This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kannadigas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Kongan/kongu ethnic groups found in the part of Tamilnadu. https://books.google.com/books?id=swNuAAAAMAAJ Dosa origin is linked to Upupi town (Not to be confused with masala dosa) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 ( talk • contribs) 05:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
The native word for Kannada people "Kannadiga" does not seem to harmonize with the soundscapes of the English language - it is as odd as saying "tamil makkal" or "tamil jana" in English - one uses what is natural to English - "Tamilian". I suggest the word "Canarese" or "Canaresian" be employed in the place of "Kannadiga" in this article (mentioning though "Kannadiga is the native word for Kannada people). ~~Naresh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.244.253 ( talk) 06:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
The word Canarese is no longer used,this word was used by British ans Portuguese only during the colonial era. Nijgoykar ( talk) 14:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
This article is way out of control.Pls add relevant sections and follow wikipedia policy...Pls visit the Tamil people page and see how a good ethnic article must be developed...And pls use neutral point of view....Thanks.... ARUNKUMAR P.R Talk 11:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Removed irrelevant and POV section.Still the article needs to be structured like the Tamil people article which is a featured article.
ARUNKUMAR P.R Talk 09:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I am really surprised to read Wikipedia about Kannadiga section. I don't know why Kannadigas are always comparing or treating Tamil language/Tamilians in a harsh way. If for some reason Kannadigas accept that Kannada is a bye-product of Sanskrit then all Kannadigas must be Aryans? But the problem is we should also accept Mandya/Hassan Gowdas as Aryans?
MR can you tell us how Mandya/Hassan Gowdas for Aryans. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
122.172.167.129 (
talk)
11:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Note to this foolish tamil-man above: Go find about Gujjars of North India, then you will know who Gowdas are, be they from Mandya, or Maddur or Hassan....
Kindly see the Goud Saraswat Brahmin page of Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.52.53.206 ( talk) 17:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
do not write anything againt Tamils. This is not a forum to vent your anger and personal attacks
dinesh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshpkm ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
There are few non-kannadigas included the list of Kannidigas. Some even featured in the info box with pics, like Nanadan Nelkini, Deepika Padukone etc. Please remove those names from the list. 188.49.24.149 ( talk) 08:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Same for Rahul Dravid. Despite removal, people keep adding them back. 103.248.30.190 ( talk) 09:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
The user User:Malini.iyyer has removed important and glorifying points from this article which which according to her are not essential.On top she is way to her way of communicating with others is very uncivil.check this out [ [1]].Let me know if the contents she had removed was unnecessary.It is important according to me(Its my personal opinion and does not really matter much here).Clearly her edits have some sort of personal agenda.Lets discuss. Nijgoykar ( talk) 02:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Purandara.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Rajkumar 60s.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Rajkumar 60s.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
Tamils should just stop bothering Kannadigas to take them into our community. No Kannadiga would ever be interested to even listen to a Tamil or even remotely think of Tamils. The very truth is Kannadigas are not Dravidians and have no connections to Tamils whatsoever as claimed by their Dravidianists. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
116.202.157.123 (
talk)
15:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
The ruling dynasties of the Rattas or Nadars or the Rahstrakutas,Seunas or Yadavas of Devagiri and older kanna(karana tribe) and the naata or the (nadar or the rashtrakuta) people once inhabited Maharashtra and other places.. its only with due course of time they reached down south expanding their dominion or other reasons,why should we assume they they migrated from Karnataka?there are remnants of Kannada culture,language etc in maharashtra.The Rattapadi consisted of three maharashtras,Vidarbha,Kuntala(part of karnataka and western maharashta)its mentioned in stone inscription that the settlement of the rattas had three maharashtras,again the word marathi or maharashtra is related and is derived from the word rattas.. so the word maharashtra just means settlements of rattas,moroever all these dynasties spoke deshi dialets which is also called purva halegannada,only when they were sanskrtised and prakritised halegannada was born.y simply assume tht they migrated from karnataka? its very much possible tht all those place in mharashtra were these people rules were originally their settlements as suggested by place name,n they they migrated down south.. Nijgoykar ( talk) 02:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
No demographics section, no religion? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 12:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Think maybe we could get some women up in there? Like, say, half of the photos maybe? Ogress smash! 17:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on
Kannada people. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
The Journal of the Bihar Purävid Parishad, Volumes 4-5, page 414 - excerpt: "A brief survey of the rule of Tirhut makes it clear that the Karnatas were the migrant Paramaras and none-else..." https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VsG1AAAAIAAJ&dq=editions:UCALB4304763
