|
![]() | List of franchises established on Nintendo consoles was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 03 July 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Nintendo products. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
|
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Can someone fix the links to Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!! and Punch-Out!! so that it doesn't mess up the table (title, developer, release dates)? I tried to fix it but it didn't work. 2605:E000:121D:8BF5:E53D:C0CC:493F:919F ( talk) 22:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's impossible to fix it because of an exclamation mark problem. Idk if I'm wrong, but I tried my best to fix the problem, but in vain. Djdisjcnw ( talk) 01:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
List of mobile games published by Nintendo and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 25#List of mobile games published by Nintendo until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 20:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Okay, so recently, someone discovered Doom, Minecraft, and Minecraft Dungeons to have the same barcode header as other published Nintendo titles, but I also have questions. First off, why aren't these games then listed as published by Nintendo on their websites, eShop listings, and even their financial earnings? Also, could it just be that Nintendo helped distribute these titles and nothing more? I don't know the whole barcode thing and would just like some clarification since I'm confused. Thank you for your time. NinStar123 ( talk) 17:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Minecraft games for wii u and 3ds are included in this list too, not just the nintendo switch Minecraft games btw. All minecraft games (wii u, 3ds, switch) and doom are included here because there barcode begin with 045496 (nintendo publication code), so DON'T remove these games pls. i didn't know much about nintendo barcodes either, but I found a website about them: https://ppltoast.wordpress.com/2020/02/27/a-look-into-nintendos-barcodes/
Nintendo didn't listed Minecraft games and Doom as Nintendo published products on their website and on e-shop because they just helped Mojang (Minecraft) and Bethesda (Doom) distributing them (but they still count as nintendo products, despite nintendo co-publishing and distributing these games).
There's not much difference about publication and distribution. For example (im out of context... sorry), the majority of Rareware games on N64 were published by them (Conker's Bad Fur Day, Jet Force Jemini, Perfect Dark, Diddy Kong Racing). There was also Conker's Pocket Tales for Game Boy Color which was published by Rareware. But all of the above were "Distributed exclusively by Nintendo", as shown on their boxart. They've also got the barcode prefix that begin with 045496, despite being published by Rareware, so DON'T remove them either pls. Djdisjcnw ( talk) 00:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
i mean, there is a diffrence about publishing and distributing, but no a huge difference. Djdisjcnw ( talk) 00:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Is there a reason this list doesn't include the consoles themselves (NES, SNES, Game Boy, DS, etc)? I imagine they would count as Nintendo products. - Joltman ( talk) 18:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Nintendo's entire modern business model relies on having exclusive software for its hardware. The idea that a day one all-platforms release like "GTA: Definitive Edition" could possibly belong on this list is absurd, and therefore so is whatever reason was used to justify adding it. If being distributed by Nintendo makes it a Nintendo products, then *any game* that debuts as a timed exclusive for a Nintendo console would be a Nintendo product, and that is simply not the reality of Nintendo's brand. 209.6.175.194 ( talk) 18:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
PLEASE stop adding "distributed" games into the list without sourcing; the only "distributed" games that have reliable proof are various Bethesda, Mojang and Grasshopper Manufacture games; if u have any enquiries ask at my talk page.
