This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
AlexAnderson97 ( talk) 04:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC) This article could be improved upon by me by going more depth into the movie. Furthermore, there is no talk page about this subject, suggesting that this is a topic that has not been looked into a great deal. There is also an issue of it being labeled as an American Swedish movie which, to my current knowledge, is not the case.
I am thinking of adding a possible comparison of this movie to its predecessor "Paris is Burning" as they have similar themes. I could look at how drag and the ball scene has changed since the first film, as they are about 26 years apart. I think another addition that could be useful is addressing the topic of HIV/AIDS activism within this film. -- JereSierr ( talk) 14:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I have added a section on HIV/AIDS activism in the film to this article and plan on adding some more information about that soon to help improve the article a little more.-- JereSierr ( talk) 06:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think there are aspects of genderqueer, race and class-based defamation within this article that instead of understanding the many problems within the LGBT community, desensitizes the reader with rough language and no clear solution. Could the use of the language be a little less "charged", i.e. could there be the usage of words that have majority support in being euphemistic instead of dysphemistic? The overall description is also very tangential, where there is not a clear outline to what the documentary is really trying to change for the better. I am sending a legal complaint to the Wikipedia Reponse Team if there is no motivation to meet in the middle.
Sjoseph2 (
talk) 18:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The GLAAD is based upon the principle of anti-defamation within the LGBT community. Therefore, the integrity of the documentary is lost by words that are not explained well. The word drag for instance, is derogatory and vague, it does not really tell anything about the person within. There is no reason to instigate legal proceedings for this, or am I incorrect? We could, therefore, change the following to decrease stigmatization and your colonial mentality:
1. drag to genderqueer
2. black lives matter to black pride
3. stigma to homophobia
4. H.I.V. to S.T.D.
5. remove the topic of sex work
Sjoseph2 (
talk)
From WP:PREFER: "Administrators who have made substantive content changes to an article are considered involved and must not use their advanced permissions to further their own positions. When involved in a dispute, it is almost always wisest to respect the editing policies that bind all editors and call for input from an uninvolved administrator, rather than to invite controversy by acting unilaterally." I don't see "Persistent disruptive editing" to indefinitely protect the page. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 20:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
AlexAnderson97 ( talk) 04:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC) This article could be improved upon by me by going more depth into the movie. Furthermore, there is no talk page about this subject, suggesting that this is a topic that has not been looked into a great deal. There is also an issue of it being labeled as an American Swedish movie which, to my current knowledge, is not the case.
I am thinking of adding a possible comparison of this movie to its predecessor "Paris is Burning" as they have similar themes. I could look at how drag and the ball scene has changed since the first film, as they are about 26 years apart. I think another addition that could be useful is addressing the topic of HIV/AIDS activism within this film. -- JereSierr ( talk) 14:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I have added a section on HIV/AIDS activism in the film to this article and plan on adding some more information about that soon to help improve the article a little more.-- JereSierr ( talk) 06:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think there are aspects of genderqueer, race and class-based defamation within this article that instead of understanding the many problems within the LGBT community, desensitizes the reader with rough language and no clear solution. Could the use of the language be a little less "charged", i.e. could there be the usage of words that have majority support in being euphemistic instead of dysphemistic? The overall description is also very tangential, where there is not a clear outline to what the documentary is really trying to change for the better. I am sending a legal complaint to the Wikipedia Reponse Team if there is no motivation to meet in the middle.
Sjoseph2 (
talk) 18:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The GLAAD is based upon the principle of anti-defamation within the LGBT community. Therefore, the integrity of the documentary is lost by words that are not explained well. The word drag for instance, is derogatory and vague, it does not really tell anything about the person within. There is no reason to instigate legal proceedings for this, or am I incorrect? We could, therefore, change the following to decrease stigmatization and your colonial mentality:
1. drag to genderqueer
2. black lives matter to black pride
3. stigma to homophobia
4. H.I.V. to S.T.D.
5. remove the topic of sex work
Sjoseph2 (
talk)
From WP:PREFER: "Administrators who have made substantive content changes to an article are considered involved and must not use their advanced permissions to further their own positions. When involved in a dispute, it is almost always wisest to respect the editing policies that bind all editors and call for input from an uninvolved administrator, rather than to invite controversy by acting unilaterally." I don't see "Persistent disruptive editing" to indefinitely protect the page. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 20:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)