![]() | Falco Lombardi was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Star Fox characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Apparently, Caluroso translates to hot, warm, enthusiastic, or energetic in Spanish. I dunno why they have to change it to English, but it fits Panther well. XD—Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.85.202 ( talk) 01:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Where's Leons picture? It has dissapeared!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.69.210.3 ( talk) 18:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Hmm it looks like the kanjis for the three members are missing. I thought they can be found in the Japanese sites?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.97.46 ( talk) 17:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I was told to see the talk page about this issue, but it appears there's no discussion about it. I think it should be listed as Caruso, since that is the most recent version of his name. If someone doesn't dispute this in the next little while, I'll change it. 199.126.137.209 05:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I see in the to-do list that it states the stub-inclusion of articles on all the main characters here, as well as links to the individual character pages, but now it appears as though the character pages have been changed into redirect pages, with far less information in the sections here as well. For example: The information on Falco's name source and his rivalry with Leon were both lost in the transition, and have not since been recovered or reimplemented. Is this the final form, or are things still being moved? Just worried since there was no discussion of this on Falco's talk page. -- Blinkstale 04:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree 100%, individual pages are very convenient if you are listing characters from a franchise with so many characters at least you can have a picture of each one without looking over illustrated, this must be disscused futher- Dark Dragon Flame 05:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems to me that most people here agree that we need individual pages, myself included. If it is close to unanimously agreed then why not do it? I would think majority rules... Just putting it out there. I would be more than happy to help contribute to the new pages. Joeseph Robert ( talk) 23:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
why does going to that page redirect to here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.204.29 ( talk • contribs)
Do a Barrel Role is redirected to here because it is a trademark line for Peppy Hare dating back to the original Starwing on the SNES Guess who i am 08:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Actually, a barrel roll is not exclusive to Star Fox. It's an aircraft maneuver term.
It looks like a four year old wrote it. And wrote it poorly for a four year old at that. Gah.
It seems that someone keeps adding unnecessary images on this page. I added some info on a few sections yesterday and they downright removed it. There is also an issue dealing with speculation in Wolf's section, something about his "eyepatch" or whatever it is being a "targeting system". Any suggestions? -- AgreeneyedFox 19:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I reverted it back a few versions, I'm not sure if that deleted some of your info, if it did i'm sorry I had to do it because there were sings of vandalism, someone is removing images of important characters like James McCloud and adding images of non-important secondary characters at the bottom of the page, speculations and stuff it's not rare in this page either see Tricky for example- Dark Dragon Flame 00:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Honest to goodness, do any of you guys realize just how popular Krystal is? She needs to have her own article back!!! Just look at Fanfiction.net or [ Fanart Central]; Krystal has a small legion of devoted fans. I'm not exactly one of them, but I feel like the fanbase justifies giving Krystal her own article back. I've been trying to do that, but, so far, I've only succeeded in starting an edit war. See the talk page for the details. -- Luigifan 20:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
She might not need it now but as soon as another game comes out it's definetily going to be needed- Dark Dragon Flame 07:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, there's no reason to split Krystal or any other character out of this list unless there's commentary in reliable sources independent of the fictional works in which they appear. Seriously. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire | past ops) 23:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I think that Krystal's long and interesting development history (including her place in Dinosaur Planet), warrants an article for her. She is definitely as significant as any Star Fox character or item that has its own article (like Star Wolf (Star Fox)). She should get her article back. Rhindle The Red 10:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
AGREE She is one of the most important Chracters in the Star Fox universe, ther is NO reason NOT to have an article about her. Artanis-EN 21:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Please,give the above listed characters their articles back, I can think of a lot of Categories they would fit in to.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 ( talk • contribs)
You got my vote it was just plum bitter that way and what happend to there height,weight and age they use to have that
I agree to an extent, but not each character having individual articles for themselves (with the possible exceptions of Fox and Andross), but more like a team article, ie A whole page about the Starfox Team. That way more information could be gathered without making the article as a whole as spacious as the character atricle could be if the same instance was applied. Because, each character had quite interesting information regarding them (which were verified), which the character article does not include or loosely mentions. that makes the sections for each character incomplete, up to recent events anyway. For example, Andross' article has one small note that he appeared in Star Foz Command in that he appears piloting a Bio weapon. The whole point of his appearance is left completely left out (his reason for being there for example), and even the fact that there was a fake Andross in Star Fox 64. A similarly used concept was used for the Cult of Skaro article for Doctor Who, which is a character article about The cult as a whole, and included much more information about each member, more information than what is stated for the character article we have here, and most of the characters in this article have made many more appearances then the Cult of Skaro havein Doctor Who. Seriously, more information is necessary for the characters, and the most effective way is to grant each character, or whole team (Star Fox, and Star Wolf) an article. In fact more could then be said about the villains associates (such as the bosses in Star Fox 64) in their respective articles as well (all the bosses having a brief description in the Andross article as his associates), in much the same their would be articles for each team, so that each article would be equally about more then one character associated with a group of team. The First Darklord ( talk) 23:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I think the above character should have their own articles, there are so many Categories they would fit into. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 ( talk • contribs)
Seriously, the guy needs his own article. He has just as much info as Fox does, we will be able to get a clearer image of his personality, and I hear a big rumor that he might appear in the next Star Fox game and Super Smash Bros. Brawl as a playable character.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.175.119 ( talk • contribs)
the above characters should have their articles back, I can think of a lot of categories they would fit into. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.115 ( talk) 17:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
Yeah, General Scales too!