Mithila Under the Karnatas, C. 1097-1325 A.D page 55 also states the dynasty to be Rajputs. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KfYJAQAAIAAJ&q=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&dq=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwie7fCFnt3RAhWHKMAKHfMYAY4Q6AEIHjAA
History of Muslim rule in Tirhut, 1206-1765, A.D. page 28 also makes a similar assertion: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VwYcAQAAMAAJ&q=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&dq=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwie7fCFnt3RAhWHKMAKHfMYAY4Q6AEIJjAC
Damien2016 ( talk) 11:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
You can access the required parts by searching key words or using the Digital Library of India and looking up the page numbers that I have provided. The rest of what you are saying is original research, you can't just assume that Kannadas became Parmar (which is extremely unlikely since Parmars are a patriarchal clan). The Karnata dynasty used Rajput names and were patrons of Maithili culture, not Kannada culture. There is absolutely no primary source indicating that they were Kannada in fact primary sources from the time indicate Rajputs controlling the region (Mithila during the Age of Vidyapati). You can't make me accept anything without concrete proof, the fact is that the origin of the dynasty is dubious and contested by various sources. Damien2016 ( talk) 16:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kannada people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Kautilya3:, @ Pied Hornbill:, @ Doug Weller:, @ Arjayay:
Here are some examples of his disruptive edits:
It seems he has also attacked both Dough Weller and Arjayay previously, but no action seems to have been taken for his vandalism rampage so far. It would be better to lock this page for awhile. 117.198.118.192 ( talk) 23:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
"Backward communities" is not used appropriately among anthropologists or others who communicate frequently about different ethnic groups. The term "other backward communities" under castes and communities, should be removed, unless it is some sort of term of art, that is with a specific (non-offensive) definition in Indian English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C55:7D80:1F9D:93F:1081:4711:726 ( talk) 21:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Please take note @ Sitush: @ Kautilya3: people are adding genetics in South Asian ethnic group pages here which is not allowed according to consensus.Please remove them. 117.198.114.56 ( talk) 17:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kannada term is masala Dhosey & there maybe many kinds of dosa but mainly called masale dhosey/masala dosa. LR1988 ( talk) 19:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Dosa originates from Udupi but Masala dosa is matter of Conjecture. Laks883 ( talk) 03:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kannada people has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Gijantic ( talk) 06:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Want to make some minor edits
![]() | This
edit request to
Kannada people has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Changes in cuisine part - Want to add dishes Gijantic ( talk) 09:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved to Kannadigas. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Kannada people → Kannadiga – "Kannadiga" is the more commonly used term for native Kannada speakers tracing their ancestry to Karnataka. Most sources available in the article also use the term "Kannadiga" instead of "Kannada people". At present, Kannadiga is a redirect to Kannada people. I propose that Kannada people be moved to Kannadiga. Dympies ( talk) 03:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Dympies ( talk) 05:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 06:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kannadigas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Kongan/kongu ethnic groups found in the part of Tamilnadu. https://books.google.com/books?id=swNuAAAAMAAJ Dosa origin is linked to Upupi town (Not to be confused with masala dosa) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laks883 ( talk • contribs) 05:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
The native word for Kannada people "Kannadiga" does not seem to harmonize with the soundscapes of the English language - it is as odd as saying "tamil makkal" or "tamil jana" in English - one uses what is natural to English - "Tamilian". I suggest the word "Canarese" or "Canaresian" be employed in the place of "Kannadiga" in this article (mentioning though "Kannadiga is the native word for Kannada people). ~~Naresh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.244.253 ( talk) 06:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
The word Canarese is no longer used,this word was used by British ans Portuguese only during the colonial era. Nijgoykar ( talk) 14:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
This article is way out of control.Pls add relevant sections and follow wikipedia policy...Pls visit the Tamil people page and see how a good ethnic article must be developed...And pls use neutral point of view....Thanks.... ARUNKUMAR P.R Talk 11:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Removed irrelevant and POV section.Still the article needs to be structured like the Tamil people article which is a featured article.
ARUNKUMAR P.R Talk 09:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I am really surprised to read Wikipedia about Kannadiga section. I don't know why Kannadigas are always comparing or treating Tamil language/Tamilians in a harsh way. If for some reason Kannadigas accept that Kannada is a bye-product of Sanskrit then all Kannadigas must be Aryans? But the problem is we should also accept Mandya/Hassan Gowdas as Aryans?
MR can you tell us how Mandya/Hassan Gowdas for Aryans. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
122.172.167.129 (
talk)
11:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Note to this foolish tamil-man above: Go find about Gujjars of North India, then you will know who Gowdas are, be they from Mandya, or Maddur or Hassan....
