not be on this page. This page should follow the rules of "kayfabe" and not mention the auctual names of the wrestlers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.250.188 ( talk) 21:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
no only that but wrestlers change name some times.if we didn't have their real name there would be alot of pages on wrestles ring names that are not used any more. Bleek25 ( talk) 18:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone added him back to the main raw roster, i moved him to inactive as he hasn't actually yet wrested on the show. Skitzo ( talk) 16:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
He has been moved back to the Smackdown section, as he has not officially been changed, by the WWE, to RAW. On WWE.com, he is still on the Smackdown roster. Michaelclarkc 18:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.216.2 ( talk)
he should be on the inactive. wwe.com has 2 articles about his return to the ring on the raw brand S-PAC 54 04:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Who keeps putting JBL on RAW? At this moment, he is still on the Smackdown page on WWE.com. Until WWE.com put his profile on RAW, he is still a Smackdown superstar. The same goes for Tazz. He filled in for JBL this week on Smackdown, but that won't air until tomorrow night, therefore Tazz is still on ECW. Michaelclarkc 18:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelclarkc ( talk • contribs)
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! Whoever is constantly putting JBL on RAW & Tazz on Smackdown.....QUIT IT! On WWE.com JBL is still on Smackdown, and will remain there until the WWE officially put him on the RAW roster. The same goes for Tazz. Tazz appearing on Smackdown happens on Smackdown tonight, but it hasn't aired on TV yet, and it could have been for one night only. So once again, STOP CHANGING IT UNTIL WWE MAKE IT OFFICIAL! Michaelclarkc 17:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC) ( talk)
I Think this...
...should be listed. thoughts?-- 72.186.88.137 ( talk) 01:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The above is the full stable. They should be listed as so in the tag teams / stables section. does anyone have anything wrong with that? Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 02:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe this is long overdue, but there are a handful of talents listed on this page whose status is a bit questionable or has been stagnant for a lengthy period of time. These people include: Matt Capotelli, Chris Rombola, Mike DiBiase, Eddie Colon, Mariusz Puczko, and Beaulah McGillicutty. I think maybe we should try to investigate the status of these talents, since nobody has been able to find reports that they are, in fact, no longer with the company as of this point. Does anyone agree? Dahumorist ( talk) 17:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I e-mailed the webmaster of the UPW site asking about Puczko, so hopefully he'll get back to me soon with some info. Dahumorist ( talk) 17:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
The article should not list the team of Carlito and Santino as Cantino. That is the shorter name, but they do not announce the team as Cantino, just like they don't announce London and Kendrick as Londrick, it's just easier to type. If Carlito/Marella was listed Cantino, then London/Kendrick should be listed Londrick. But since thats not what WWE announces them as, we can't use those names. iMatthew ( talk) 12:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
according to wwe.com lance cade has received a shoulder injury at raws live event in atlanta georgia on friday night —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.164.143 ( talk) 18:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Isn't McIntire on Smackdown? What is he doing on the RAW page? Baseball16 ( talk) 17:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I read Drew McIntre was moving to raw on Lords Of Pain But Because he is still on the Smackdown page on WWE.com he should remain on smackdown until it is cofirmed by WWE. If he does move to raw does that mean Dave Taylor will move too?