There is this cool web comic out called The AGENCY. This has quite a bit of different animated characters from different universes, and some of the characters are from Star Fox! Maybe we could create a Wikipedia page about this web comic; You guys have to read it first, though (I've already read through it all) at the point I've written this). To read the comic, look for JediAnn Solo on Drunk Duck Webcomics. Add to this section if you are ready to create a new page! Dragonstar4 8:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
For fact I can confirm Falco's voice actor to be Bill Johns, he is listed in the credits, but no name assigned. If more evidence is needed I will get it, as he is my brother's drama teacher. As for the other characters, I cannot provide evidence. When I try to add Bill Johns as a voice actor it just gets deleted.
His article sounds a bit unjust for him, so I edited it to be fair in his case (i.e. his breaking of the stereotype in Command). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.83.13.16 ( talk) 16:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
Seriously, Krystal is a rather popular character, and I feel that she should have her own article back. For instance, she's the most popular StarFox character on Fanart Central. -- Luigifan 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
'That's not enough justification.
He speaks normally in other languages in Command - it's only his English version that sounds weird. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.2.116.244 ( talk) 08:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC).
I mean, why not? Captain Shears is a star fox character (even if it was from the Star Fox Adventures Prequel Manga, he is still a star fox character nonetheless), and he served as the antagonist who was trying to revive Andross from the grave. I mean, if you were able to add a Starfox SNES comic-only character (Fara Phoenix) into this article, then you can sure as heck add Captain Shears to this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.32.182.50 ( talk) 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC).
Through google I found the Japanese Star Fox Assault site, but everyone's names are in the form of images. If anyone can type them out we could put them in the article. Also here's the Japanese Command site, I don't have time to explore it right now. Takuthehedgehog 15:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
According to the original Japanese manual for Star Fox 64 (translation available at IGN), Andross set up a trap for James "in which he did not survive". This very explicitly states that James died, and nothing vague like 'his fate' or such like (which is probably a way of censorship and making less references to death). And as for him being a playable character in Command, realize that no one except Fox felt his presence, just like in Star Fox 64. Obviously there is a spiritual connection between them. To say now that James is alive is just trying to be idealistic. 208.101.136.230 23:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I think he's dead since he only appears for Fox and he's the only one who can see/hear him. Then again, you never know. Son of Jadoja 20:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't Falco's appearence in Super Smash Brothers Melee make him able to qualify for an article? He's the only Melee character that doesn't have one. Simply MP 20:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleted?
Should they be added to each character?
