This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Image:KFX.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 12:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
This new article http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/05/205_44789.html from the Korea Times flat out states that the KFX will be an advanced 4.5 generation fighter aircraft rather than a 5th generation aircraft which is what the older article claimed. We should remove the comparable aircraft section completely. Semi-Lobster ( talk) 16:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Is there some translation error here? The 40k pounds of thrust from the Pratt & Whitney F135 is considered to be extreme for a jet fighter engine and the Koreans really want to add 25% on top of that? Hcobb ( talk) 15:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Where exactly is the original research? I spot like two refs per sentence here. Hcobb ( talk) 04:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on KAI KF-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
I think we should be careful about placing Indonesia into KAI's K-FX program as they're only investor and first hand purchaser not really involved in development in technologically way, there's no way Indonesia will get fully optional K-FX, what they're getting is very basic level of K-FX. Calling I-FX is totally wrong, Indonesia only invested less than 10% so far. Which is not acceptable when considering Koreans are doing all the hard works. --Korsentry — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry ( talk • contribs) 06:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Indonesian Defense Minister leaked the name as KF-21 "Boramae" Farbne ( talk) 02:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Here's the unveiling, skip to 32:27
Farbne ( talk) 15:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Wait I can't post the link Farbne ( talk) 15:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Okay search up "KF-X unveiling Farbne ( talk) 15:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
[1] Farbne ( talk) 15:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
References
Due to the continued vandalism of some users who do not provide appropriate sources, i have added references proving that the KF-X development program is a national project in South Korea. However, some users continue to add Indonesia to the National Origin on a continuous basis, without a source. The topic of the National Origin is repeating a pointless editorial war, even though it should be based on sources. Quotes that do not have an appropriate source for the National Origin should be deleted.
Gasiseda ( talk) 23:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
References
However on the other hand, little that general public know that among those domestic companies & institutions, Indonesia is also involved as backers, industries & investors, through US institutions. From 60 Korean govt-20 private sectors-20 Indo govt structure, Indonesian business is also involved in the Korean & US private sector. In fact the project commenced when in January 2010, a notable Indonesian American businessman, longtime friend of Korean business, introduced them to Indonesian aerospace industry, which later supports the birth and realization of this project. So I think both national origin & country involvement should list both, however since it's operating under KAI, the manufacturer could stay KAI only for now. In fact, involvement should also include US. Inukabear ( talk) 22:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
It is similar to F-35 case. F-35 was also a multi-national development and funded. Kadrun ( talk) 15:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Test flight 19 July 2022, ref 7 dated April 2021 (bottom first para) , nice article today japantimes.co.jp "South Korea's homegrown KF-21 fighter takes to the skies for first time" 20 July 2022
Japantimes.co.jp Sudzydoogiedawg ( talk) 08:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Does anyone know if there are any plans to add the BriteCloud decoy to the KF-21? It would be a very sensible and cheap addition because BriteCloud decoys can be fitted to standard chaff dispensers. 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 09:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Does "GBU-39 SDB (Block 2 improvement)" refer to SDB II Stormbreaker or something else? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 09:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia needs a WYSIWYG interface. 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 10:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Is there any other type of the KF-21? Is there a twin-seat variant? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 10:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What does 보라매 actually mean? According to the article, 보라매 means "young hawk" or "fighting hawk". But according to Google Translate it means Boramae (very unhelpful) and according to DeepL it means "vulture". Does anyone know the scientific Latin name for 보라매 ? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 12:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What specific missile is this referring to? What is its name? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 13:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Image:KFX.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 12:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
This new article http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/05/205_44789.html from the Korea Times flat out states that the KFX will be an advanced 4.5 generation fighter aircraft rather than a 5th generation aircraft which is what the older article claimed. We should remove the comparable aircraft section completely. Semi-Lobster ( talk) 16:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Is there some translation error here? The 40k pounds of thrust from the Pratt & Whitney F135 is considered to be extreme for a jet fighter engine and the Koreans really want to add 25% on top of that? Hcobb ( talk) 15:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Where exactly is the original research? I spot like two refs per sentence here. Hcobb ( talk) 04:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on KAI KF-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
I think we should be careful about placing Indonesia into KAI's K-FX program as they're only investor and first hand purchaser not really involved in development in technologically way, there's no way Indonesia will get fully optional K-FX, what they're getting is very basic level of K-FX. Calling I-FX is totally wrong, Indonesia only invested less than 10% so far. Which is not acceptable when considering Koreans are doing all the hard works. --Korsentry — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry ( talk • contribs) 06:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Indonesian Defense Minister leaked the name as KF-21 "Boramae" Farbne ( talk) 02:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Here's the unveiling, skip to 32:27
Farbne ( talk) 15:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Wait I can't post the link Farbne ( talk) 15:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Okay search up "KF-X unveiling Farbne ( talk) 15:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
[1] Farbne ( talk) 15:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
References
Due to the continued vandalism of some users who do not provide appropriate sources, i have added references proving that the KF-X development program is a national project in South Korea. However, some users continue to add Indonesia to the National Origin on a continuous basis, without a source. The topic of the National Origin is repeating a pointless editorial war, even though it should be based on sources. Quotes that do not have an appropriate source for the National Origin should be deleted.
Gasiseda ( talk) 23:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
References
However on the other hand, little that general public know that among those domestic companies & institutions, Indonesia is also involved as backers, industries & investors, through US institutions. From 60 Korean govt-20 private sectors-20 Indo govt structure, Indonesian business is also involved in the Korean & US private sector. In fact the project commenced when in January 2010, a notable Indonesian American businessman, longtime friend of Korean business, introduced them to Indonesian aerospace industry, which later supports the birth and realization of this project. So I think both national origin & country involvement should list both, however since it's operating under KAI, the manufacturer could stay KAI only for now. In fact, involvement should also include US. Inukabear ( talk) 22:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
It is similar to F-35 case. F-35 was also a multi-national development and funded. Kadrun ( talk) 15:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Test flight 19 July 2022, ref 7 dated April 2021 (bottom first para) , nice article today japantimes.co.jp "South Korea's homegrown KF-21 fighter takes to the skies for first time" 20 July 2022
Japantimes.co.jp Sudzydoogiedawg ( talk) 08:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Does anyone know if there are any plans to add the BriteCloud decoy to the KF-21? It would be a very sensible and cheap addition because BriteCloud decoys can be fitted to standard chaff dispensers. 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 09:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Does "GBU-39 SDB (Block 2 improvement)" refer to SDB II Stormbreaker or something else? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 09:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia needs a WYSIWYG interface. 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 10:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Is there any other type of the KF-21? Is there a twin-seat variant? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 10:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What does 보라매 actually mean? According to the article, 보라매 means "young hawk" or "fighting hawk". But according to Google Translate it means Boramae (very unhelpful) and according to DeepL it means "vulture". Does anyone know the scientific Latin name for 보라매 ? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 12:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What specific missile is this referring to? What is its name? 2.25.65.76 ( talk) 13:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)