Jimmy1994(UTC)
I read in a smackdown show report that Jonathan Coachman was announced as the replacement for JBL on the show, which will air on friday by Vickie Guerrerro as the new colour commentator alongside Michael Cole on Smackdown. Should we add him to the smackdown roster page. or wait untill the show is on. Jimmy1994(UTC)
funny but unacicary —Preceding unsigned comment added by The real rj ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
there seems to be a small dispute over his roster status, I just checked WWE.com and he remains on the smackdown roster page, so I think that for now we should leave him on there. Skitzo ( talk) 18:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Chavo Guerrerro is still a smackdown wrestler and only wrestles on ECW because of the talent exchange and as far as I know there is no plans for him to move to ECW. 172.143.6.44 ( talk) 21:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Why has Jonathan coachman been moved from Raw to Smackdown. Most people including me know that he is moving to be colour commentator on Smackdown but that has not been confirmed by WWE and is therefore a spoiler. Once the show airs on friday then he should be added to smackdown but until then he should still be on the Raw roster. 172.143.6.44 ( talk) 21:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone should move Ashley Massaro to the inactive roster on RAW because it states on her fansite, [4] that she redeuted at a RAW houseshow and will permantly be moved to RAW. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.105.237 ( talk) 07:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
she needs to be listed under M for Michelle as on TV that is her surname, please stop moving her back to C for Candice. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 22:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
It is really getting annoying with the recent changes to the Stables and Tag Team section. The stable names are being shuffled around. Some people think the stable should be listed according to the last name of the second person, others say it's the first letter of the stable's name. I say with the stables, we list them alphabetically according to the first letter of the name that the stable is called on TV. So for example, Smackdown should have their tag teams and stables in this order:
Brothers of Destruction (Kane and Undertaker)
Deuce N' Domino with Cherry
Jesse and Fetus
Matt Hardy and MVP
The Major Brothers
24.191.218.83 23:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, first of all... haha you said "fetus". Secondly. I don't understand why (in the example of Hardy/MVP) we would alphabetize by the M in Matt. We don't alphabetize by first names generally and "Matt Hardy and MVP" certainly isn't their tag team name. The way things were organized previously was:
1. list tag teams without tag team names alphabetically, by last name of first member of team. Of course, sometimes a team would typically have their onscreen name normally alphabetically backwards (i.e. Jesse & Festus) so we'd attempt to go by that.
Then 2. alphabetize tag teams with tag team names
So the correct listing would be:
Deuce N' Domino w/Cherry
Matt Hardy and MVP
Jesse and Festus
Brothers of Destruction (Kane and Undertaker)
The Major Brothers
Of course, there would be further debate over whether or not "Deuce N' Domino" is a tag team name etc. etc. Basically there is no right way and pretty much no wrong way. (well, except alphabetizing by M in Matt Hardy :-D ) Dahumorist 18:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I personally don't think that Michelle is her surname. It's an extension of her first name, meaning on screen her first name is "Candice Michelle" not just Candice. Michelle sounds really awkward as a surname, no matter how you look at it. Any thoughts on how this should be listed? There seems to be some dispute. Gavyn Sykes 23:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
if it was an extension of her 1st name it could be Candice-Michelle, the space indicates its her surname. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 08:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
it is an actual surname, in fact it was HER actual surname until she got married. Skitzo 09:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't Ron Simmons be on the active RAW roster, he's been wrestling since September now. He wrestled on Heat 2 weeks straight, appeared on RAW with the rest of the roster on Oct 9. Soo, can we change that?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.234.212 ( talk • contribs)
should we adjust the archives frequency for this page? as the list is increadably long and some topics haven't been touched for a long time. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 21:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I think that the information provided that Krissy Vaine has left by various popular wrestling websites are false, simply because they have no proof. IF indeed she left then we have to wait next week when Torrie Wilson comes back from doing some promotional work and see if it continues the storyline, if in the spoilers of NEXT WEEK do not include Krissy Vaine then the rumors are true but otherwise is just a speculation, it is not 100% confirmed. Therefore her name should remain in the list until we see what happens next week Art 281 03:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
dirt sites can not be trusted.i remember a few months ago when there was a rumor that ric flair had quit a lot of people were wanting to take him off the roster.and in stead he was put on the inactive list.same this when wwe superstarts were suspended for drugs. since no liginimat site could be trusted they were put on the inactive list. the same should be done with Krissy Vaine. SpeedyC1 15:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Y2J is returning to raw at cyber sunday should we put him back on the raw roster list —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dxrule96 ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have source for that? Gavyn Sykes 03:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
