![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was no move. As the name of this entity is not an acronym, the use of "KM3NeT" would be for stylistic reasons only and not in line with WP:NC. JPG-GR ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The correct spelling is "KM3NeT" according to http://www.km3net.org/ and independent references in the litterature like http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4158, page 2. Since "KM3NeT" is a proper noun, WP:NC allows multiple capital letters. Compare with the "C" in IceCube Neutrino Observatory. The move seems mostly uncontroversial to me. My initial move request, however, was ignored, so I am attempting a more formal move request. Teply ( talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was moved to KM3Net based on common usage. Aervanath ( talk) 16:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
The previous request for move was rejected with the following explanation:
The result of the proposal was no move. As the name of this entity is not an acronym, the use of "KM3NeT" would be for stylistic reasons only and not in line with WP:NC. JPG-GR ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
But it is the acronim for cubic kilometer size (KM3) Neutrino Telescope (see the article). In my opinion, the article should be moved to it's correct spelling KM3NeT used by the official web site of the project. -- V1adis1av ( talk) 17:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I thought these were disctracting so I've placed them in collapsed boxes to save space. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 04:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
After reading the previous discussing, I agree that his page should be moved to KM3NeT. The previous two requests had nearly no participation, nor does it seem like the physics project was involved in them. Primary source indicate the acronym is KM3NeT, and the across-wikipedia usage is also KM3NeT. Were the other article not a redirect, it would simply have been moved, but since you need adminS to perform the move, there's a lot of bureaucratic creep involved. Relisting for input by the physics project as well as the usual crowd at RM, which should yield a clear consensus this time around. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 04:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Dropping articles about KM3NeT as I find them: — Huntster ( t @ c) 03:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was no move. As the name of this entity is not an acronym, the use of "KM3NeT" would be for stylistic reasons only and not in line with WP:NC. JPG-GR ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The correct spelling is "KM3NeT" according to http://www.km3net.org/ and independent references in the litterature like http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4158, page 2. Since "KM3NeT" is a proper noun, WP:NC allows multiple capital letters. Compare with the "C" in IceCube Neutrino Observatory. The move seems mostly uncontroversial to me. My initial move request, however, was ignored, so I am attempting a more formal move request. Teply ( talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was moved to KM3Net based on common usage. Aervanath ( talk) 16:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
The previous request for move was rejected with the following explanation:
The result of the proposal was no move. As the name of this entity is not an acronym, the use of "KM3NeT" would be for stylistic reasons only and not in line with WP:NC. JPG-GR ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
But it is the acronim for cubic kilometer size (KM3) Neutrino Telescope (see the article). In my opinion, the article should be moved to it's correct spelling KM3NeT used by the official web site of the project. -- V1adis1av ( talk) 17:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I thought these were disctracting so I've placed them in collapsed boxes to save space. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 04:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
After reading the previous discussing, I agree that his page should be moved to KM3NeT. The previous two requests had nearly no participation, nor does it seem like the physics project was involved in them. Primary source indicate the acronym is KM3NeT, and the across-wikipedia usage is also KM3NeT. Were the other article not a redirect, it would simply have been moved, but since you need adminS to perform the move, there's a lot of bureaucratic creep involved. Relisting for input by the physics project as well as the usual crowd at RM, which should yield a clear consensus this time around. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 04:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Dropping articles about KM3NeT as I find them: — Huntster ( t @ c) 03:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)