Image:Dashstarfox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:James Command.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:EmperorAnglar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Amandastarfox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Fox does not have any real world information at the moment, and I cannot imagine there being more than a paragraph of it available. It needs to be merged because of that. TTN ( talk) 00:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Fox's article does not need to be merged. It has enough information to remain an article by itself. -- AgreeneyedFox ( talk) 02:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
No Merge. As the lead character in a popular series, as well as having made many appearances in other games and in other media, he needs his own article for proper encyclopedic treatment. Rhindle The Red ( talk) 15:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Merge - Fox McCloud does not need a page on Wikipedia, especially because it has no real-life data. I'd prefer it being deleted and transwikied to a Wikia instead. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 18:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Merge - TTN is right in this case, and suggesting a merge is an appropriate action to deal with articles that fail to meet notability requirements particularly for fictional articles. Just because he's the lead character in a long running series does not make him notable (per WP's definition), that only makes him important but that's not enough to qualify the character article. Merge overall details into List article, transwiki the rest. -- MASEM 01:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
(un-indent) There needs to be something to decide if a character needs an article or not. The only way is the amount of possible real world information. This has three sentences, and I cannot see the possibility for more at this point. I don't know if you can, but you'll have to back that assertion. TTN 20:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Fox has plenty of potential for "real world" info. For example, many reviewers of Star Fox Adventures criticized the game for having Fox out of place, and if I can remember correctly, I believe it was IGN that said something along the lines of "Fox is only on this world at Nintendo's request, not because he belongs." A reviewer of Command noted that "Fox is finally back in the Arwing, where he belongs." I also recall an entry in Craig Harris' blog on IGN Wii that was called "F--ed up Fox" where he rambled on and on about how Nintendo couldn't solidify what the Star Fox franchise was, and plenty of his own opinions concerning Fox, namely his character models. Here's the link [1] -- AgreeneyedFox 23:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
There's an interview in N-gamer which has lots of real world information. [2]. -- Nydas (Talk) 18:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Or are they not even notable enough for that? Come on, people! 153.42.168.174 ( talk) 22:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
There is still nothing that warrants separation from the article. In creation, the first paragraph is filler (it's about the series). The second fits in the general concept and creation. The basis for Fox fits in here just fine, though the part about the scarf will have to be removed, unless I'm missing a mention of it. The part about being based off of Miyamoto's personality also fits into the general creation, as it goes with the mention of the other character's personalities. The rest of the minor notes throughout the article can also be placed here as well. TTN ( talk) 18:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone think that Star Wolf's hideout in Assault (Sargasso Sea Space) is a reference to the novel Wide Sargasso Sea and its various media adaptations? ChromeWulf ZX ( talk) 04:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Fara Phoenix redirects here, but she's nowhere to be found in this article. - furrykef ( Talk at me) 21:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I'd hit it myself, but I'm at 2RR and would like to stay that way. Can someone else please take care of this? Coreycubed ( talk) 16:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/wolfoxokamichan/trophy2.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/wolfoxokamichan/trophy.jpg
taunt: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gNXQzmmafQA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.128.25 ( talk) 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
someone edited general peppers article. and he used star pex. i edited it back. but why did he do that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.186.33 ( talk) 00:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Here's the vid. http://youtube.com/watch?v=arRHChWh5tk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.112.210 ( talk) 11:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Is there any proof to this?
Yeah--his trophy, and the special dialogue on the Lylat Cruise stage. 74.14.11.169 ( talk) 02:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I remember when I was a kid when our neighbor gave me all of his old Nintendo Power magazines. There was an interview with one of the creators of Star Fox 64. One question I thought odd was 'Is there any character you dislike,' to which was answered, 'Well, I really hated the English version of Bill's voice.' However, another question asked was, 'We're all curious, while other character's names have fairly obvious connotations, "Pigma Dengar's" last name doesn't mean anything in English. Any comments?' 'Well, that's actually a pun on a Japanese word which means (he said something like, 'to go against,' or, 'to betray'), and is sort of an inside joke with us.'
Anyway, I have long since thrown those issues away. If anyone has a NP stash around there house, that's where you can find the citation. I don't remember which issue it was, but I think it will have "Interview with creator, etc" on it. Sorry. :? ~TJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.117.184 ( talk) 22:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Just where exactly is the source for Slippy's gender?-- Herb-Sewell ( talk) 20:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Slippy has a girlfriend -_- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.237.148 ( talk) 01:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC) That That doesn't actually confirm that the engagement can't be one between two homosexuals. Until there's an actual verifiable source, Slippy's gender remains ambiguous.-- Herb-Sewell ( talk) 04:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Here's the script of Ending 5 from SF Command.
"The years passed. Slippy and Amanda had a veritable army of children, and Slippy thought he could never be any happier. His children grew tall and strong in the clean Aquas air, and loved to hear stories of how Dad flew with the legendary Star Fox team.
Slippy decided to leave Star Fox behind and make a new life of the beautiful Planet of Aquas...with Amanda by his side. There was no indecision or regret on his part. He would live for his family now...
Several decades pass. Slippy is now an old man who loves to recount tales of the good old days for visiting children. When he finishes a yarn, he often thinks on his friends. Do they still cross the galaxy righting wrongs? He can only watch the sky and wonder..."
Slippy is male. GET THE HELL OVER IT. 70.48.216.109 ( talk) 11:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
O.K., see, that's there a proper source.-- Herb-Sewell ( talk) 17:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Over a decade later: In the official Chinese localisation of Star Fox 64, Slippy is referred to as '她' (she) in the manual. Jhynjhiruu ( talk) 10:38, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I am pretty sure only Slippy, Fox and Krystal are the ones who are voiced by their Assault VA. As you check this vid, you can see that Wolf, Panther, Leon, Falco, and Peppy didn't have their Assault voice actors credited (that, and they actually sound different). Any idea who voiced them in Brawl? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.126.98 ( talk) 10:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, I don't know. Falco does sound like Mike Maddeoy to me, and I've heard rumors that Grant Goodeve (Assault VA) is still Wolf, and I did see Dex Manley (ROB 64 in Assault) in the credits when I finished SSE. Either the Assault VAs were replaced, there were scheduling conflicts, or they're uncredited/under psuedonyms. ChromeWulf ZX ( talk) 20:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I have a feeling that they are credited, but the problem is that SSE Credits didn't specify who voiced who. Wolf sounds different here when compared to his Assault voice, and Dex voiced someone else here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.124.202 ( talk) 04:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Wolf does indeed sound a lot like Engineer and Assault Wolf (the gruffness on the voice).