As of late it appears dat michelle is now the valet of Chuck Palumbo so dat should b added 2 her page and on the roster page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.233.105 ( talk) 10:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I think it's safe to say that she is now inactive along with Teddy Long. Any other opinions? 24.191.218.83 12:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
probably so, its also rumoured she will be moving to RAW soon as she is the real life girlfriend of Bobby Lashley. Skitzo 17:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Multiple sources have her listed as released, but until the WWE confirms it, I don't think she should be taken off completely. Her name has been deleted a number of times so far. Josborne2382 02:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
SpeedyC1 he has been released, F4W is second only to the wrestling observer in reliability, STOP readding him to the roster as he is no longer employed and WWE won't comment as he was ONLY under developmental contract and they NEVER do. Skitzo 20:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Seconded, SpeedyC1 is starting to get annoying. WWE never comments on releases for developmental talent, the ONLY source is wrestling websites and people within the company. If you need that much verification, check the FCW website in a few weeks and see if he's there or not, and then readd him. Until then, stop being a nuisance. ThisGuy62 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
that is bogus they have announced when devepmental talent has been released. see here. SpeedyC1 04:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Could someone please create a page for the new smackdown backstage interviewer i know a few things about her,her full name is Anastacia Rose McPherson and she was a contestant on the Reality show The Pussycat Dolls:Present which premiered on March 6th,2007.She was the 5th contestant eliminated and she was eliminated on episode 6.She debuted on smackdown on October 12th,2007.So if anyone would like to create her page i would be happy to help.When i find out anymore info bout anastacia i'll add it 2 this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 10:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
i would like to address this before this becomes an issue. maybe of you have read/will read that the two ovw superstars have worked wwe house shows recently. that may be true, but neither one of them can be added to the smackdown or ecw roster pages until they appear on television. Hardyboyz27 19:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
As seen on WWE.com the SmackDown & ECW rosters are now one. I suggest making the SmackDown roster section say SmackDown!/ECW and include all the ECW and SmackDown superstars in that one section. I'd do it myself but I don't have the time right now. JakeDHS07 21:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)JakeDHS07
lets wait and see rumor has it that ecw's contract with sci-fi ends at the end of the year. they probly won't combine the rosters completly until then. SpeedyC1 19:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
as far as iunderstand it they will still have seperate rosters its just they will all compete on both sows so no need to merge the rosters. Skitzo 22:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Beside both King Booker & Queen SHarmell, i suggest putting "expecting release on 27th of October" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.69 ( talk) 21:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I've read on numerous sites that he injured his right shoulder and will be out for up to three months. should we acknowledge that? 24.191.218.14 02:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Here's photo proof of Master's injury Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 02:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Can this article be nominated for featured lists? Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 02:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I think we should nominate it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lex94 ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I think the diva search final 2 Eve Torres and Brooke Gilbertson should be added to On Air Talent for raw since they appeared on raw on october 22nd and the winner will be anounced at either Cyber Sunday this weekend or on Raw october 29th. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Wat show roster should diva search winner Eve Torres be added to?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 03:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, her name has been deleted and put back several times now, and I am not about to get involved in an edit war. Other sites have reported on her release, even her own <yspace has "alluded" to her release (she did not specifically come out and say it like Doppy88 said she did). I also did not appreciate the "get over it" comment that Doppy88 directed towards me (oh, and Doppy88 I did not touch Matt Hardy's name, I just didn't notice that it had been removed as well). Wikipedia guidelines say to use verifiable sources when entering content, correct? Well, since her employer, WWE, nor her has said it in any written form, then how can it be put as definite? That is why people keep putting her back on the inactive roster because there is no verifiable proof that she has been released, except for what is on fan sites, and even though they may be correct most of the time, it is still just heresay. I am backing out of this now before it gets out of hand, cause this could keep continuing. I think a consensus needs to be reached here on the talk pages as to remover her from the roster. My view is that until it can be attributed to a reputible and verifiable source (i.e. WWE or Kristal herself) then she should stay on the inactive roster list. If someone has a link to where she specifically states she was released or is no longer employed, then that is a different story. I am going to put her back this time, but after this, I am not going to touch it. Thanks! Josborne2382 03:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to add that the reason Doppy88 used as to the proof of her release is that she said it on her website. Here is the only statement on her Myspace page (her only offical page), the one that wrestling sites are reporting:
I am sorry, but I don't see anywhere in that statement that she is no longer employed with the WWE. Honestly the only proof that I have been able to find is that her profile has been removed from wwe.com, but that doesn't mean anything. Do I think she was released? Yes, but I have no proof that she was. Does anyone? Thanks again! Josborne2382 04:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Her profile has been removed from wwe.com, i know her name has been removed from this article but i thought it may have just been someone who removed it without source seeing as it says she is currently employed on her article and her name isnt on the alumni page. Don.-.J 18:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
i think that she should stay on the roster until an official word is give from either wwe or her. SpeedyC1 21:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Although the dirt sheets aren't necessarily reliable for other things such as storylines, they are usually reliable for matters such as this, and we have actually used them as sources for this particular article in the past. Seeing as a precedent has been set that we allow the dirtsheets as sources for this article, and all of them are reporting she's been released, and people are posting comments on her myspace with their apologies and well wishes about her being released, I think it's safe to say we can confirm she's been released. What other proof is there? Wait 6 months and after she no longer appears on WWE or developmental programming? That's a little ridiculous. WWE.com is slow to take down entrance videos, as evidenced by the fact Marcus Cor Von's is still up there. Bmg916 Speak 13:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
To end the lame edit war. Please use the break to reach consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 18:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
SpeedyC1 and myself have worked together and reached a possible compromise regarding the Kristal Marshall situation. We agree that the way her article is now is fine, since it does not explicitly say she was released and is vague enough since her status is disputed here on the wiki. As for this article, we believe that the following can satisfy all sides until some sort of official announcement is made: We list Kristal under inactive talent, but with the description of employment status with the company (legit) unknown. until we get an official word from either her or WWE. Thoughts? Bmg916 Speak 19:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Doppy88 Go to the site you provided, it provides a link to her myspace page, that myspace page says it is her official myspace page and then states if you want to go to her official website to click the image, when you click the image it does NOT go back to the original site, It goes to a different site. Thus meaning if you truly believe the site you provided, then you believe the myspace page it provides, and if you believe the myspace page it proves the original one you provided is in fact NOT her OFFICIAL site. With that being said there is no proof which is real, so you can't believe any of them. Aladdin Zane 13:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Official website or not argument aside, we can't agree on whether we have confirmation she was released or not. This is why the above proposed compromise was brought to the table. I would like to request we comment on said compromise as opposed to whether or not she was released and whether or not we have proof. These arguments are exactly why the above compromise was put together by people on both sides of the argument. So, if we can, let's stick to commenting on that instead of continuing the arguments for definitely one side or the other, thanks! Bmg916 Speak 15:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
That's not how it is worded now, her name is not on the page at all. I think she should be listed under Smackdown/inactive talent: with current status unknown as the reason Aladdin Zane 16:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Should kelly,brooke and layla be added under ecw female wrestler seeing as they occasionally wrestle in diva battle royals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Noe DX are back together put them on tag team list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.103.232 ( talk) 06:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
If u read wwe.com properly u would have read dat DX is reuniting 4 one night only nxt week on raw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Unless they appear together on every show they shouldn't be added back, theres no gurentee they'll even come out to the DX music. Skitzo 10:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to know why Serena is not on the OVW roster under Female wrestlers because i know for a fact she is still in OVW cos she recently had a title match against OVW Women's Champion Roucka.Here's a link to her biopage http://www.ovwrestling.com/Superstars/Divas/serena.htm.
Unless she's under contract she doesn't belong on this page, OVW is not exclusive t people under WWE contract.
