![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have an image but it won't view, can one of you frequent editors please help me? m w ( talk) 13:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Phthinosuchusisanancestor
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Kyūshū Hikōki K.K. - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 05:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kyushu Q1W. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
No source is cited for this claim, and I think that it is at least open to debate. During WWI, the British developed the SS class airship specifically to counter U-boats, and by some definitions (including that given in the Wikipedia Aircraft) article) an airship is a type of aircraft. If a source can be found, this should probably be clarified, and without such a source, I don't think the 'first' claim should be made at all. 86.129.239.85 ( talk) 03:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have an image but it won't view, can one of you frequent editors please help me? m w ( talk) 13:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Phthinosuchusisanancestor
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Kyūshū Hikōki K.K. - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 05:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kyushu Q1W. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
No source is cited for this claim, and I think that it is at least open to debate. During WWI, the British developed the SS class airship specifically to counter U-boats, and by some definitions (including that given in the Wikipedia Aircraft) article) an airship is a type of aircraft. If a source can be found, this should probably be clarified, and without such a source, I don't think the 'first' claim should be made at all. 86.129.239.85 ( talk) 03:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)