In Star Fox Assault, you can hint that Falco there has an accent similar to the one in Brawl.
Is it possible that the two are not credited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wuffiekun123 ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Where does it say that the real ending the the one where Krystal changes her identity and migrates to a new planet? I believe Starfox Command has no true ending, and if Nintendo says there is, then it's most likely Ending 1 because it's a combination of Endings 5, 6, and 7. Joey368 ( talk) 22:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, endings 1, 2 and 5 seem to be the ones most likely to be chosen as possible canon endings. The default ending is one of the farthest you can get from what should be canon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.55.0.102 ( talk) 18:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
How can Wolf be voiced by Jay Ward if he's dead? -- Coconutfred73 ( talk) 15:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Do we really need the long list of outfits that Krystal wears in each game? It's not notable (and i don't just mean in the real world; even in the Star Fox universe I don't see how it's notable), and it's more specific information than we are giving in the article for any other character, including Fox, which makes the article look awkward. I am deleting that list for now; if someone wants to bring it back, could you please explain here why you think it's important to have that section? Thanks. -- Politizer ( talk) 23:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you are removing Image:Star Fox Brawl.jpg from the lead-in of the article? So far, you have not left any edit summaries or discussed your edits so none of us can tell what your rationale is.
Furthermore, regarding your additions of Image:Falco Command.jpg and Image:Wolf O'Donnell.jpg...I don't have a problem with having those images there, but if we are adding images of them and removing one of the few images that actually has Fox in it, won't we risk facing issues of undue weight? Please expain below. -- Politizer ( talk) 15:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed the extra whitespace added in this edit and I figured I should explain why here, to avoid any revert wars. I can see why you added that whitespace--so that the beginning of Fox's entry would line up against the left margin, instead of being indented by the image. But I think having that large amount of whitespace (as you can see if in the old edit) is probably not visually pleasing (I don't know if there is an official WP policy on this), and guessed that having the beginning of the Fox entry offset a bit by the image is not as bad as having all that whitespace.
Alternatives to this would be putting the image in question (the image of the Star Fox team) on the right-hand side of the article; that isn't really a good alternative here, though, because there are already two images close together on the right side (the image in the lead-in, and the image of Falco not long after), and squishing this image in between them is also not aesthetically pleasing. One could remove the lead-in image and put this Star Fox team image in the lead-in instead (after all, the lead-in image is from Brawl, not from a Star Fox game); the only problem with that is that this image is very small, and also doesn't look good in the lead-in (trust me, I tried it and it didn't look good).
The best solution is probably just to come up with a better image, put it in the lead-in, and scrap both this and the Brawl image. In the meantime, though, I have put the image where it is because this seems to be the most aesthetically pleasing layout, given the materials we have to work with. -- Politizer ( talk) 19:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Despite Star Fox 2 not being an officially released game, but still nonetheless very real, should Fay Spaniel and Miyu Lynx perhaps have honorable mentions? There might not be very much to put, however, since little can be established of their characters aside from animated gestures and translated dialogue... ProjectPlatinum 00:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
The article really doesn't have anything going for it besides some creation information, so it would be best to merge it her in order to strengthen this article. TTN ( talk) 01:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Why does the article state that Wolf's change in design (from 64 to Assault onward) is "... due to the fact that he got into more serious criminal manners and therefore has a bounty on his head." ?? What would entail such an impression? ( 67.58.249.220 ( talk) 05:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC))
WHY? >_< ( 66.116.4.100 ( talk) 06:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC))
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Caiman (Star Fox). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 15#Caiman (Star Fox) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards,
SONIC
678
07:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The redirect
Slippy has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Slippy until a consensus is reached.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
15:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Vixy Reinard has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Vixy Reinard until a consensus is reached.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
15:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
As a result of
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22#Vixy Reinard, here are the contributions of the article formerly at
Vixy Reinard. --
Tavix (
talk)
22:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
|
---|
|
The redirect
List of minor characters in the Star Fox series has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § List of minor characters in the Star Fox series until a consensus is reached.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
15:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Falco Lombardi was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Star Fox characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Apparently, Caluroso translates to hot, warm, enthusiastic, or energetic in Spanish. I dunno why they have to change it to English, but it fits Panther well. XD—Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.85.202 ( talk) 01:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Where's Leons picture? It has dissapeared!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.69.210.3 ( talk) 18:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Hmm it looks like the kanjis for the three members are missing. I thought they can be found in the Japanese sites?