Skitzo 08:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Who is Mr Hollywood? i've never heard of him or seen him on raw.So y is he on the raw roster? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMorleyRoxs ( talk • contribs) 05:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
stop adding them as wrestlers they are not full time wrestlers so leave them in other on-sreen talent with the tag occasional wreslters. Skitzo 21:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Some people have noticed that the diva pages have been removed from wwe.com. No one can be sure why, maybe its some sort of glitch, or they have decided to redo all of the diva pages. But they are still employed by WWE so they should stay in this article. Don.-.J 00:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
The divas are probably off to remove Brooke and Kristal from the website WWEBoffin0101 16:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
They were already off before the rest came off. And this conversation is starting to get forum-like, so I am going to suggest we stop now. Bmg916 Speak 17:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
HORNSWOGGLE IS NO LONGER ON SMACKDOWN. WHEN HE ENTERS THE RING AND HIS NAME COMES UP, HE HAS A RAW SIGN NOW, NOT A SMACKDOWN ONE. GET HIM ON THE RAW ROSTER.
has anyone picked up the latest wwe magazine. there i a rumor going around that chris jehrico is on the cover.Bleek25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleek25 ( talk • contribs) 16:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
it has been confirmed he is on the cover, however until he appears on TV or ppv he still shouldn't be added. Skitzo 11:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
leave him off until he debuts, as we don't yet know which show he will be on.-- Skitzo ( talk) 18:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
we can assign him to unassigned talent. -- 24.191.218.83 ( talk) 20:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
There is actually no source that says anything about Jericho's status. Yes, the magazine suggests that he will be working for them, but has WWE/Jericho made an announcement saying he is definitely employed by WWE? No. Has he appeared on WWE television? No. Has WWE mentioned Jericho in its programming on television or online? No. Does any reliable source list him as being on the roster? No. -- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 09:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I added him to unassigned talent, both F4W and the Wrestling Observe have said he will debut either at Survivor Series or on the Following RAW, they would not of put him on the magazine if he were not under contract to them. Skitzo ( talk) 10:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Someone needs to add him to the roster page!
her reason for being inactive is changed on the roster everyday. we need to decide on what to put next to her name. i suggest "currently (kayfabe) suspended". other suggestions? Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 01:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
i assume nobody cares? then we'll just leave it at, "currently inactive" 24.191.218.83 ( talk) 11:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
it will stay inactive until she is able to appear in wwe live event again. besides, she's still under contract. 12.127.178.158 22:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
they had one match together, and are facing each other at armageddon so would we call them a tag team? NiciVampireHeart 16:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
there is absolutely no way to know when a superstar will return to the roster. please do not add a return date or time next to the inactive superstar's name. there is no way of knowing. the only thing that should be next to their name is the reason for being inactive. Hardyboyz27 12:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
She has not appered on WWE television in over a year and there is no source to confirm she is still employed by the WWE. Bencey ( talk) 23:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Sunny's got to be removed from the "Inactive Talent" section, cos she's not RETURNING as such on Monday Night, she's just making a guest appearance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Excessbaggage80 ( talk • contribs) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
since when has Teddy Long been demoted to Assistant GM? Vickie was HIS assistant then Acting-GM during his "heart attack" Skitzo ( talk) 19:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone should add him to the inactive talent because on the WWE website it says he was injured this past friday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.88.127.189 ( talk) 05:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Recently, Truco9311 has been adding a citation for everyone's being on the list. Is this really necessary? Hezekiah957 ( talk) 17:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
If that is what it takes then it is better off not a featured list. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes it most certaintly is a bad thing if it is done to an outrageous degree. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
the problem is developmental roster changes are often hard to verify, especially as some people won't accept the Wrestling Observer web site/newspaper as a source, yet it tends to be the most credible independent news source available. BTW who approved adding them? i certainly wasn't asked, they are not necessary for the article Skitzo ( talk) 18:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Fat Man: From the very beginning of that article: " All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation" The information you are providing references for is not challengeable, it is common knowledge. I see no one challenging something they can view on their TV every week and if you actually edited this article on a regular basis you would see no one comes here to challenge that information, such as if Triple H is indeed on the Raw roster. All of this is unneeded and simply clutters up the article. If you want to reference some of the developmental superstars with links verifying they have signed a contract go ahead, but what's been done so far is just ridiculous. I'm sure no one here that edits this article on a daily basis would want to sacrifice the look of the article for some "featured list" standing. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't think the choice should be in the hands of some project, but instead the editors of this article who work hard to keep it accurate every day. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
ROFL and what gives you that authority? I simply suggest we wait until the other editors of this article voice their opinion on this issue. Doppy88 ( talk) 18:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
this is a stupid idea. all it is doing is adding junk to an already good page
Davnel03 (
talk) 19:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Striking comment by indef blocked user.
