This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kawasaki disease article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Kawasaki disease was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Kawasaki disease.
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is anyone able to add a pathology section? The disease is explained and discussed but the underlying mechanism isn't mentioned.
The Treatment is repeated in the Prognosis. Suggest removing the final line from the prognosis section. Kilbosh 14:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
I clarified the prevalence of coronary artery aneurysms. Can someone show me how to reference the source? It is in Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Mar;25(3):245-9. Pkoetters 05:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)If I read this wiki entry correctly, only 2% of children die from this.
I'm wondering if in fact Jett died from this , did the fact that his parents are Scientologists (don't adhere to some modern medical treatments) have anything to do with his death. In other words, was he getting proper treatment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.76.241 ( talk) 21:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry this is now irrelevant, updated article explained that the death was due to a head injury sustained during a seizure.
I removed that section/sentence because he died from head injuries, not from the disease.
NeoDeGenero (
talk) 04:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Jett Travolta son of John Travolta is hardly "famous", and is probably not even notable. It is certainly not clear that he died from Kawasaki Syndrome. Perhaps this section should be renamed, or deleted? AussieBoy ( talk) 06:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Can Kawasaki disease cause seizures? F W Nietzsche ( talk) 09:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC) theoretically,KD (kawasaki disease),could cause febrile seizures,as persistant high fever is a hallmark of KD.However,jett had the disease at age 2,and the only known long term sequalae from KD is cardiovascular,so there is no reason to think that jett's death is in any way related to KD.Regards. Immunize ( talk) 21:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, seizures are seen during the disease, but long-term effects or sequelae has not been determined. Children with Kawasaki syndrome do not continue to have seizures after the disease has resolved. Seizures are likely related to Jett's autism, as many parents of autistic children have noted he had autism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.65.190 ( talk) 03:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Now that Kawasaki disease is in the news, this page will get a lot of hits. It attracts vandalism, but it's also a teachable moment to educate people about Kawasaki disease.
It's a good educational opportunity, because autoimmune diseases, and specifically vasculitis, is a large class of important diseases with high incidence. Nbauman ( talk) 06:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
A recent international study has identified new genes that appear to affect susceptibility to Kawasaki disease. The study found that genes involved in cardiovascular function and inflammation may be particularly important and some seem to function together.
Reference: The article is in PLoS Genetics, an open-access journal, and is freely available online at http://www.plosgenetics.org/doi/pgen.1000319. Citation: Burgner D, Davila S, Breunis WB, Ng SB, Li Y, et al. (2009) A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel and Functionally Related Susceptibility Loci for Kawasaki Disease. PLoS Genet 5(1): e1000319. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000319 PMID: 19132087 Plosgenetics ( talk) 16:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Whoever is working on this article - check refs 3 and 4 in the Presentation section - I removed some vandalism, but the refs themselves appeared to be valid sources for Kawasaki disease. I'm just not sure where you want to use them. — Ched ~ (yes?)/ © 06:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
I categorized this under Category:Virus-related cutaneous conditions under the rational from section Pathogenesis chapter 80:1232-4 from Dermatology Second edition from Bolognia, Jean L. ISBN 1-4160-2999-0. [1] Calmer Waters 20:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello :) We'll begin the review in a couple days or so... I need to read thru closely and prepare, etc., first. Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I think we can start now :) I like to focus on just a few issues at a time, so things don't seem overwhelming; I also like the nominator to set the pace of the review. Since you or whomever helps (if) will be doing the work, feel free to take as much time as you choose... and holler when you're ready! No hurry, ever :)
Now, about the article; we are definitely getting it to GA... but we have a lot of stuff to do. You've done some good work generally defining the disease; now we'll go deeper! So, first up:
Well, that's enough stuff to worry about until you are ready to move on. Absolutely, tell me/ask me whatever you are concerned with or need :) And always, take whatever time you need! Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Ok...I'm back :) Here's what the Classification section needs now:
This seems tedious... and it is, actually. But we need in this section to establish the identity of KD among its 'peers', as much as possible. Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Please check the tables at the diagnosis and the symptoms sections, and give me an opinion MaenK.A. Talk 14:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This content should usually be combined into the article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Update: almost done with classification; I may have done a poor job explaining this type section... I can 'do' slightly better than I can 'tell', apparently ;) Two new things for you to do:
Also, let's not cut/paste text from a source; if this applies to you, make it a habit of writing all of your additions to any wiki article completely in your own words. Good practice, too, for the further you go in your medical career :) If you want to impress the hardcore, persnickity professors/doctors that are void of human emotions... writing proficiently in all areas will do it every time!