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.97.46 ( talk) 17:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I was told to see the talk page about this issue, but it appears there's no discussion about it. I think it should be listed as Caruso, since that is the most recent version of his name. If someone doesn't dispute this in the next little while, I'll change it. 199.126.137.209 05:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I see in the to-do list that it states the stub-inclusion of articles on all the main characters here, as well as links to the individual character pages, but now it appears as though the character pages have been changed into redirect pages, with far less information in the sections here as well. For example: The information on Falco's name source and his rivalry with Leon were both lost in the transition, and have not since been recovered or reimplemented. Is this the final form, or are things still being moved? Just worried since there was no discussion of this on Falco's talk page. -- Blinkstale 04:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree 100%, individual pages are very convenient if you are listing characters from a franchise with so many characters at least you can have a picture of each one without looking over illustrated, this must be disscused futher- Dark Dragon Flame 05:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems to me that most people here agree that we need individual pages, myself included. If it is close to unanimously agreed then why not do it? I would think majority rules... Just putting it out there. I would be more than happy to help contribute to the new pages. Joeseph Robert ( talk) 23:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
why does going to that page redirect to here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.204.29 ( talk • contribs)
Do a Barrel Role is redirected to here because it is a trademark line for Peppy Hare dating back to the original Starwing on the SNES Guess who i am 08:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Actually, a barrel roll is not exclusive to Star Fox. It's an aircraft maneuver term.
It looks like a four year old wrote it. And wrote it poorly for a four year old at that. Gah.
It seems that someone keeps adding unnecessary images on this page. I added some info on a few sections yesterday and they downright removed it. There is also an issue dealing with speculation in Wolf's section, something about his "eyepatch" or whatever it is being a "targeting system". Any suggestions? -- AgreeneyedFox 19:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I reverted it back a few versions, I'm not sure if that deleted some of your info, if it did i'm sorry I had to do it because there were sings of vandalism, someone is removing images of important characters like James McCloud and adding images of non-important secondary characters at the bottom of the page, speculations and stuff it's not rare in this page either see Tricky for example- Dark Dragon Flame 00:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Honest to goodness, do any of you guys realize just how popular Krystal is? She needs to have her own article back!!! Just look at Fanfiction.net or [ Fanart Central]; Krystal has a small legion of devoted fans. I'm not exactly one of them, but I feel like the fanbase justifies giving Krystal her own article back. I've been trying to do that, but, so far, I've only succeeded in starting an edit war. See the talk page for the details. -- Luigifan 20:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
She might not need it now but as soon as another game comes out it's definetily going to be needed- Dark Dragon Flame 07:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, there's no reason to split Krystal or any other character out of this list unless there's commentary in reliable sources independent of the fictional works in which they appear. Seriously. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire | past ops) 23:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
I think that Krystal's long and interesting development history (including her place in Dinosaur Planet), warrants an article for her. She is definitely as significant as any Star Fox character or item that has its own article (like Star Wolf (Star Fox)). She should get her article back. Rhindle The Red 10:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
AGREE She is one of the most important Chracters in the Star Fox universe, ther is NO reason NOT to have an article about her. Artanis-EN 21:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Please,give the above listed characters their articles back, I can think of a lot of Categories they would fit in to.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 ( talk • contribs)
You got my vote it was just plum bitter that way and what happend to there height,weight and age they use to have that
I agree to an extent, but not each character having individual articles for themselves (with the possible exceptions of Fox and Andross), but more like a team article, ie A whole page about the Starfox Team. That way more information could be gathered without making the article as a whole as spacious as the character atricle could be if the same instance was applied. Because, each character had quite interesting information regarding them (which were verified), which the character article does not include or loosely mentions. that makes the sections for each character incomplete, up to recent events anyway. For example, Andross' article has one small note that he appeared in Star Foz Command in that he appears piloting a Bio weapon. The whole point of his appearance is left completely left out (his reason for being there for example), and even the fact that there was a fake Andross in Star Fox 64. A similarly used concept was used for the Cult of Skaro article for Doctor Who, which is a character article about The cult as a whole, and included much more information about each member, more information than what is stated for the character article we have here, and most of the characters in this article have made many more appearances then the Cult of Skaro havein Doctor Who. Seriously, more information is necessary for the characters, and the most effective way is to grant each character, or whole team (Star Fox, and Star Wolf) an article. In fact more could then be said about the villains associates (such as the bosses in Star Fox 64) in their respective articles as well (all the bosses having a brief description in the Andross article as his associates), in much the same their would be articles for each team, so that each article would be equally about more then one character associated with a group of team. The First Darklord ( talk) 23:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I think the above character should have their own articles, there are so many Categories they would fit into. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 ( talk • contribs)
Seriously, the guy needs his own article. He has just as much info as Fox does, we will be able to get a clearer image of his personality, and I hear a big rumor that he might appear in the next Star Fox game and Super Smash Bros. Brawl as a playable character.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.175.119 ( talk • contribs)
the above characters should have their articles back, I can think of a lot of categories they would fit into. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.115 ( talk) 17:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
Yeah, General Scales too!
