![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Have removed red link to Lithium Hydroxide canister. Why does a canister type need its own acronym, let alone its own article!
CaptinJohn ( talk) 13:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no move. JPG-GR ( talk) 01:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
LHC → LHC (disambiguation) — I'm proposing moving this dab page to allow LHC to redirect directly to Large Hadron Collider, with a suitable {{ this}} transclusion to direct users to the dab page. From a global point of view, the collider is extremely prevalent in the news, and is only going to become more so over the next year. I suspect the other entries are much less likely to be abbreviated to the LHC acronym, and are less likely to be what people are looking for. —-- Mark Chovain 00:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.I fail to see how any single one of the LHC abbreviations are any more notable than another. This page should not be redirected. Flibirigit ( talk) 01:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:NC: "Avoid the use of abbreviations, including acronyms, in page naming unless the term you are naming is almost exclusively known only by its abbreviation and is widely known and used in that form." ENeville ( talk) 07:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Have removed red link to Lithium Hydroxide canister. Why does a canister type need its own acronym, let alone its own article!
CaptinJohn ( talk) 13:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no move. JPG-GR ( talk) 01:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
LHC → LHC (disambiguation) — I'm proposing moving this dab page to allow LHC to redirect directly to Large Hadron Collider, with a suitable {{ this}} transclusion to direct users to the dab page. From a global point of view, the collider is extremely prevalent in the news, and is only going to become more so over the next year. I suspect the other entries are much less likely to be abbreviated to the LHC acronym, and are less likely to be what people are looking for. —-- Mark Chovain 00:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.I fail to see how any single one of the LHC abbreviations are any more notable than another. This page should not be redirected. Flibirigit ( talk) 01:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:NC: "Avoid the use of abbreviations, including acronyms, in page naming unless the term you are naming is almost exclusively known only by its abbreviation and is widely known and used in that form." ENeville ( talk) 07:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)