Rcej (Robert) -
talk 06:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Next: in the Signs and symptoms section; the bullet list of common symptoms is basically a repetition of the paragraph above, albeit more specific. Let's incorporate that listing into the paragraph, and the less common symptoms in that table could instead be a bullet list below the paragraph.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
On the grid of pictures picture G doesn't look like any way of giving BCG that I've seen (could be a Heaf test I suppose). 3x3 grids of needle pricks look like some form of a skin prick (allergy) test to me. Looks like it came from a journal but doesn't necesarily mean the right caption or correct picture made it into the article. Going to be awkward to photoshop it out though. Arfgab ( talk) 14:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:KAWASAKI1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 02:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
This line is misleading for the prognosis of kawasaki disease. Though this disease is a type of coronary vasculitis, coronary vasculitis isn't exclusively kawasaki disease. If it is meant to be representative of kawasaki disease then the 2% quoted is most likely a SMR, or standard mortality ratio, that quantifies an increase in mortality relative to the general population. For instance, in "Sudden Death in an Infant Revealing Atypical Kawasaki Disease" the mortality rate caused by KD is 2.8% higher than the general population. [2] The Merck Manual quotes 0.17% mortality rate with adequate therapy in the United States.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimqcat ( talk • contribs) 04:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
The article as it is now states that we should call it Kawasaki Syndrome, in the causes section. The reasons given for this are that the cause is not known. However, immediately after this statement, the article resumes calling it Kawasaki Disease. Is this an issue, and if so, is there a way to correct it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.189.191 ( talk) 15:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The first couple of sentences here could be reworded to be clearer. Also the wiki link from "remittent" goes to the article "Fever". I made an attempt at fixing the latter and then realised I'd misinterpreted the sentence. Will try to remember to revisit but writing here in case I don't. Dichohecho ( talk) 12:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484 JFW | T@lk 08:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Doc James: This is the definition provided at the start of the main text of the current AHA guidelines: [1]
Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute, self-limited febrile illness of unknown cause that predominantly affects children <5 years of age.
I believe we need to go with something along those lines at the start of the lead that highlight the paediatric context – especially for the benefit of casual readers, including ones coming rapidly to this page following current newspaper reports regarding unusual COVID manifestations in some infants. 86.134.212.26 ( talk) 14:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Adding: The definition in our frequently used PubMed Health source [2] also immediately highlights the paediatric context:
Kawasaki (KAH-wah-SAH-ke) disease is a rare childhood disease. It's a form of a condition called vasculitis...
86.134.212.26 ( talk) 15:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
At present we have a summary at the foot of == History == of the ongoing open questions regarding Kawasaki-like presentations. Imo, that's appropriate, whereas (per WP:RECENT, whereas news-style (local/global) updates would not be on this page about a particular clinical entity ( example). Clearly, per WP:MEDRS, it would be premature to insert speculative/primary-sourced content in clinical sections (e.g. == Causes ==). A little like User:KalanK10 (I think) however, I have been wondering whether some brief mention of the issue should be made at the foot of the lead, as that might be what general readers would expect. Personally, I feel something of the sort [5] may be appropriate. 86.134.212.26 ( talk) 10:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Under this section there are pictures of symptoms, but they are not stated except by a letter. Can someone more knowledgeable than I am please label these symptoms by the letter in order to clarify the symptom pictured.
We mention PMIS both in the infobox under differential and in the second paragraph. We do not also need a banner at the top of the article.
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 05:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
@ User:Doricke: The content added here is sourced to a (possibly still not peer-reviewed) hypothesis-type paper which does not comply with WP:MEDRS:
A novel hypothesis that Kawasaki disease is caused by dysregulated activation of mast cells by Fc receptor-bound pathogen antibodies accounts for much of the pathology of this disease [1]. Histamine release from mast cells induces contraction of pericyte or effector cells on cardiac capillaries impeding blood flow [1]. Back pressure from capilaries occulsions induces coronary aneurysms in some patients [1]. Other Kawasaki disease symptoms can be linked to increased histamine levels.
{{
cite web}}
: Check |archiveurl=
value (
help)
86.186.155.159 ( talk) 08:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
From diff (apparently following on from earlier addition of analagous content by Doricke, a SPA whose user name virtually coincides with that of the first author of this hypothesis-type paper):
The hypothesis has been put forward that Kawasaki Disease is caused by antibody activation of mast cells. [1]
86.186.155.159 ( talk) 08:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
(some *selected* recent potential medrs etc, as of June 2020; not all actually cited):
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link) {{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link){{
cite web}}
: |archive-date=
/ |archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 6 May 2020 suggested (
help) {{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link){{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)Research:
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)</ref> {{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)</ref> 86.186.155.159 ( talk) 12:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kawasaki disease article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Kawasaki disease was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Kawasaki disease.