There is this cool web comic out called The AGENCY. This has quite a bit of different animated characters from different universes, and some of the characters are from Star Fox! Maybe we could create a Wikipedia page about this web comic; You guys have to read it first, though (I've already read through it all) at the point I've written this). To read the comic, look for JediAnn Solo on Drunk Duck Webcomics. Add to this section if you are ready to create a new page! Dragonstar4 8:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
For fact I can confirm Falco's voice actor to be Bill Johns, he is listed in the credits, but no name assigned. If more evidence is needed I will get it, as he is my brother's drama teacher. As for the other characters, I cannot provide evidence. When I try to add Bill Johns as a voice actor it just gets deleted.
His article sounds a bit unjust for him, so I edited it to be fair in his case (i.e. his breaking of the stereotype in Command). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.83.13.16 ( talk) 16:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
Seriously, Krystal is a rather popular character, and I feel that she should have her own article back. For instance, she's the most popular StarFox character on Fanart Central. -- Luigifan 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
'That's not enough justification.
He speaks normally in other languages in Command - it's only his English version that sounds weird. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.2.116.244 ( talk) 08:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC).
I mean, why not? Captain Shears is a star fox character (even if it was from the Star Fox Adventures Prequel Manga, he is still a star fox character nonetheless), and he served as the antagonist who was trying to revive Andross from the grave. I mean, if you were able to add a Starfox SNES comic-only character (Fara Phoenix) into this article, then you can sure as heck add Captain Shears to this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.32.182.50 ( talk) 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC).
Through google I found the Japanese Star Fox Assault site, but everyone's names are in the form of images. If anyone can type them out we could put them in the article. Also here's the Japanese Command site, I don't have time to explore it right now. Takuthehedgehog 15:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
According to the original Japanese manual for Star Fox 64 (translation available at IGN), Andross set up a trap for James "in which he did not survive". This very explicitly states that James died, and nothing vague like 'his fate' or such like (which is probably a way of censorship and making less references to death). And as for him being a playable character in Command, realize that no one except Fox felt his presence, just like in Star Fox 64. Obviously there is a spiritual connection between them. To say now that James is alive is just trying to be idealistic. 208.101.136.230 23:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I think he's dead since he only appears for Fox and he's the only one who can see/hear him. Then again, you never know. Son of Jadoja 20:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't Falco's appearence in Super Smash Brothers Melee make him able to qualify for an article? He's the only Melee character that doesn't have one. Simply MP 20:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleted?
Should they be added to each character?