Dav
nel
03 22:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
The little squares are not at every name, they are under the notes section. That looks fine to me. Doppy88 ( talk) 19:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
It's pointless to continue argueing right now. Every editor of this page please go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPT:PW#WWE_Roster to either agree or disagree on this change.
Doppy88 ( talk) 19:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
To just give my opinion on the ongoing debate, I say that putting the citation next to the superstars' names was a great idea. The idea of Wikipedia is to give everyone who views the site, the most information there is to know. By adding the links to their profiles, Wikipedia viewers can get a look at the superstar's character on their television program. The WWE profiles allow fans to see videos, pictures, and other features about the superstar that Wikipedia does not have to offer. I approve. Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 19:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
However, they can simply click the superstar's wiki article and then link to their WWE profile from there. Citations should not function as links for more information, that's what the article is for. Doppy88 ( talk) 19:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
As I do agree with that, I think that the citations make is a little bit easier for users if the link to the WWE profile is on the main roster's page. Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 19:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
100% agree with Truco9311. Just one question? Why are the citations not added to the ECW Superstars and the Raw Divas? Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 20:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
there is a link to the WWE roster page at the bottom it would be easy to add 1 for OVW and FCW as well, i don't see the need for a link to each person when they already have it in their individual articles, it's a good idea but not 1 that we need IMO, you could always link to the RAW, SmackDown and ECW rosters in the header on their sections. Skitzo ( talk) 21:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Why are two guys new to this trying to change the way thing are.This page was just fine before they came. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleek25 ( talk • contribs) 21:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Skitzouk, Bleek and any others, the only way to stop this is to vote here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPT:PW#WWE_Roster. They obviously think their project has more authority over us by holding the vote on their own page instead of on the page where the dispute is actually taking place. If you don't vote there they'll simply ignore us. Doppy88 ( talk) 21:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
it's not "their project", i too am a member of Project:Professional wrestling, tbh this issue is not something that i'm all that bothered about and will go along with the majority, however that doesn't change the fact i don't think its needed. Skitzo ( talk) 22:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
true but it does seem every so often some newbies turn up and make a fuss about nothing and in this case take it upon themselves to change something without getting consensus 1st. Skitzo ( talk) 23:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Why does it bring you to a Ric Flair page when you click on his son's name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennedyniles ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Because he isn't yet notible enough for his own article. Skitzo ( talk) 22:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
The wrestlers real names should not be on this page. This page should follow the rules of "kayfabe" and not mention the auctual names of the wrestlers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.250.188 ( talk) 21:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
no only that but wrestlers change name some times.if we didn't have their real name there would be alot of pages on wrestles ring names that are not used any more. Bleek25 ( talk) 18:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone added him back to the main raw roster, i moved him to inactive as he hasn't actually yet wrested on the show. Skitzo ( talk) 16:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
He has been moved back to the Smackdown section, as he has not officially been changed, by the WWE, to RAW. On WWE.com, he is still on the Smackdown roster. Michaelclarkc 18:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.216.2 ( talk)
he should be on the inactive. wwe.com has 2 articles about his return to the ring on the raw brand S-PAC 54 04:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Who keeps putting JBL on RAW? At this moment, he is still on the Smackdown page on WWE.com. Until WWE.com put his profile on RAW, he is still a Smackdown superstar. The same goes for Tazz. He filled in for JBL this week on Smackdown, but that won't air until tomorrow night, therefore Tazz is still on ECW. Michaelclarkc 18:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelclarkc ( talk • contribs)
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! Whoever is constantly putting JBL on RAW & Tazz on Smackdown.....QUIT IT! On WWE.com JBL is still on Smackdown, and will remain there until the WWE officially put him on the RAW roster. The same goes for Tazz. Tazz appearing on Smackdown happens on Smackdown tonight, but it hasn't aired on TV yet, and it could have been for one night only. So once again, STOP CHANGING IT UNTIL WWE MAKE IT OFFICIAL! Michaelclarkc 17:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC) ( talk)
I Think this...