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is anyone able to add a pathology section? The disease is explained and discussed but the underlying mechanism isn't mentioned.
The Treatment is repeated in the Prognosis. Suggest removing the final line from the prognosis section. Kilbosh 14:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
I clarified the prevalence of coronary artery aneurysms. Can someone show me how to reference the source? It is in Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Mar;25(3):245-9. Pkoetters 05:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)If I read this wiki entry correctly, only 2% of children die from this.
I'm wondering if in fact Jett died from this , did the fact that his parents are Scientologists (don't adhere to some modern medical treatments) have anything to do with his death. In other words, was he getting proper treatment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.76.241 ( talk) 21:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry this is now irrelevant, updated article explained that the death was due to a head injury sustained during a seizure.
I removed that section/sentence because he died from head injuries, not from the disease.
NeoDeGenero (
talk) 04:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Jett Travolta son of John Travolta is hardly "famous", and is probably not even notable. It is certainly not clear that he died from Kawasaki Syndrome. Perhaps this section should be renamed, or deleted? AussieBoy ( talk) 06:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Can Kawasaki disease cause seizures? F W Nietzsche ( talk) 09:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC) theoretically,KD (kawasaki disease),could cause febrile seizures,as persistant high fever is a hallmark of KD.However,jett had the disease at age 2,and the only known long term sequalae from KD is cardiovascular,so there is no reason to think that jett's death is in any way related to KD.Regards. Immunize ( talk) 21:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, seizures are seen during the disease, but long-term effects or sequelae has not been determined. Children with Kawasaki syndrome do not continue to have seizures after the disease has resolved. Seizures are likely related to Jett's autism, as many parents of autistic children have noted he had autism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.65.190 ( talk) 03:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Now that Kawasaki disease is in the news, this page will get a lot of hits. It attracts vandalism, but it's also a teachable moment to educate people about Kawasaki disease.
It's a good educational opportunity, because autoimmune diseases, and specifically vasculitis, is a large class of important diseases with high incidence. Nbauman ( talk) 06:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
A recent international study has identified new genes that appear to affect susceptibility to Kawasaki disease. The study found that genes involved in cardiovascular function and inflammation may be particularly important and some seem to function together.
Reference: The article is in PLoS Genetics, an open-access journal, and is freely available online at http://www.plosgenetics.org/doi/pgen.1000319. Citation: Burgner D, Davila S, Breunis WB, Ng SB, Li Y, et al. (2009) A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel and Functionally Related Susceptibility Loci for Kawasaki Disease. PLoS Genet 5(1): e1000319. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000319 PMID: 19132087 Plosgenetics ( talk) 16:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Whoever is working on this article - check refs 3 and 4 in the Presentation section - I removed some vandalism, but the refs themselves appeared to be valid sources for Kawasaki disease. I'm just not sure where you want to use them. — Ched ~ (yes?)/ © 06:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
I categorized this under Category:Virus-related cutaneous conditions under the rational from section Pathogenesis chapter 80:1232-4 from Dermatology Second edition from Bolognia, Jean L. ISBN 1-4160-2999-0. [1] Calmer Waters 20:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello :) We'll begin the review in a couple days or so... I need to read thru closely and prepare, etc., first. Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I think we can start now :) I like to focus on just a few issues at a time, so things don't seem overwhelming; I also like the nominator to set the pace of the review. Since you or whomever helps (if) will be doing the work, feel free to take as much time as you choose... and holler when you're ready! No hurry, ever :)
Now, about the article; we are definitely getting it to GA... but we have a lot of stuff to do. You've done some good work generally defining the disease; now we'll go deeper! So, first up:
Well, that's enough stuff to worry about until you are ready to move on. Absolutely, tell me/ask me whatever you are concerned with or need :) And always, take whatever time you need! Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Ok...I'm back :) Here's what the Classification section needs now:
This seems tedious... and it is, actually. But we need in this section to establish the identity of KD among its 'peers', as much as possible. Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Please check the tables at the diagnosis and the symptoms sections, and give me an opinion MaenK.A. Talk 14:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This content should usually be combined into the article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Update: almost done with classification; I may have done a poor job explaining this type section... I can 'do' slightly better than I can 'tell', apparently ;) Two new things for you to do:
Also, let's not cut/paste text from a source; if this applies to you, make it a habit of writing all of your additions to any wiki article completely in your own words. Good practice, too, for the further you go in your medical career :) If you want to impress the hardcore, persnickity professors/doctors that are void of human emotions... writing proficiently in all areas will do it every time!