Image:Dashstarfox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:James Command.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:EmperorAnglar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Amandastarfox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Fox does not have any real world information at the moment, and I cannot imagine there being more than a paragraph of it available. It needs to be merged because of that. TTN ( talk) 00:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Fox's article does not need to be merged. It has enough information to remain an article by itself. -- AgreeneyedFox ( talk) 02:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
No Merge. As the lead character in a popular series, as well as having made many appearances in other games and in other media, he needs his own article for proper encyclopedic treatment. Rhindle The Red ( talk) 15:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Merge - Fox McCloud does not need a page on Wikipedia, especially because it has no real-life data. I'd prefer it being deleted and transwikied to a Wikia instead. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 18:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Merge - TTN is right in this case, and suggesting a merge is an appropriate action to deal with articles that fail to meet notability requirements particularly for fictional articles. Just because he's the lead character in a long running series does not make him notable (per WP's definition), that only makes him important but that's not enough to qualify the character article. Merge overall details into List article, transwiki the rest. -- MASEM 01:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
(un-indent) There needs to be something to decide if a character needs an article or not. The only way is the amount of possible real world information. This has three sentences, and I cannot see the possibility for more at this point. I don't know if you can, but you'll have to back that assertion. TTN 20:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Fox has plenty of potential for "real world" info. For example, many reviewers of Star Fox Adventures criticized the game for having Fox out of place, and if I can remember correctly, I believe it was IGN that said something along the lines of "Fox is only on this world at Nintendo's request, not because he belongs." A reviewer of Command noted that "Fox is finally back in the Arwing, where he belongs." I also recall an entry in Craig Harris' blog on IGN Wii that was called "F--ed up Fox" where he rambled on and on about how Nintendo couldn't solidify what the Star Fox franchise was, and plenty of his own opinions concerning Fox, namely his character models. Here's the link [1] -- AgreeneyedFox 23:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
There's an interview in N-gamer which has lots of real world information. [2]. -- Nydas (Talk) 18:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Or are they not even notable enough for that? Come on, people! 153.42.168.174 ( talk) 22:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
There is still nothing that warrants separation from the article. In creation, the first paragraph is filler (it's about the series). The second fits in the general concept and creation. The basis for Fox fits in here just fine, though the part about the scarf will have to be removed, unless I'm missing a mention of it. The part about being based off of Miyamoto's personality also fits into the general creation, as it goes with the mention of the other character's personalities. The rest of the minor notes throughout the article can also be placed here as well. TTN ( talk) 18:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone think that Star Wolf's hideout in Assault (Sargasso Sea Space) is a reference to the novel Wide Sargasso Sea and its various media adaptations? ChromeWulf ZX ( talk) 04:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Fara Phoenix redirects here, but she's nowhere to be found in this article. - furrykef ( Talk at me) 21:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I'd hit it myself, but I'm at 2RR and would like to stay that way. Can someone else please take care of this? Coreycubed ( talk) 16:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/wolfoxokamichan/trophy2.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/wolfoxokamichan/trophy.jpg
taunt: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gNXQzmmafQA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.128.25 ( talk) 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
someone edited general peppers article. and he used star pex. i edited it back. but why did he do that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.186.33 ( talk) 00:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Here's the vid. http://youtube.com/watch?v=arRHChWh5tk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.112.210 ( talk) 11:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Is there any proof to this?
Yeah--his trophy, and the special dialogue on the Lylat Cruise stage. 74.14.11.169 ( talk) 02:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I remember when I was a kid when our neighbor gave me all of his old Nintendo Power magazines. There was an interview with one of the creators of Star Fox 64. One question I thought odd was 'Is there any character you dislike,' to which was answered, 'Well, I really hated the English version of Bill's voice.' However, another question asked was, 'We're all curious, while other character's names have fairly obvious connotations, "Pigma Dengar's" last name doesn't mean anything in English. Any comments?' 'Well, that's actually a pun on a Japanese word which means (he said something like, 'to go against,' or, 'to betray'), and is sort of an inside joke with us.'
Anyway, I have long since thrown those issues away. If anyone has a NP stash around there house, that's where you can find the citation. I don't remember which issue it was, but I think it will have "Interview with creator, etc" on it. Sorry. :? ~TJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.117.184 ( talk) 22:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Just where exactly is the source for Slippy's gender?-- Herb-Sewell ( talk) 20:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Slippy has a girlfriend -_- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.237.148 ( talk) 01:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC) That That doesn't actually confirm that the engagement can't be one between two homosexuals. Until there's an actual verifiable source, Slippy's gender remains ambiguous.-- Herb-Sewell ( talk) 04:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Here's the script of Ending 5 from SF Command.
"The years passed. Slippy and Amanda had a veritable army of children, and Slippy thought he could never be any happier. His children grew tall and strong in the clean Aquas air, and loved to hear stories of how Dad flew with the legendary Star Fox team.
Slippy decided to leave Star Fox behind and make a new life of the beautiful Planet of Aquas...with Amanda by his side. There was no indecision or regret on his part. He would live for his family now...
Several decades pass. Slippy is now an old man who loves to recount tales of the good old days for visiting children. When he finishes a yarn, he often thinks on his friends. Do they still cross the galaxy righting wrongs? He can only watch the sky and wonder..."
Slippy is male. GET THE HELL OVER IT. 70.48.216.109 ( talk) 11:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
O.K., see, that's there a proper source.-- Herb-Sewell ( talk) 17:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Over a decade later: In the official Chinese localisation of Star Fox 64, Slippy is referred to as '她' (she) in the manual. Jhynjhiruu ( talk) 10:38, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
I am pretty sure only Slippy, Fox and Krystal are the ones who are voiced by their Assault VA. As you check this vid, you can see that Wolf, Panther, Leon, Falco, and Peppy didn't have their Assault voice actors credited (that, and they actually sound different). Any idea who voiced them in Brawl? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.126.98 ( talk) 10:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, I don't know. Falco does sound like Mike Maddeoy to me, and I've heard rumors that Grant Goodeve (Assault VA) is still Wolf, and I did see Dex Manley (ROB 64 in Assault) in the credits when I finished SSE. Either the Assault VAs were replaced, there were scheduling conflicts, or they're uncredited/under psuedonyms. ChromeWulf ZX ( talk) 20:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I have a feeling that they are credited, but the problem is that SSE Credits didn't specify who voiced who. Wolf sounds different here when compared to his Assault voice, and Dex voiced someone else here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.124.202 ( talk) 04:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Wolf does indeed sound a lot like Engineer and Assault Wolf (the gruffness on the voice).
