This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Leonardo AW609 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Can the BA 609 really be considered the "civil version of the Osprey" ?? It has a completely different fuselage, empennage etc. Osprey has thrice the max. weight, twice the range !-- Iediteverything 12:43, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Born2flie: Shame when there is so much more information available out there than what is presented here. --18:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Rolled my sandbox into the main article. Added an infobox based on the UAV (the airplane infobox misses lots of details) and tried to convert lists into prose. There is still a lot of work to be done. - Davandron | Talk 23:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
The picture that appears in the main page is of Prototype #1 in airplane mode flight, which I uploaded from the Bell/Agusta website. However, there is another good publicity photo which I also uploaded and might find a good place in the article:
Thanks. Finding and uploading pics is not one of my strong suits, though once they are on Wiki, I do fine with them. I don't usually get involved with copyrights and fair-use issues on images, but I think these you have posted are fine. However, there are Wikipedians who fill their idle time by checking all images to see if they should "really" be used or not, especially in articles which have no other pics :) . They may cause some problems, but I hope not. This article definitley needed pics. - BillCJ 20:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:BA609AG helicopter mode.jpg
I think I've completed the missing specification data from the AW website. If people think it's complete the tag can be removed. FitzyJ ( talk) 15:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
The specs say 275 knots and 25,000 feet as maximum. This says 306 knots level at 30,100 feet, at 1:05pm. TGCP ( talk) 19:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=AgustaWestland_AW609&oldid=608980680&diff=prev
So it makes a large difference from conventional helicopters. Hcobb ( talk) 17:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
What would these "anti-tiltrotor" edits be?
So what exactly is the bias in these edits, which all seem to be technical details from well regarded sources?
So move it to the tiltrotor page and note it as one of the tradeoffs that make tiltrotor better at short field operations while tiltwing is better at vertical operations? (Do we have a winged helicopter page to tie this all into?) Hcobb ( talk) 22:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
I would like to move this page to "Leonardo AW609" Thermofan ( talk) 11:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Leonardo AW609 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Can the BA 609 really be considered the "civil version of the Osprey" ?? It has a completely different fuselage, empennage etc. Osprey has thrice the max. weight, twice the range !-- Iediteverything 12:43, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Born2flie: Shame when there is so much more information available out there than what is presented here. --18:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Rolled my sandbox into the main article. Added an infobox based on the UAV (the airplane infobox misses lots of details) and tried to convert lists into prose. There is still a lot of work to be done. - Davandron | Talk 23:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
The picture that appears in the main page is of Prototype #1 in airplane mode flight, which I uploaded from the Bell/Agusta website. However, there is another good publicity photo which I also uploaded and might find a good place in the article:
Thanks. Finding and uploading pics is not one of my strong suits, though once they are on Wiki, I do fine with them. I don't usually get involved with copyrights and fair-use issues on images, but I think these you have posted are fine. However, there are Wikipedians who fill their idle time by checking all images to see if they should "really" be used or not, especially in articles which have no other pics :) . They may cause some problems, but I hope not. This article definitley needed pics. - BillCJ 20:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:BA609AG helicopter mode.jpg
I think I've completed the missing specification data from the AW website. If people think it's complete the tag can be removed. FitzyJ ( talk) 15:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
The specs say 275 knots and 25,000 feet as maximum. This says 306 knots level at 30,100 feet, at 1:05pm. TGCP ( talk) 19:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=AgustaWestland_AW609&oldid=608980680&diff=prev
So it makes a large difference from conventional helicopters. Hcobb ( talk) 17:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
What would these "anti-tiltrotor" edits be?
So what exactly is the bias in these edits, which all seem to be technical details from well regarded sources?
So move it to the tiltrotor page and note it as one of the tradeoffs that make tiltrotor better at short field operations while tiltwing is better at vertical operations? (Do we have a winged helicopter page to tie this all into?) Hcobb ( talk) 22:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
I would like to move this page to "Leonardo AW609" Thermofan ( talk) 11:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)