STB ( talk) 09:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Huge sections of this article are being sourced to GameFAQs. GameFAQs is an unreliable WP:USERG source, per WP:VG/S. Anything sourced to GameFAQs needs a new source or removed. -- ferret ( talk) 17:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Source 1 on this article is this page. Looking at the classic toys, it is used for nearly every toy there, and yet has many problems. 1) The toys in the article completely differ from the ones in the source, the source has less toys and not all the toys in that source are even used in the article. 2) The source is inaccurate with dates, i.e. Nearly every source that isn't that page lists the "Eleconga" as released in 1972, while the source list it as 1970 or the "Ultra Scope" being stated as released in 1969, however boxes show a copyright date of 1971. The source is clearly misused and inaccurate, but removing it will require finding new sources for all of classic toys which is a bit of an undertaking. 173.54.23.191 ( talk) 21:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
|
![]() | List of franchises established on Nintendo consoles was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 03 July 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Nintendo products. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Can someone fix the links to Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!! and Punch-Out!! so that it doesn't mess up the table (title, developer, release dates)? I tried to fix it but it didn't work. 2605:E000:121D:8BF5:E53D:C0CC:493F:919F ( talk) 22:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it's impossible to fix it because of an exclamation mark problem. Idk if I'm wrong, but I tried my best to fix the problem, but in vain. Djdisjcnw ( talk) 01:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
List of mobile games published by Nintendo and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 25#List of mobile games published by Nintendo until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk) 20:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Okay, so recently, someone discovered Doom, Minecraft, and Minecraft Dungeons to have the same barcode header as other published Nintendo titles, but I also have questions. First off, why aren't these games then listed as published by Nintendo on their websites, eShop listings, and even their financial earnings? Also, could it just be that Nintendo helped distribute these titles and nothing more? I don't know the whole barcode thing and would just like some clarification since I'm confused. Thank you for your time. NinStar123 ( talk) 17:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Minecraft games for wii u and 3ds are included in this list too, not just the nintendo switch Minecraft games btw. All minecraft games (wii u, 3ds, switch) and doom are included here because there barcode begin with 045496 (nintendo publication code), so DON'T remove these games pls. i didn't know much about nintendo barcodes either, but I found a website about them: https://ppltoast.wordpress.com/2020/02/27/a-look-into-nintendos-barcodes/
Nintendo didn't listed Minecraft games and Doom as Nintendo published products on their website and on e-shop because they just helped Mojang (Minecraft) and Bethesda (Doom) distributing them (but they still count as nintendo products, despite nintendo co-publishing and distributing these games).
There's not much difference about publication and distribution. For example (im out of context... sorry), the majority of Rareware games on N64 were published by them (Conker's Bad Fur Day, Jet Force Jemini, Perfect Dark, Diddy Kong Racing). There was also Conker's Pocket Tales for Game Boy Color which was published by Rareware. But all of the above were "Distributed exclusively by Nintendo", as shown on their boxart. They've also got the barcode prefix that begin with 045496, despite being published by Rareware, so DON'T remove them either pls. Djdisjcnw ( talk) 00:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
i mean, there is a diffrence about publishing and distributing, but no a huge difference. Djdisjcnw ( talk) 00:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Is there a reason this list doesn't include the consoles themselves (NES, SNES, Game Boy, DS, etc)? I imagine they would count as Nintendo products. - Joltman ( talk) 18:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Nintendo's entire modern business model relies on having exclusive software for its hardware. The idea that a day one all-platforms release like "GTA: Definitive Edition" could possibly belong on this list is absurd, and therefore so is whatever reason was used to justify adding it. If being distributed by Nintendo makes it a Nintendo products, then *any game* that debuts as a timed exclusive for a Nintendo console would be a Nintendo product, and that is simply not the reality of Nintendo's brand. 209.6.175.194 ( talk) 18:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
PLEASE stop adding "distributed" games into the list without sourcing; the only "distributed" games that have reliable proof are various Bethesda, Mojang and Grasshopper Manufacture games; if u have any enquiries ask at my talk page.
STB ( talk) 09:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Huge sections of this article are being sourced to GameFAQs. GameFAQs is an unreliable WP:USERG source, per WP:VG/S. Anything sourced to GameFAQs needs a new source or removed. -- ferret ( talk) 17:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Source 1 on this article is this page. Looking at the classic toys, it is used for nearly every toy there, and yet has many problems. 1) The toys in the article completely differ from the ones in the source, the source has less toys and not all the toys in that source are even used in the article. 2) The source is inaccurate with dates, i.e. Nearly every source that isn't that page lists the "Eleconga" as released in 1972, while the source list it as 1970 or the "Ultra Scope" being stated as released in 1969, however boxes show a copyright date of 1971. The source is clearly misused and inaccurate, but removing it will require finding new sources for all of classic toys which is a bit of an undertaking. 173.54.23.191 ( talk) 21:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)