Kindly see the Goud Saraswat Brahmin page of Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.52.53.206 ( talk) 17:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
do not write anything againt Tamils. This is not a forum to vent your anger and personal attacks
dinesh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshpkm ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
There are few non-kannadigas included the list of Kannidigas. Some even featured in the info box with pics, like Nanadan Nelkini, Deepika Padukone etc. Please remove those names from the list. 188.49.24.149 ( talk) 08:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Same for Rahul Dravid. Despite removal, people keep adding them back. 103.248.30.190 ( talk) 09:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
The user User:Malini.iyyer has removed important and glorifying points from this article which which according to her are not essential.On top she is way to her way of communicating with others is very uncivil.check this out [ [1]].Let me know if the contents she had removed was unnecessary.It is important according to me(Its my personal opinion and does not really matter much here).Clearly her edits have some sort of personal agenda.Lets discuss. Nijgoykar ( talk) 02:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Purandara.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Rajkumar 60s.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Rajkumar 60s.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
Tamils should just stop bothering Kannadigas to take them into our community. No Kannadiga would ever be interested to even listen to a Tamil or even remotely think of Tamils. The very truth is Kannadigas are not Dravidians and have no connections to Tamils whatsoever as claimed by their Dravidianists. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
116.202.157.123 (
talk)
15:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
The ruling dynasties of the Rattas or Nadars or the Rahstrakutas,Seunas or Yadavas of Devagiri and older kanna(karana tribe) and the naata or the (nadar or the rashtrakuta) people once inhabited Maharashtra and other places.. its only with due course of time they reached down south expanding their dominion or other reasons,why should we assume they they migrated from Karnataka?there are remnants of Kannada culture,language etc in maharashtra.The Rattapadi consisted of three maharashtras,Vidarbha,Kuntala(part of karnataka and western maharashta)its mentioned in stone inscription that the settlement of the rattas had three maharashtras,again the word marathi or maharashtra is related and is derived from the word rattas.. so the word maharashtra just means settlements of rattas,moroever all these dynasties spoke deshi dialets which is also called purva halegannada,only when they were sanskrtised and prakritised halegannada was born.y simply assume tht they migrated from karnataka? its very much possible tht all those place in mharashtra were these people rules were originally their settlements as suggested by place name,n they they migrated down south.. Nijgoykar ( talk) 02:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
No demographics section, no religion? -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 12:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Think maybe we could get some women up in there? Like, say, half of the photos maybe? Ogress smash! 17:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on
Kannada people. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
The Journal of the Bihar Purävid Parishad, Volumes 4-5, page 414 - excerpt: "A brief survey of the rule of Tirhut makes it clear that the Karnatas were the migrant Paramaras and none-else..." https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VsG1AAAAIAAJ&dq=editions:UCALB4304763
Mithila Under the Karnatas, C. 1097-1325 A.D page 55 also states the dynasty to be Rajputs. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KfYJAQAAIAAJ&q=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&dq=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwie7fCFnt3RAhWHKMAKHfMYAY4Q6AEIHjAA
History of Muslim rule in Tirhut, 1206-1765, A.D. page 28 also makes a similar assertion: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VwYcAQAAMAAJ&q=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&dq=Malladeva+rajputs+of+tirhut&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwie7fCFnt3RAhWHKMAKHfMYAY4Q6AEIJjAC
Damien2016 ( talk) 11:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
You can access the required parts by searching key words or using the Digital Library of India and looking up the page numbers that I have provided. The rest of what you are saying is original research, you can't just assume that Kannadas became Parmar (which is extremely unlikely since Parmars are a patriarchal clan). The Karnata dynasty used Rajput names and were patrons of Maithili culture, not Kannada culture. There is absolutely no primary source indicating that they were Kannada in fact primary sources from the time indicate Rajputs controlling the region (Mithila during the Age of Vidyapati). You can't make me accept anything without concrete proof, the fact is that the origin of the dynasty is dubious and contested by various sources. Damien2016 ( talk) 16:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kannada people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Kautilya3:, @ Pied Hornbill:, @ Doug Weller:, @ Arjayay:
Here are some examples of his disruptive edits:
It seems he has also attacked both Dough Weller and Arjayay previously, but no action seems to have been taken for his vandalism rampage so far. It would be better to lock this page for awhile. 117.198.118.192 ( talk) 23:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
"Backward communities" is not used appropriately among anthropologists or others who communicate frequently about different ethnic groups. The term "other backward communities" under castes and communities, should be removed, unless it is some sort of term of art, that is with a specific (non-offensive) definition in Indian English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C55:7D80:1F9D:93F:1081:4711:726 ( talk) 21:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Please take note @ Sitush: @ Kautilya3: people are adding genetics in South Asian ethnic group pages here which is not allowed according to consensus.Please remove them. 117.198.114.56 ( talk) 17:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Kannada term is masala Dhosey & there maybe many kinds of dosa but mainly called masale dhosey/masala dosa. LR1988 ( talk) 19:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Dosa originates from Udupi but Masala dosa is matter of Conjecture. Laks883 ( talk) 03:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kannada people has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Gijantic ( talk) 06:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Want to make some minor edits
![]() | This
edit request to
Kannada people has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Changes in cuisine part - Want to add dishes Gijantic ( talk) 09:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved to Kannadigas. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Kannada people → Kannadiga – "Kannadiga" is the more commonly used term for native Kannada speakers tracing their ancestry to Karnataka. Most sources available in the article also use the term "Kannadiga" instead of "Kannada people". At present, Kannadiga is a redirect to Kannada people. I propose that Kannada people be moved to Kannadiga. Dympies ( talk) 03:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Dympies ( talk) 05:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 06:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)