In Star Fox Assault, you can hint that Falco there has an accent similar to the one in Brawl.
Is it possible that the two are not credited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wuffiekun123 ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Where does it say that the real ending the the one where Krystal changes her identity and migrates to a new planet? I believe Starfox Command has no true ending, and if Nintendo says there is, then it's most likely Ending 1 because it's a combination of Endings 5, 6, and 7. Joey368 ( talk) 22:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, endings 1, 2 and 5 seem to be the ones most likely to be chosen as possible canon endings. The default ending is one of the farthest you can get from what should be canon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.55.0.102 ( talk) 18:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
How can Wolf be voiced by Jay Ward if he's dead? -- Coconutfred73 ( talk) 15:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Do we really need the long list of outfits that Krystal wears in each game? It's not notable (and i don't just mean in the real world; even in the Star Fox universe I don't see how it's notable), and it's more specific information than we are giving in the article for any other character, including Fox, which makes the article look awkward. I am deleting that list for now; if someone wants to bring it back, could you please explain here why you think it's important to have that section? Thanks. -- Politizer ( talk) 23:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you are removing Image:Star Fox Brawl.jpg from the lead-in of the article? So far, you have not left any edit summaries or discussed your edits so none of us can tell what your rationale is.
Furthermore, regarding your additions of Image:Falco Command.jpg and Image:Wolf O'Donnell.jpg...I don't have a problem with having those images there, but if we are adding images of them and removing one of the few images that actually has Fox in it, won't we risk facing issues of undue weight? Please expain below. -- Politizer ( talk) 15:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed the extra whitespace added in this edit and I figured I should explain why here, to avoid any revert wars. I can see why you added that whitespace--so that the beginning of Fox's entry would line up against the left margin, instead of being indented by the image. But I think having that large amount of whitespace (as you can see if in the old edit) is probably not visually pleasing (I don't know if there is an official WP policy on this), and guessed that having the beginning of the Fox entry offset a bit by the image is not as bad as having all that whitespace.
Alternatives to this would be putting the image in question (the image of the Star Fox team) on the right-hand side of the article; that isn't really a good alternative here, though, because there are already two images close together on the right side (the image in the lead-in, and the image of Falco not long after), and squishing this image in between them is also not aesthetically pleasing. One could remove the lead-in image and put this Star Fox team image in the lead-in instead (after all, the lead-in image is from Brawl, not from a Star Fox game); the only problem with that is that this image is very small, and also doesn't look good in the lead-in (trust me, I tried it and it didn't look good).
The best solution is probably just to come up with a better image, put it in the lead-in, and scrap both this and the Brawl image. In the meantime, though, I have put the image where it is because this seems to be the most aesthetically pleasing layout, given the materials we have to work with. -- Politizer ( talk) 19:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Despite Star Fox 2 not being an officially released game, but still nonetheless very real, should Fay Spaniel and Miyu Lynx perhaps have honorable mentions? There might not be very much to put, however, since little can be established of their characters aside from animated gestures and translated dialogue... ProjectPlatinum 00:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
The article really doesn't have anything going for it besides some creation information, so it would be best to merge it her in order to strengthen this article. TTN ( talk) 01:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Why does the article state that Wolf's change in design (from 64 to Assault onward) is "... due to the fact that he got into more serious criminal manners and therefore has a bounty on his head." ?? What would entail such an impression? ( 67.58.249.220 ( talk) 05:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC))
WHY? >_< ( 66.116.4.100 ( talk) 06:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC))
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Caiman (Star Fox). The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 15#Caiman (Star Fox) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards,
SONIC
678
07:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The redirect
Slippy has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Slippy until a consensus is reached.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
15:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Vixy Reinard has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Vixy Reinard until a consensus is reached.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
15:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
As a result of
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22#Vixy Reinard, here are the contributions of the article formerly at
Vixy Reinard. --
Tavix (
talk)
22:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
|
---|
|
The redirect
List of minor characters in the Star Fox series has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § List of minor characters in the Star Fox series until a consensus is reached.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
15:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)