This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where are the cruisers, destroyers etc. ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.88.228.225 ( talk) 15:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Please advise what's the issue that we should be talking or fixing for with this article.
Da'jhan 02:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
As far as I could see, the need to Wikify was only some minor points, which I have done.
I have standardised the abbreviations for knots (kn) - see the first paragraph of Knot (speed), and horsepower (hp) - see the first paragraph of Horsepower. I noted that a couple of the power ratings were given as PS, which I presume is the same. If I have got that wrong, I apologise. I have also made a few changes on capitalisation.
I do not understand some of the terms, particularly "all geared turbine" - a link to an explanation would be a good idea, since historical material may not be understood by modern readers.
I am not clear about user Emana's point about notability or usability, because you cannot foresee how someone will use this. However, it might be a good thing to include some data about the numbers of each type. I know there is a listing at List of ships of the Japanese Navy but a summary of numbers would give a reader an idea of the scale of the navy. What do you think? Patche99z ( talk) 21:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The article gives a displacement for every class of ship, but since it avoids saying if that displacement is in short tons or long tons and if that displacement is the treaty displacement or for a full load, it is nearly useless. 2601:645:101:1874:94B2:2F1:9E8C:2D23 ( talk) 21:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
I missed Kaibōkan-ships.-- Falkmart ( talk) 12:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, people. Look at the battlecruisers table; I have added a column of what I think is vital info. Should this be done for the other ship types? Hungrydog55 ( talk) 00:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where are the cruisers, destroyers etc. ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.88.228.225 ( talk) 15:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Please advise what's the issue that we should be talking or fixing for with this article.
Da'jhan 02:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
As far as I could see, the need to Wikify was only some minor points, which I have done.
I have standardised the abbreviations for knots (kn) - see the first paragraph of Knot (speed), and horsepower (hp) - see the first paragraph of Horsepower. I noted that a couple of the power ratings were given as PS, which I presume is the same. If I have got that wrong, I apologise. I have also made a few changes on capitalisation.
I do not understand some of the terms, particularly "all geared turbine" - a link to an explanation would be a good idea, since historical material may not be understood by modern readers.
I am not clear about user Emana's point about notability or usability, because you cannot foresee how someone will use this. However, it might be a good thing to include some data about the numbers of each type. I know there is a listing at List of ships of the Japanese Navy but a summary of numbers would give a reader an idea of the scale of the navy. What do you think? Patche99z ( talk) 21:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The article gives a displacement for every class of ship, but since it avoids saying if that displacement is in short tons or long tons and if that displacement is the treaty displacement or for a full load, it is nearly useless. 2601:645:101:1874:94B2:2F1:9E8C:2D23 ( talk) 21:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
I missed Kaibōkan-ships.-- Falkmart ( talk) 12:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, people. Look at the battlecruisers table; I have added a column of what I think is vital info. Should this be done for the other ship types? Hungrydog55 ( talk) 00:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)