Rcej (Robert) -
talk 06:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Next: in the Signs and symptoms section; the bullet list of common symptoms is basically a repetition of the paragraph above, albeit more specific. Let's incorporate that listing into the paragraph, and the less common symptoms in that table could instead be a bullet list below the paragraph.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
On the grid of pictures picture G doesn't look like any way of giving BCG that I've seen (could be a Heaf test I suppose). 3x3 grids of needle pricks look like some form of a skin prick (allergy) test to me. Looks like it came from a journal but doesn't necesarily mean the right caption or correct picture made it into the article. Going to be awkward to photoshop it out though. Arfgab ( talk) 14:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:KAWASAKI1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 02:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
This line is misleading for the prognosis of kawasaki disease. Though this disease is a type of coronary vasculitis, coronary vasculitis isn't exclusively kawasaki disease. If it is meant to be representative of kawasaki disease then the 2% quoted is most likely a SMR, or standard mortality ratio, that quantifies an increase in mortality relative to the general population. For instance, in "Sudden Death in an Infant Revealing Atypical Kawasaki Disease" the mortality rate caused by KD is 2.8% higher than the general population. [2] The Merck Manual quotes 0.17% mortality rate with adequate therapy in the United States.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimqcat ( talk • contribs) 04:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
The article as it is now states that we should call it Kawasaki Syndrome, in the causes section. The reasons given for this are that the cause is not known. However, immediately after this statement, the article resumes calling it Kawasaki Disease. Is this an issue, and if so, is there a way to correct it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.189.191 ( talk) 15:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The first couple of sentences here could be reworded to be clearer. Also the wiki link from "remittent" goes to the article "Fever". I made an attempt at fixing the latter and then realised I'd misinterpreted the sentence. Will try to remember to revisit but writing here in case I don't. Dichohecho ( talk) 12:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484 JFW | T@lk 08:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Doc James: This is the definition provided at the start of the main text of the current AHA guidelines: [1]
Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute, self-limited febrile illness of unknown cause that predominantly affects children <5 years of age.
I believe we need to go with something along those lines at the start of the lead that highlight the paediatric context – especially for the benefit of casual readers, including ones coming rapidly to this page following current newspaper reports regarding unusual COVID manifestations in some infants. 86.134.212.26 ( talk) 14:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Adding: The definition in our frequently used PubMed Health source [2] also immediately highlights the paediatric context:
Kawasaki (KAH-wah-SAH-ke) disease is a rare childhood disease. It's a form of a condition called vasculitis...
86.134.212.26 ( talk) 15:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
At present we have a summary at the foot of == History == of the ongoing open questions regarding Kawasaki-like presentations. Imo, that's appropriate, whereas (per WP:RECENT, whereas news-style (local/global) updates would not be on this page about a particular clinical entity ( example). Clearly, per WP:MEDRS, it would be premature to insert speculative/primary-sourced content in clinical sections (e.g. == Causes ==). A little like User:KalanK10 (I think) however, I have been wondering whether some brief mention of the issue should be made at the foot of the lead, as that might be what general readers would expect. Personally, I feel something of the sort [5] may be appropriate. 86.134.212.26 ( talk) 10:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Under this section there are pictures of symptoms, but they are not stated except by a letter. Can someone more knowledgeable than I am please label these symptoms by the letter in order to clarify the symptom pictured.
We mention PMIS both in the infobox under differential and in the second paragraph. We do not also need a banner at the top of the article.
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 05:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
@ User:Doricke: The content added here is sourced to a (possibly still not peer-reviewed) hypothesis-type paper which does not comply with WP:MEDRS:
A novel hypothesis that Kawasaki disease is caused by dysregulated activation of mast cells by Fc receptor-bound pathogen antibodies accounts for much of the pathology of this disease [1]. Histamine release from mast cells induces contraction of pericyte or effector cells on cardiac capillaries impeding blood flow [1]. Back pressure from capilaries occulsions induces coronary aneurysms in some patients [1]. Other Kawasaki disease symptoms can be linked to increased histamine levels.
{{
cite web}}
: Check |archiveurl=
value (
help)
86.186.155.159 ( talk) 08:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
From diff (apparently following on from earlier addition of analagous content by Doricke, a SPA whose user name virtually coincides with that of the first author of this hypothesis-type paper):
The hypothesis has been put forward that Kawasaki Disease is caused by antibody activation of mast cells. [1]
86.186.155.159 ( talk) 08:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
(some *selected* recent potential medrs etc, as of June 2020; not all actually cited):
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link) {{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link){{
cite web}}
: |archive-date=
/ |archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 6 May 2020 suggested (
help) {{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link){{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)Research:
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)</ref> {{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)</ref> 86.186.155.159 ( talk) 12:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)