![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why does it have to be split? It seems reasonable to me that there be one article detailing the history of the observatory and separate linked articles for the individual experiments. So Kamiokande-II could be spun off into its own main page, but Hyper-Kamiokande is just a proposal right now, not an actual experiment. I don't see any reason why there shouldn't be an article that ties them all together and explains why they were built in the order they were.
I also think that having the information in one article avoids having every single article saying "detects the conical beam of light produced by charged particles moving faster than the speed of light in the media..." and each article also having a "see also" section with links to six other Kamioka experiments is just overkill. Flying fish 15:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 04:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have removed "The failure to detect proton decay in such a large detector would put serious strain on the Standard Model of particle physics", because, in my understanding, the standard model does not include proton decay. (The standard model conserves quark number.) -- Strait 15:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
How is KamiokaNDE pronounced? I have no trouble with the Japanese, it's the last NDE that I'm not sure about. Would it be, as the Kamiokande-II that followed it suggests, be pronounced as a single word? i.e. kamiokande and super kamiokande? freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 04:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The logo for both the observatory and Kamiokande are available here and the license given states that it may be used on any website promoting the project, so if someone wants to upload those, go for it! freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 06:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The word "enhancement" is used when "difference" is implied in the sentance: "Once 450 days of data had been accumulated the experiment was able to see a clear enhancement in the number of events which pointed away from sun over random directions." To me "enhancement" means something was originally not as good as it turned out to be. Comparing solar neutrinos to cosmic background neutrinos does not suggest any "enhancement" has happened but that there is a "difference" between them. 68.50.233.253 12:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm biased on this topic, so I won't touch anything T2K related - but someone should move it to a section like current experiments. T2K just finished it's first run of beam, and is about to start it's second - early results(Mostly statuses, but whatever) are being presented at conferences already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon.p.hastings ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Plus d'information visuel sur l'endroit. 173.176.30.209 ( talk) 14:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why does it have to be split? It seems reasonable to me that there be one article detailing the history of the observatory and separate linked articles for the individual experiments. So Kamiokande-II could be spun off into its own main page, but Hyper-Kamiokande is just a proposal right now, not an actual experiment. I don't see any reason why there shouldn't be an article that ties them all together and explains why they were built in the order they were.
I also think that having the information in one article avoids having every single article saying "detects the conical beam of light produced by charged particles moving faster than the speed of light in the media..." and each article also having a "see also" section with links to six other Kamioka experiments is just overkill. Flying fish 15:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 04:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have removed "The failure to detect proton decay in such a large detector would put serious strain on the Standard Model of particle physics", because, in my understanding, the standard model does not include proton decay. (The standard model conserves quark number.) -- Strait 15:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
How is KamiokaNDE pronounced? I have no trouble with the Japanese, it's the last NDE that I'm not sure about. Would it be, as the Kamiokande-II that followed it suggests, be pronounced as a single word? i.e. kamiokande and super kamiokande? freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 04:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The logo for both the observatory and Kamiokande are available here and the license given states that it may be used on any website promoting the project, so if someone wants to upload those, go for it! freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 06:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The word "enhancement" is used when "difference" is implied in the sentance: "Once 450 days of data had been accumulated the experiment was able to see a clear enhancement in the number of events which pointed away from sun over random directions." To me "enhancement" means something was originally not as good as it turned out to be. Comparing solar neutrinos to cosmic background neutrinos does not suggest any "enhancement" has happened but that there is a "difference" between them. 68.50.233.253 12:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm biased on this topic, so I won't touch anything T2K related - but someone should move it to a section like current experiments. T2K just finished it's first run of beam, and is about to start it's second - early results(Mostly statuses, but whatever) are being presented at conferences already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon.p.hastings ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Plus d'information visuel sur l'endroit. 173.176.30.209 ( talk) 14:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)