...should be listed. thoughts?-- 72.186.88.137 ( talk) 01:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The above is the full stable. They should be listed as so in the tag teams / stables section. does anyone have anything wrong with that? Hardyboyz27 ( talk) 02:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe this is long overdue, but there are a handful of talents listed on this page whose status is a bit questionable or has been stagnant for a lengthy period of time. These people include: Matt Capotelli, Chris Rombola, Mike DiBiase, Eddie Colon, Mariusz Puczko, and Beaulah McGillicutty. I think maybe we should try to investigate the status of these talents, since nobody has been able to find reports that they are, in fact, no longer with the company as of this point. Does anyone agree? Dahumorist ( talk) 17:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I e-mailed the webmaster of the UPW site asking about Puczko, so hopefully he'll get back to me soon with some info. Dahumorist ( talk) 17:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
The article should not list the team of Carlito and Santino as Cantino. That is the shorter name, but they do not announce the team as Cantino, just like they don't announce London and Kendrick as Londrick, it's just easier to type. If Carlito/Marella was listed Cantino, then London/Kendrick should be listed Londrick. But since thats not what WWE announces them as, we can't use those names. iMatthew ( talk) 12:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
according to wwe.com lance cade has received a shoulder injury at raws live event in atlanta georgia on friday night —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.164.143 ( talk) 18:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Isn't McIntire on Smackdown? What is he doing on the RAW page? Baseball16 ( talk) 17:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I read Drew McIntre was moving to raw on Lords Of Pain But Because he is still on the Smackdown page on WWE.com he should remain on smackdown until it is cofirmed by WWE. If he does move to raw does that mean Dave Taylor will move too?
Jimmy1994(UTC)
I read in a smackdown show report that Jonathan Coachman was announced as the replacement for JBL on the show, which will air on friday by Vickie Guerrerro as the new colour commentator alongside Michael Cole on Smackdown. Should we add him to the smackdown roster page. or wait untill the show is on. Jimmy1994(UTC)
funny but unacicary —Preceding unsigned comment added by The real rj ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
there seems to be a small dispute over his roster status, I just checked WWE.com and he remains on the smackdown roster page, so I think that for now we should leave him on there. Skitzo ( talk) 18:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Chavo Guerrerro is still a smackdown wrestler and only wrestles on ECW because of the talent exchange and as far as I know there is no plans for him to move to ECW. 172.143.6.44 ( talk) 21:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Why has Jonathan coachman been moved from Raw to Smackdown. Most people including me know that he is moving to be colour commentator on Smackdown but that has not been confirmed by WWE and is therefore a spoiler. Once the show airs on friday then he should be added to smackdown but until then he should still be on the Raw roster. 172.143.6.44 ( talk) 21:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone should move Ashley Massaro to the inactive roster on RAW because it states on her fansite, [4] that she redeuted at a RAW houseshow and will permantly be moved to RAW. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.105.237 ( talk) 07:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)