This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
LGBT pride article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | On 31 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Pride (LGBT). The result of the discussion was Moved to LGBT pride. |
I get that this is a controversial subject and criticism should be mentioned, but fringe should not be over represented and the main article for gay pride should not be overwhelmed with these fringe views in opposition to it without some balance. overall, the section seems pointless at times and over bearing in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.204.252 ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to LGBT pride. This is the most widely agreed upon title. ( non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 01:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Gay pride → Pride (LGBT) – As several editors noted in the previous discussion, the WP:COMMONNAME today is simply "Pride". ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 18:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Not moved should be used when a consensus has formed to keep the current title and not rename the article(s) in question. For instance, a proposal to rename Bob Dylan to Squeezy Joe would likely result in everyone (or nearly everyone) agreeing that the proposed move should not take place; this notifies other editors that they should probably not propose this move in the future until and unless circumstances change.
If an article title has been stable for a long time,[9] and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title. If it has never been stable, or it has been unstable for a long time, and no consensus can be reached on what the title should be, default to the title the article had when the first major contribution after the article ceased to be a stub was made.WP:TITLECHANGES Ethanpet113 ( talk) 12:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change “cable TV station” (first paragraph) to “cable TV channel” or “cable TV network”. A station is a physical location that broadcasts, the link goes to an article about a channel (actually a network that exists over different channels in different countries). 2600:1010:B1AC:30E6:C96C:7A1B:A888:9A56 ( talk) 01:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Essa é uma das siglas mais aceitas. LGBT não representa toda a diversidade. 2804:214:8629:82D9:1:0:B18E:4895 ( talk) 11:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Having a long and proud history of protesting against the powerful, Pride should have some common ground with the like-minded groups. So, instead of taking corporate money, they might have supported the right of groups protesting against powerful people.
Given Just Stop Oil events, would not a section on Pride and Protester be useful and of interest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.196.97 ( talk) 07:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
The sources that Brenda Howard, Robert A. Martin, and L. Craig Schoonmaker had anything to do with the word "pride" are quite dodgy or non-existent. It looks like Howard had less to do with the use of the word pride and seem she may have been more about being one of the founders of Christopher Street Liberation Day. Are there more reliable sources and details for the claim they had anything to do with inventing or popularizing the word "Pride"? Myotus ( talk) 18:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
LGBT pride article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | On 31 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Pride (LGBT). The result of the discussion was Moved to LGBT pride. |
I get that this is a controversial subject and criticism should be mentioned, but fringe should not be over represented and the main article for gay pride should not be overwhelmed with these fringe views in opposition to it without some balance. overall, the section seems pointless at times and over bearing in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.204.252 ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to LGBT pride. This is the most widely agreed upon title. ( non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 01:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Gay pride → Pride (LGBT) – As several editors noted in the previous discussion, the WP:COMMONNAME today is simply "Pride". ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 18:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Not moved should be used when a consensus has formed to keep the current title and not rename the article(s) in question. For instance, a proposal to rename Bob Dylan to Squeezy Joe would likely result in everyone (or nearly everyone) agreeing that the proposed move should not take place; this notifies other editors that they should probably not propose this move in the future until and unless circumstances change.
If an article title has been stable for a long time,[9] and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title. If it has never been stable, or it has been unstable for a long time, and no consensus can be reached on what the title should be, default to the title the article had when the first major contribution after the article ceased to be a stub was made.WP:TITLECHANGES Ethanpet113 ( talk) 12:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change “cable TV station” (first paragraph) to “cable TV channel” or “cable TV network”. A station is a physical location that broadcasts, the link goes to an article about a channel (actually a network that exists over different channels in different countries). 2600:1010:B1AC:30E6:C96C:7A1B:A888:9A56 ( talk) 01:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Essa é uma das siglas mais aceitas. LGBT não representa toda a diversidade. 2804:214:8629:82D9:1:0:B18E:4895 ( talk) 11:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Having a long and proud history of protesting against the powerful, Pride should have some common ground with the like-minded groups. So, instead of taking corporate money, they might have supported the right of groups protesting against powerful people.
Given Just Stop Oil events, would not a section on Pride and Protester be useful and of interest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.196.97 ( talk) 07:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
The sources that Brenda Howard, Robert A. Martin, and L. Craig Schoonmaker had anything to do with the word "pride" are quite dodgy or non-existent. It looks like Howard had less to do with the use of the word pride and seem she may have been more about being one of the founders of Christopher Street Liberation Day. Are there more reliable sources and details for the claim they had anything to do with inventing or popularizing the word "Pride"? Myotus ( talk) 18:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)